Katherine Bailey Crunch Network Contributor <\/p>\n
Katherine Bailey is principal data scientist at Acquia. <\/p>\n
More posts by this contributor: <\/p>\n
In recent years, weve seen an increasing number of so-called intelligent digital assistants being introduced on various devices. At the recent CES, both Hyundai and Toyota announced new in-car assistants. Although the technology behind these applications keeps getting better, theres still a tendency for people to be disappointed by their capabilities the expectation of intelligence is not being met. <\/p>\n
The city councilmen refused the demonstrators a permit because they feared violence. <\/p>\n
What does the word they refer to here the councilmen or the demonstrators? What if instead of feared we wrote advocated? This changes what we understand by the word they. Why? It is clear to us that councilmen are more likely to fear violence, whereas demonstrators are more likely to advocate it. This information, which is vital for disambiguating the pronoun they, is not in the text itself, which makes these problems extremely difficult for AI programs. <\/p>\n
The first ever Winograd Schema Challenge was held last July, and the winning algorithm achieved a score on the challenge that was a bit better than random. <\/p>\n
Theres a technique for representing the words of a language thats proving incredibly useful in many NLP tasks, such as sentiment analysis and machine translation. The representations are known as word embeddings, and they are mathematical representations of words that are trained from millions of examples of word usage in order to capture meaning. This is done by capturing relationships between words. To use a classic example, a good set of representations would capture the relationship king is to man as queen is to woman by ensuring that a particular mathematical relationship holds between the respective vectors (specifically, king man + woman = queen). <\/p>\n
Such vectorized representations are at the heart of Googles new translation system, although they are representations of entire sentences, not just words. The new system reduces translation errors by more than 55-85 percent on several major language pairs and can perform zero-shot translation: translation between language pairs for which no training data exists. <\/p>\n
Given all this, it may seem surprising to hear Oren Etzioni, a leading AI researcher with a particular focus on NLP, quip: When AI cant determine what it refers to in a sentence, its hard to believe that it will take over the world. <\/p>\n
So, AI can perform adequate translations between language pairs it was never trained on but it cant determine what it refers to? How can this be? <\/p>\n
When hearing about how vectorized representations of words and sentences work, it can be tempting to think they really are capturing meaning in the sense that there is some understanding happening. But this would be a mistake. The representations are derived from examples of language use. Our use of language is driven by meaning. Therefore, the derived representations naturally reflect that meaning. But the AI systems learning such representations have no direct access to actual meaning. <\/p>\n
For the purposes of many NLP tasks, lack of access to actual meaning is not a serious problem. <\/p>\n
Not understanding what it refers to in a sentence is not going to have an enormous effect on translation accuracy it might mean il is used instead of elle when translating into French, but thats probably not a big deal. <\/p>\n
However, problems arise when trying to create a conversational AI: <\/p>\n
Screenshot from the sample bot you can create with IBMs conversation service following this tutorial. <\/p>\n
Understanding the referents of pronouns is a pretty important skill for holding conversations. As stated above, the training data used to train AIs that perform NLP tasks does not include the necessary information for disambiguating these words. That information comes from knowledge about the world. Whether its necessary to actually act as an embodied entity in the world or simply have vast amounts of common sense knowledge programmed in,to glean the necessary information is still an open question. Perhaps its something in-between. <\/p>\n
Terry Winograds early Natural Language Understanding program SHRDLU restricted itself to statements about a world made up of blocks. By Ksloniewski (Own work) CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons <\/p>\n
But there are ways of enhancing such conversational AI experiences even without solving natural language understanding (which may take decades, or longer). The image above showing a bot not understanding now turn them back on when the immediately prior request was turn off the windshield wipers demonstrates how disappointing it is when a totally unambiguous pronoun cannot be understood. That is definitely solvable with todays technology. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more here: <\/p>\n
Conversational AI and the road ahead - TechCrunch<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Katherine Bailey Crunch Network Contributor Katherine Bailey is principal data scientist at Acquia. More posts by this contributor: In recent years, weve seen an increasing number of so-called intelligent digital assistants being introduced on various devices. At the recent CES, both Hyundai and Toyota announced new in-car assistants. Continue reading