{"id":211769,"date":"2017-02-28T06:49:36","date_gmt":"2017-02-28T11:49:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/yes-mr-president-health-care-is-complicated-now-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it-huffington-post.php"},"modified":"2017-02-28T06:49:36","modified_gmt":"2017-02-28T11:49:36","slug":"yes-mr-president-health-care-is-complicated-now-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it-huffington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/yes-mr-president-health-care-is-complicated-now-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it-huffington-post.php","title":{"rendered":"Yes, Mr. President, Health Care Is &#8216;Complicated.&#8217; Now What Are You Going To Do About It? &#8211; Huffington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Nobody knew health care could be so      complicated.    <\/p>\n<p>      That was President Donald Trump speaking at the White House      Monday, and if anything can encapsulate the dilemma      facing Republicans as they haltingly try to keep      their campaign promises to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Actaka      Obamacare  its that.    <\/p>\n<p>      The idea that nobody knew health care is complicated      is, of course, nonsense  as literally anyone whos ever      visited a doctor or used health insurance could tell you. But      the realization seems to have come belatedly to Trump.    <\/p>\n<p>      Perhaps Trump will use his address before a joint      session of Congress Tuesday to lay out a detailed plan for      how to remake the health care system. But the presidents      own shifting and contradictory      statements about health care reform suggest that he      remains unclear about what to do and how much ownership to      take of the consequences of repealing the Affordable Care      Act.    <\/p>\n<p>      At a recent meeting with Ohio Gov. John Kasich (R), for      example, Trump seemed to be swayed by appeals to keep much of      the laws coverage expansion in place. The governor drew      charts on pieces of paper on the presidents desk outlining      the potential costs of repeal, an aide familiar with the      exchange told The Huffington Post.    <\/p>\n<p>      He responded very positively to a number of the ideas      I had, Kasich, who used the Affordable Care Act to expand      Medicaid, said on CBS News Face the      Nation Sunday.    <\/p>\n<p>      Trump went over the charts three separate times, and      even got his newly installed Health and Human Services Secretary Tom      Price on the phone to discuss it further,      according to the aide. Other aides had to remind the      president that the congressional Republican plans are far      less generous, after which Trump expressed preference      for Kasichs approach, as The Washington Post reported.          <\/p>\n<p>      At a separate meeting with a bipartisan group of governors,      meanwhile, Trump largely punted on details for his health      care plan when pressed by attendees, a source familiar with      the session who was not authorized to speak publicly about it      told HuffPost. But when Price said that there would be a      replacement plan in place about four weeks after repeal was      enacted, Trump did chime in, saying it needed to be done in      two or three weeks.    <\/p>\n<p>      House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and Senate Majority      LeaderMitch McConnell(R-Ky.) seem to have a      better sense of where they want to go with repeal  perhaps      because they, especially Ryan, have spent more time focusing      on the issue.    <\/p>\n<p>      But these congressional leaders havent been able to      bridge the divides in their      own skittish caucuses about the timing or scope of the repeal      and replace effort. Meanwhile, there has been      agroundswell of anger      over the prospect of killing the increasingly popular      law.    <\/p>\n<p>      Ryan appears desperate enough to advance Affordable      Care Act repeal that hes considering pushing legislation to      the floor and essentially daring reluctant and unsatisfied      members to vote against it, The Wall Street      Journal reports.    <\/p>\n<p>      The bet is that few Republicans would pass up a chance      to damage the Affordable Care Act, lest their supporters see      them breaking their promise to do so. This trial balloon      didnt soar long: On Monday, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), who      chairs the conservative House Freedom Caucus,said      that he would vote against a forthcoming GOP      leadership proposal if, like a version that leaked to Politicolast week, it      still had elements of an entitlement program.    <\/p>\n<p>      That underscores Republicans risky bid. Additionally,      legislators would have to be on record calling for millions of people to lose health care      with no guarantee that the Senate would follow suit, or that Congress as a      whole would eventually come up with something better than the      Affordable Care Act.    <\/p>\n<p>    Aude Guerrucci\/AFP\/Getty Images  <\/p>\n<p>      This disarray is new  although, in hindsight, it was      to be expected. In the years since Democrats in Congress and      then-President Barack Obama began putting together the      Affordable Care Act and working to implement it, Republicans      have had the luxury of sitting in the backseat, criticizing      the law and talking about how much better they could      do.    <\/p>\n<p>      Now theyre in the drivers seat, and they cant even      agree on a destination, much less a route to get      there.    <\/p>\n<p>      Republicans are trying to square their promises to, as      Trump put it, offer great health      carethats much less expensive and much      betterwhile still eliminating the      taxes on wealthy people and health care companies.    <\/p>\n<p>      Thats pretty much impossible, because those taxes pay      for about half of what the Affordable Care Act does  and      theres no enthusiasm for alternative ways to raise the      money.    <\/p>\n<p>      Republicans also cant square their promises of great      health care with the partys ideological commitment to      smaller government, since without regulations, insurers will      offer policies that cover fewer services and offer even less      financial protection. And without generous government      subsidies, poor people and many middle-class people wont      have enough money to buy coverage.    <\/p>\n<p>      That draft legislation that leaked to      Politicomakes clear how leaders intend      to resolve the inconsistencies in their rhetoric. They      would weaken protections for people with      pre-existing conditions and dramatically      slash federal spending on health care for the poor and the      middle class, while proposing a new tax on the job-based      health benefit plans that cover the majority of      Americans.    <\/p>\n<p>      The result would be many more people without insurance      and much greater exposure to medical bills for those who have      coverage, according to an analysis of the plan that      Axios and      Vox obtained.          <\/p>\n<p>      This approach isnt surprising. Ryans philosophical idol      is the objectivist writer Ayn Rand, and he believes      that high taxation of the wealthy is morally wrong and that      the government should provide far less help to the indigent      than it currently does. McConnell has a more flexible      ideology, but hes never had much of an appetite for      preserving big government programs when he can kill them      instead.     <\/p>\n<p>      The White House, though, is another story. Trump      certainly isnt an orthodox conservative, and hes barely a      Republican in the traditional sense.     <\/p>\n<p>      On the one hand, Trump chose Price, an ideological      conservative, to be secretary of health and human services.      And at various points during his candidacy and the      presidential transition, he embraced reforms consistent with      Ryans.    <\/p>\n<p>      On the other hand, Trump also keeps pledging      insurance for      everybody,a pledge utterly      inconsistent with Ryans and Prices proposals, and with      decades of GOP health care policies.    <\/p>\n<p>      The simplest explanation for the inconsistency is      ignorance  Trump doesnt really understand the trade-offs of      health policy, and cant be bothered to learn. His comment at      the White House Monday supports that theory.    <\/p>\n<p>      But its also possible that Trump has genuinely mixed      feelings. The abstract notion of snatching away health      coverage from millions of poor and working-class families may      not trouble the presidents sleep, but some of those folks      are his voters, and theyre growing increasingly worried that      when Republicans promised to repeal Obamacare, it      meant their Obamacare,      too.    <\/p>\n<p>      We also know that Trumps advisers are      divided, as The Washington Post reported      over the weekend.    <\/p>\n<p>      Vice President Mike Pence and others are urging the president      to forge ahead with repeal. But chief strategist Steve      Bannon, senior policy adviser Stephen Miller, presidential      son-in-law Jared Kushner (whose brother runs a health      insurance company) and National Economic Council Chairman      Gary Cohn dont want the president mired in the health care      mess, according to the report.    <\/p>\n<p>      This is the dawning realization that repeal is      politically riskier than GOP lawmakers allowed themselves to      acknowledge during the past eight years.    <\/p>\n<p>      The health care fight is also sucking up time and      political capital, creating higher hurdles for Trump and the      GOP to advance the rest of their agenda, including tax cuts for the rich and infrastructure      spending.    <\/p>\n<p>      The question is whether at some point Trump decides to      steer this debate in one direction or the other. He may not.      He may just remain hands-off, or continue to send conflicting      signals. But at some point the fate of reform may hang      on his actions  whether its giving up, lobbying legislators      or, ultimately, signing a bill. In other words, he cant duck      the choice forever.     <\/p>\n<p>      And so it will be interesting to see whether, on      Tuesday night, Trump decides to start weighing in more      forcefully. Like the man said: Its complicated.    <\/p>\n<p>      Sam Stein contributed reporting.    <\/p>\n<p>      Sign      up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday,      we will bring you the best original reporting, long form      writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around      the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how its all made.      Click here      to sign up!    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/donald-trump-health-care-complicated_us_58b48652e4b0780bac2c54f0\" title=\"Yes, Mr. President, Health Care Is 'Complicated.' Now What Are You Going To Do About It? - Huffington Post\">Yes, Mr. President, Health Care Is 'Complicated.' Now What Are You Going To Do About It? - Huffington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Nobody knew health care could be so complicated. That was President Donald Trump speaking at the White House Monday, and if anything can encapsulate the dilemma facing Republicans as they haltingly try to keep their campaign promises to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Actaka Obamacare its that.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/yes-mr-president-health-care-is-complicated-now-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it-huffington-post.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211769","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211769"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211769"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211769\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211769"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211769"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211769"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}