{"id":211107,"date":"2017-02-24T20:16:16","date_gmt":"2017-02-25T01:16:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/modernism-and-its-rages-city-journal.php"},"modified":"2017-02-24T20:16:16","modified_gmt":"2017-02-25T01:16:16","slug":"modernism-and-its-rages-city-journal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/rationalism\/modernism-and-its-rages-city-journal.php","title":{"rendered":"Modernism and Its Rages &#8211; City Journal"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Age Of Anger: A History of the    Present, by Pankaj Mishra (Farrar, Straus and Giroux,    416 pp., $27)  <\/p>\n<p>    ABritish writer of immense    learning, Pankaj Mishra has authored a new book, Age of    Anger: A History of the Present, that reflects an    extraordinary breadth of reading. It opens as a conventional    work of intellectual historyin this case, the history of    modernization and its travailsbut soon becomes more of a    collage of aperus organized around themes laid out by the    path-breaking critic of modernity Jean-Jacques Rousseau, the    1920s Iranian writer Jalal al-Ahmed, and the Italian    poet-cum-Duce Gabriel DAnnunzio, among many others.  <\/p>\n<p>    For instance, Mishra pits Rousseaus finicky quest for    authenticity against Voltaires heirs, the mimic men who try    to replicate Anglo-French manners and mores. Mishra sees    Voltaire as primarily a champion of enlightened despotism,    while Rousseau is presented as a clear-eyed critic of liberal    rationalism and cosmopolitan pretension. Mishra is sympathetic    to al-Ahmeds obsession with the psychic damage or    Westoxification imposed on the Islamic world by Western    colonialism. Hes fascinated by DAnnunzio, who, in the wake of    World War I, choreographed a disastrous fascist future that    paved the way for Mussolini. DAnnunzio was the first Italian    politician who decked out his supporters in black uniforms and    stiff armed salutes. He cheered on the Italian armies as they    conquered the Ottoman provinces that came to be called Libya    and which, Mishra notes, suffered the worlds first aerial    bombing in 1912. Libya became the testing ground for the New    Man theorized by Nietzsche and Sorel.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mishras loosely connected pearls of insight about belief,    mindsets and outlooks are tied together by his    anti-anti-Communism, an outlook echoed by todays    anti-anti-Islamicism, exemplified in the pages of the British    Guardian, which paints the Muslim world as the victim    of Western liberalism. Mishras disdain for the liberal ideals    of progress and reasoned choice, understood as excesses of    individualism, will be familiar to readers of Elie Kedourie on    nationalism, Jacob Talmon on the creation of secular    salvationism, Christopher Lasch and John Gray on the paradoxes    of progress, and William Pfaff on the pent-up violence of the    modern world. But his discussion of the Nazi origins of Hindu    nationalism will be eye-opening to many readers.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mishras intermittent account of how the writings of Giuseppe    Mazzini, the liberal nationalist founder of modern Italy,    inspired nationalists in India and China places the problem of    modernization in an illuminating context. On a darker note,    Mazzini influenced Georges Sorel, whose anti-liberal paeans to    the power of myth excited would-be dictators on both right and    left. Sorel saw in the working class the collective incarnation    of the Nietzschean superman. Mussolini first read Sorels work    on violence when he was a socialist, but he continued to    incorporate his ideas as he moved to develop fascism.  <\/p>\n<p>    Mishra is right to argue that attempts to modernize traditional    cultures involve, as in Italy and Germany, considerable psychic    dislocation. It can produce a burning anger fueled by the    emotional displacement of communal cultures fractured by the    demands of economic individualism. But Mishra goes off the    rails when he tries to assimilate the acquired insanity of    Islamic jihad into the pains of modernization. Modernizationas    in Iranoffered an alternative to the meld of entitlements and    resentments borne of Islamic claims to rule over infidels.    Islam has always been a political theology of the sword.    Muhammad wasnt responding to modernization when he slaughtered    the Jews of Medina.  <\/p>\n<p>    The books failing is its lack of historical context and    slipshod understanding of America. Mishra insists on seeing    constitutionalist America, which had little interest in    Britains Benthamism, as a utilitarian nation. He sees early    twentieth-century social Darwinism as an American right-wing    ideology when its appeal, as the great historian of liberalism    Eric Goldman documented, was almost entirely to the liberal    Left. Reading Mishras repeated references to Timothy McVeigh,    one might think that the 1995 Oklahoma City bomber had inspired    an army of imitators comparable in size and strength to    al-Qaida. Mishra writes that centuries of civil war, imperial    conquest and genocide in Europe and America has been    downplayed in the West, which suffers from a lack of    self-criticism. Its hard to take such an assertion seriously.    Can Mishra really be unaware of the epidemic of political    correctness and self-hatred infecting the universities and the    broadsheet press?  <\/p>\n<p>    Mishra disdains the new nationalism as an expression of    irrationalist urges, concluding, in the words of Alan Bloom,    that fascism has a future. But he has nothing to say about    the E.U. autocracy thats governed Europe so ineptly. He seems    unaware of the close connection between liberal nationalism and    the practice of democracy. Hes similarly contemptuous of    Donald Trump, proclaiming his administration a disaster even    before the New York real-estate dealer took office. Trump may    well turn out to be a failure, but Mishra seems not to grasp    the connection between Barack Obamas insistence that    Islamophobia is as great a problem as terrorisma view that    Mishra sharesand Trumps rise to power. Similarly, the E.U.,    which proclaims itself an expiation of past nationalist    excesses, has unwittingly midwifed a new nationalism.  <\/p>\n<p>    A book lacking a conventional structure, Age of Anger    repeatedly circles around the subject of modernization. Mishra    doesnt so much conclude as exhaust his conceptual repetitions.    Nonetheless, Age of Anger is well worth reading, even    if its best approached like a rich buffet that should be    selectively sampled.  <\/p>\n<p>    Fred Siegelis    aCity Journalcontributing editor, Scholar    in Residence at St. Francis College in Brooklyn, and the author    ofThe Revolt Against the Masses: How Liberalism    Has Undermined the Middle Class.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/html\/modernism-and-its-rages-15032.html\" title=\"Modernism and Its Rages - City Journal\">Modernism and Its Rages - City Journal<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Age Of Anger: A History of the Present, by Pankaj Mishra (Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 416 pp., $27) ABritish writer of immense learning, Pankaj Mishra has authored a new book, Age of Anger: A History of the Present, that reflects an extraordinary breadth of reading.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/rationalism\/modernism-and-its-rages-city-journal.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431564],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-211107","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-rationalism"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211107"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=211107"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/211107\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=211107"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=211107"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=211107"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}