Split long article <\/p>\n
Might this longish entry be better presented as a series of pages? JasonS 03:34 Jan 13, 2003 (UTC) <\/p>\n
Dnagod 20:56, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) <\/p>\n
In the interest of ensuring transhuman is NPOV: Who decides what the definition of transhumanism is? <\/p>\n
This element of humanism, is that from huxley or someone else? <\/p>\n
Does the man who invented the word, Julian Huxley decide the definition of Transhumanism, does one in modern times who publically states the definition decide or does the World Transhumanism Association decide? <\/p>\n
I would like clarity as to who ultimately determines what transhumanism means because the definition used by the WTA and other groups differs. More importantly, what gives one authority or the command to be able to define in an undisputed what transhumanism is, so that other POV's can be excluded? <\/p>\n
For instance I have reviewed the entire transtopia.org, prometheism.net and cosmotheism.net site, and I can't seem to figure out how you could label it as disputed in the links section? <\/p>\n
What is to say the world transhumanism association isnt disputed? <\/p>\n
I can see how one might label cosmotheism as white racial separatist, but prometheism.net and transtopia.org I would like more discussion as to why it is disputed as a transhumanism group. And why is Cosmotheism a disputed offshoot? Cosmotheism was developed in the 1960's and 1970's which came before extropy and WTA, so why is it an offshoot? I thought offshoot meant, that something existed and a branch or seed came off that plant. Can you please define offshoot and explain who decides what is or is not transhumanism? <\/p>\n
More on this humanism element of Transhumanism, is that from huxley or someone else? Thanks. <\/p>\n
Why does the link to cosmotheism keep getting deleted? Just because that article had a banned user associated w it doesn't make it any less relevent. Sam [Spade] 20:56, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC) <\/p>\n
I'd like to incorporate a mention of the Human Cognome Project into this article, as it is relevent to human brain augmentation and AI research. Any suggestions? -- Dave User:Sydhart <\/p>\n
Why is transtopia.org, prometheism.net and cosmotheism.net labelled pseudotranshuman organizations? To me that represents bias as to why those web sites would be labelled pseudo, what makes a web site pseudo? <\/p>\n
On the front page of prometheism.net it states the following <\/p>\n
(Prometheism is) The First Sovereign Transtopian & Neo-Eugenic Libertarian Religious-State. <\/p>\n
In the principles sections of prometheism it states <\/p>\n
Our Promethean Species embraces Conscious Evolution <\/p>\n
Our immediate aim is to create a neo-eugenically enhanced race that will eventually become a new, superior species with whatever scientific means are available at the present time. In the short-term, this will be achieved via neo-eugenics, ie. voluntary positive eugenics, human cloning, germ-line engineering, gene therapy and genetic engineering. <\/p>\n
In the long-term, when the science becomes available we intend to utilize transhuman technologies: nanotechnology, mind uploading, A\/I and other variations of ultra exo-tech. <\/p>\n
Our goal is to enable total and unlimited self-transformation, consciousness and expansion across the universe of our species. <\/p>\n
It also states note the key words - Transhuman Technologies... and the embracing of transhumanism and extropy. <\/p>\n
We Define neo-eugenics as conscious evolution (these words are interchangeable). Purposefully directed evolution via voluntary positive neo-eugenics (including voluntary selective breeding), cloning, genetic engineering and ultimately any and all transhuman technologies. Neo-Eugenics means harnessing all science, technology and knowledge available now or in the future, guiding it with spirituality, ethical considerations and higher consciousness, ultimately towards achieving total and unlimited self transformation. The term Neo-Eugenics embodies the sciences and philosophies involved in Biotechnology, Extropy and Transhumanism all merged in a philosophy of spiritual Conscious Evolution. <\/p>\n
http:\/\/prometheism.net\/principles.htm<\/a> <\/p>\n I believe removing prometheism from this page, will be cause to bring this issue to arbitration to confirm that the individual who keeps removing it obviously is biased and lacks an understanding of what transhumanism. NPOV. thats your problem brian NPOV and blatant bias. <\/p>\n Dnagod 22:22, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC) <\/p>\n Extropy and a lot of the other sites listed under manifestos are linked else where in the article, so I felt it important to also include these manifestos <\/p>\n Please do not revert to childish insults, and a biased personal agenda removing these links, they belong their and represent Principles which I dare say are some of the most interesting, fascinating and creative principles. <\/p>\n Don't abuse your privileges here and force your agenda on this topic of transhumanism, all perspectives are welcome here whether you like it or not. <\/p>\n Dnagod 17:26, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC) <\/p>\n What makes you think transtopianism (transtopia.org) is