{"id":212151,"date":"2017-03-01T05:56:16","date_gmt":"2017-03-01T10:56:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/spacex-could-beat-nasa-back-to-the-moon-space-com.php"},"modified":"2017-03-01T05:56:16","modified_gmt":"2017-03-01T10:56:16","slug":"spacex-could-beat-nasa-back-to-the-moon-space-com","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/spacex-could-beat-nasa-back-to-the-moon-space-com.php","title":{"rendered":"SpaceX Could Beat NASA Back to the Moon &#8211; Space.com"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    SpaceX's planto    fly two private citizens around the moon would put the    company ahead of NASA's planned crewed flight with its Space    Launch System (SLS) megarocket.  <\/p>\n<p>    Yesterday, SpaceX announced its intention to send passengers on    a crewed Dragon spacecraft, launched with a Falcon Heavy    rocket, around the moon near the end of 2018. This would follow    on the heels of the company's robotic andcrewed    flights to the International Space Station, and an uncrewed    Falcon Heavy moon trip.  <\/p>\n<p>    NASA's own mission, which would be the first crewed flight    using the SLS and its new Orion spacecraft, is scheduled for    2021. NASA recently     began an investigation into whether it could put astronauts    on SLS and Orion's first launch, scheduled for 2018  but    officials have said that a crewed version of that launch    wouldn't fly until 2019. Assuming SpaceX is on schedule, its    fly-around would come first. [SpaceX    Falcon Heavy to Be Reusable (Video)]  <\/p>\n<p>    SpaceX going first \"might change     the acceptable-risk discussions NASA has with the ASAP    [Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel],\" Scott Hubbard, researcher    in the Stanford University Department of Aeronautics and    Astronautics, told Space.com. \"I could imagine that if this    independent entrepreneur has done it, and successfully    identified the risk factors, it would be real information, not    speculation.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"Others might then ask about [the] need for SLS and Orion  but    two suppliers are always better from a competition\/cost POV,\"    he added via email. Hubbard worked at NASA for 20 years and    ultimately led its Ames Research Center, and he currently    chairs SpaceX's independent Safety Advisory Panel for    Commercial Crew, which focuses specifically on the design and    risks of their program to carry astronauts to the International    Space Station.  <\/p>\n<p>      SpaceX could not do this without NASA. Can't express enough      appreciation. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/uQpI60zAV7\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/t.co\/uQpI60zAV7<\/a>    <\/p>\n<p>    During Elon Musk's teleconference yesterday, the SpaceX CEO    said that NASA astronauts would \"take priority\" if the agency    wanted to be the first to fly that type of mission. NASA    released a statement sayingthe    agency would work closely with SpaceX to ensure the company    met all safety requirements and continued to fulfill its space    station delivery contract.  <\/p>\n<p>    As for SpaceX's ambitious time frame, Hubbard said it should be    feasible in principle, purely considering the company's    transportation capabilities, but that technical questions    remain.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The key technical issue will be demonstrating life support in    the Dragon for two people for the duration of the mission,\" he    said. \"With reasonable margins, the length of mission will be    longer than planned for commercial crew. The key programmatic    issue is level of risk: Is it understood? Has it been mitigated    sufficiently?\"  <\/p>\n<p>    If SpaceX can address those issues, it will be on track to    launch a moon mission on the 50th anniversary of Apollo 8,    NASA's first    mission to orbit the moon. That could certainly serve to    spur other commercial spaceflight companies, and NASA, into    action. Hubbard pointed to when he held a workshop with The    Planetary Society that said     astronauts could orbit Mars by 2033, and not long after    Lockheed Martin came out with a     Mars Base Camp plan for 2028 and SpaceX came out with        their Red Dragon Mars mission now scheduled for 2020.  <\/p>\n<p>    This moon announcement \"sets a bold new goal,\" Hubbard said.    \"There are people that are out there moving the goalposts with    some significant technical credibility behind them, and this    goal of two paying customers and an Apollo 8 loop around the    moon in 2018 could well stimulate others to join in.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The more groups you have trying this, the better off we are as    a spacefaring nation or a spacefaring species,\" he added.  <\/p>\n<p>    Email Sarah Lewin at <a href=\"mailto:slewin@space.com\">slewin@space.com<\/a> or follow her    @SarahExplains.    Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook    and     Google+. Original article on     Space.com.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.space.com\/35861-spacex-could-beat-nasa-to-the-moon.html\" title=\"SpaceX Could Beat NASA Back to the Moon - Space.com\">SpaceX Could Beat NASA Back to the Moon - Space.com<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> SpaceX's planto fly two private citizens around the moon would put the company ahead of NASA's planned crewed flight with its Space Launch System (SLS) megarocket. Yesterday, SpaceX announced its intention to send passengers on a crewed Dragon spacecraft, launched with a Falcon Heavy rocket, around the moon near the end of 2018 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/spacex-could-beat-nasa-back-to-the-moon-space-com.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212151","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nasa"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212151"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212151"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212151\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212151"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212151"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212151"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}