{"id":211552,"date":"2017-02-27T04:00:15","date_gmt":"2017-02-27T09:00:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/is-spirituality-irrational-huffington-post.php"},"modified":"2017-02-27T04:00:15","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T09:00:15","slug":"is-spirituality-irrational-huffington-post","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/spirituality\/is-spirituality-irrational-huffington-post.php","title":{"rendered":"Is Spirituality Irrational? &#8211; Huffington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Spirituality and rationality seem completely opposed. But are      they really?    <\/p>\n<p>      To get at this question, let's start with a little thought      experiment. Consider the following two questions:    <\/p>\n<p>      1. If you were given a choice between reading a physical book      (or an e-book) or listening to an audiobook, which would you      prefer?    <\/p>\n<p>      2. If you were given a choice between listening to music, or      looking at the grooves of a phonograph record through a      microscope, which would you prefer?    <\/p>\n<p>      But I am more interested in the answer to a third question:    <\/p>\n<p>      3. For which of the first two questions do you have a      stronger preference between the two options?    <\/p>\n<p>      Most people will have a stronger preference in the second      case than the first. But why? Both situations are in some      sense the same: there is information being fed into your      brain, in one case through your ears and in the other through      your eyes. So why should people's preference for ears be so      much stronger in the case of music than books?    <\/p>\n<p>      There is something in the essence of music that is lost in      the translation between an audio and a visual rendering. The      same loss happens for words too, but to a much lesser extent.      Subtle shades of emphasis and tone of voice can convey      essential information in spoken language. This is one of the      reasons that email is so notorious for amplifying      misunderstandings. But the loss in much greater in the case      of music.    <\/p>\n<p>      The same is true for other senses. Color is one example. A      blind person can abstractly understand what light is, and      that color is a byproduct of the wavelength of light, and      that light is a form of electromagnetic radiation... yet      there is no way for a blind person to experience subjectively      the difference between red and blue and green. But just      because some people can't see colors doesn't mean that colors      aren't real.    <\/p>\n<p>      The same is true for spiritual experiences.    <\/p>\n<p>      Now, before I expand that thought, I want to give you my bona      fides. I am a committed rationalist, and an atheist (though I      don't like to self-identify as an atheist because I'd rather      focus on what I *do* believe in rather than what I don't). So      I am not trying to convince you that God exists. What I want      to say is rather that certain kinds of spiritual experiences      *might* be more than mere fantasies made up out of whole      cloth. If we ignore this possibility we risk shutting      ourselves off from a vital part of the human experience.    <\/p>\n<p>      I grew up in the deep south (Kentucky and Tennessee) in a      secular Jewish family. When I was 12 my parents sent me to a      Christian summer camp (there were no other kinds in Kentucky      back in those days). After a week of being relentlessly      proselytized (read: teased and ostracized), I decided I was      tired of being the camp punching bag and so I relented and      gave my heart to Jesus. I prayed, confessed my sins, and just      like that I was a member of the club.    <\/p>\n<p>      I experienced a euphoria that I cannot render into words, in      exactly the same way that one cannot render into words the      subjective experience of listening to music or seeing colors      or eating chocolate or having sex. If you have not      experienced these things for yourself, no amount of      description can fill the gap. Of course, you can come to an      *intellectual* understanding that \"feeling the presence of      the holy spirit\" has nothing to do with any holy spirit. You      can intellectually grasp that it is an internal mental      process resulting from (probably) some kind of neurotransmitter released in response to      social and internal mental stimulus. But that won't allow you      to understand *what it is like* any more than understanding      physics will let you understand what colors look like or what      music sounds like.    <\/p>\n<p>      Happily, there are ways to stimulate the subjective      experience that I'm describing other than accepting Jesus as      your Lord and Savior. Meditation, for example, can produce      similar results. It can be a very powerful experience. It can even      become addictive, almost like a drug.    <\/p>\n<p>      I am not necessarily advocating that you go try to get      yourself a hit of religious euphoria (though I wouldnt      discourage you either -- the experience can give you some      interesting and useful perspective on life). Instead, I      simply want to convince you to entertain the possibility that      people might profess to believe in God for reasons other than      indoctrination or stupidity. Religious texts and rituals      might be attempts to share real subjective experiences that,      in the absence of a detailed modern understanding of      neuroscience, can appear to originate from mysterious, subtle      external sources.    <\/p>\n<p>      The reason I want to convince you to entertain this notion is      that an awful lot of energy gets wasted by arguing against      religious beliefs on logical grounds, pointing out      contradictions in the Bible and whatnot. Such arguments tend      to be ineffective, which can be very frustrating for those      who advance them. The antidote for this frustration is to      realize that spirituality is not about logic. It's about      subjective experiences to which not everyone is privy. Logic      is about looking at the grooves. Spirituality is about      hearing the music.    <\/p>\n<p>      The good news is that adopting science and reason doesnt      mean you have to give up on spirituality any more than you      have to give up on music. There are myriad paths to spiritual      experience, to a sense of awe and wonder at the grand      tapestry of creation, to the essential existential mysteries      of life and consciousness, to what religious people call      God. Walking in the woods. Seeing the moons of Jupiter      through a telescope. Gathering with friends to listen to      music, or to sing, or simply to share the experience of being      alive. Meditation. Any of these can be spiritual experiences      if you allow them to be. In this sense, God is everywhere.    <\/p>\n<p>      Things to ponder: Why are spiritual      experiences in general so strongly associated with      irrationality? Is it possible that spiritual experiences      *causes* people to become irrational?    <\/p>\n<p>      Do you think comparing spiritual experience to music is an      apt analogy? What about comparing it to a psychedelic drug?    <\/p>\n<p>      What are the benefits and drawbacks of seeking spiritual      experiences? On balance, is it a worthwhile thing to do?    <\/p>\n<p>      ____________________________________________________________________    <\/p>\n<p>      Connect with Dr. Gleb      TsipurskyonTwitter, onFacebook, and onLinkedIn, and follow his RSS feed and newsletter.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/entry\/is-spirituality-irrational_us_58ada54fe4b040d4868a62d7\" title=\"Is Spirituality Irrational? - Huffington Post\">Is Spirituality Irrational? - Huffington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Spirituality and rationality seem completely opposed. But are they really <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/spirituality\/is-spirituality-irrational-huffington-post.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-spirituality"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211552"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211552\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}