not secular? <\/p>\n STOP removing these links, you are biased, emotional, unfair, unbalanced and lacking in neutrality. <\/p>\n These links are to stay, and you have no right to remove them. They are valid and legit links, Do not abuse your privileges on this project or you will be revoked. <\/p>\n Dnagod 02:55, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) <\/p>\n The man who invented the word Transhumanism (Huxley), was an open, avid and published advocate of state sponsored coercive eugenics, selective breeding, and elitist eugenic communities. Therefore you are wrong, and thus the specific issue of VOLUNTARY eugenics does NOT violate in anyway, shape or form, being part of transhumanism. You are wrong, biased, unfair, unbalanced, and lacking in neutrality. Transtopia.org and prometheism.net DO NOT SUPPORT COERCIVE EUGENICS in their PRINCIPLES, THEY SUPPORT VOLUNTARY - EUGENICS - READ VOLUNTARY. Forgive the capitalization, but I do that for emphasis, not to scream. <\/p>\n please stop removing these links, you are biased, emotional, unfair, unbalanced and lacking in neutrality. These are not personal attacks, these are stated facts that you have not read the prometheism.net web site. <\/p>\n These links are to stay, and you have no right to remove them. They are valid and legit links, Do not abuse your privileges on this project. <\/p>\n I ask you to bring arbitration and discussion on this fact. Your censorship, bias and personal agenda will not win. Go to prometheism.net right now and find one place on this site that says prometheism supports COERCIVE EUGENICS. you will not find it anywhere. Prometheism.net clearly states that it only supports voluntary eugenics. Read the sworn oath on prometheism.net <\/p>\n The Sworn Oath of Prometheism (front page of prometheism.net) <\/p>\n We Prometheans are voluntarily coming together to purposefully direct the creation of a new post-human species. A species with higher intellect, creativity, consciousness and love of ones people. A communion of intellect and beauty, for the simple reason that it can be done. This creation is what gives us purpose and meaning. No other justification is required for this program to advance our Promethean species. <\/p>\n Next I want you to read the Principles of prometheism http:\/\/www.prometheism.net\/principles.htm<\/a> <\/p>\n 2. Our Promethean Species embraces Conscious Evolution <\/p>\n Our immediate aim is to create a neo-eugenically enhanced race that will eventually become a new, superior species with whatever scientific means are available at the present time. In the short-term, this will be achieved via neo-eugenics, ie. voluntary positive eugenics, human cloning, germ-line engineering, gene therapy and genetic engineering. <\/p>\n 5. Total Freedom, Liberty and Self-Determination <\/p>\n Our Libertarian religious nation is founded on the principles of total freedom of speech (including offensive language and language which hurts peoples feelings), freedom of thought, the right to bear arms, liberty, progress, productivity and the pursuit of individual happiness. <\/p>\n nation is VOLUNTARY ONLY. We REJECT all totalitarianism and believe COERCIVE neo-eugenics is counter to the ideal of individual freedom. The promethean governments sole purpose is to protect the rights of the individual. We DO NOT wish to STERILIZE anyone or FORCE anyone to practice neo-eugenics. <\/p>\n DNA or genetic capital is the most valuable commodity in the universe. Our primary goal is to promote positive and voluntary neo-eugenics by channeling national resources to the best, brightest and most creative. <\/p>\n We Define neo-eugenics as conscious evolution (these words are interchangeable). Purposefully directed evolution via voluntary positive neo-eugenics (including voluntary selective breeding), cloning, genetic engineering and ultimately any and all transhuman technologies. Neo-Eugenics means harnessing all science, technology and knowledge available now or in the future, guiding it with spirituality, ethical considerations and higher consciousness, ultimately towards achieving total and unlimited self transformation. The term Neo-Eugenics embodies the sciences and philosophies involved in Biotechnology, Extropy and Transhumanism all merged in a philosophy of spiritual Conscious Evolution. <\/p>\n This is from the principles of prometheism.net Last Updated: 3\/13\/03 this means that prometheism is NOT FRINGE, it does not support the fringe philosophy of FORCED COERCIVE EUGENICS. Again the capitalization is not screaming, its meant to provide emphasis. Also my comments about you not being very knowledgeable about prometheism.net and transtopia.org are not meant as personal insults or personal attacks, but as an observation. <\/p>\n Dnagod 20:06, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Read more here: <\/p>\n Talk:Transhumanism\/Archive 2 - Wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Split long article Might this longish entry be better presented as a series of pages? JasonS 03:34 Jan 13, 2003 (UTC) Dnagod 20:56, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC) In the interest of ensuring transhuman is NPOV: Who decides what the definition of transhumanism is? This element of humanism, is that from huxley or someone else? Continue reading