Appearing before reporters earlier this week to explain that the Liberal government would be putting its authority behind a Liberal MP's motion calling for a parliamentarycondemnation and study of Islamophobia,Heritage Minister Melanie Joly said a \"question of leadership\" was at hand. <\/p>\n
Shereturned to the theme Thursday as she explainedwhy the Liberals would not support a Conservative counter-proposalthat drops references to Islamophobia in favour of a general focus on religious discrimination. <\/p>\n
\"Those of us in leadership positions have a social responsibility to take a strong stance on these matters, to be clear, to be courageous, to lead,\" she said. <\/p>\n
There were echoes here of something Justin Trudeau said two weeks ago when he rose inthe House of Commons to addressthe shooting at a mosque in Quebec City that left six men dead. <\/p>\n
\"I want to remind each and every one of my 337 colleagues that we are all leaders in our communities,\" the prime ministersaid. \"It is at times like these that our communities need our leadership the most.\" <\/p>\n
People attend a vigil on Jan. 30 for victims of the deadly mosque shooting in Quebec City. (Ryan Remiorz\/Canadian Press) <\/p>\n
So, at a moment of anxiety, the Liberals see a moment to define leadership. <\/p>\n
Conservatives, meanwhile, have drawn a line under Islamophobia and want to see the word defined. <\/p>\n
But, beyond the semantics of Motion 103, the Conservatives now seem in danger of being defined by theloudest voices of objection in their midst. <\/p>\n
M-103was tabledin December, following an e-petition on the same topicposted in June. <\/p>\n
Less than two months after Liberal MP Iqra Khalid brought the motion forward, a gunman opened fire during prayers at the Quebec Islamic Cultural Centre. And in the Houseon Thursday, Joly could cite a list of other hateful acts. <\/p>\n
Still, the motion came to the floor of the House for debate this week with loud voices of opposition claiming that an attack on free speech is at hand. <\/p>\n
The motion requests that the heritage committee conduct a study ofIslamophobiaand religious discrimination and provide recommendations for how the government could respond to such prejudice. To critics, thisisthe first step toward a prohibition against any criticism of Islamic practice or belief. <\/p>\n
Some Conservative MPs allowed the House to unanimously adopt a motioncondemning Islamophobia in October on a quick voice vote. But now Conservatives are concerned thatIslamophobianeeds to be defined: aliteral reading of the word would suggest that criticism ofthe religion, not merely its adherents, is at issue. <\/p>\n
During debate on Wednesday, Khalid and the Conservative critic, David Anderson, actually offered similar definitions: \"the irrational hatred of Muslims that leads to discrimination\" and \"hatred against Muslims,\" respectively. <\/p>\n
Saskatchewan Conservative MP David Anderson tabled a counter-proposal to Motion 103 that focuses on all religious discrimination, rather than Islamophobia specifically. (CBC) <\/p>\n
ButKhalidhasn't added that to her motion. And the Conservative proposal, tabled by Anderson on Thursday, suggests merely focusing on all religious discrimination instead. <\/p>\n
Jolydismissed thatas a\"watered down\" and \"cynical\" offer,meant to cover up internal Conservative divisions. She insistedMPs shouldn't be afraid to say the word. <\/p>\n
Rising shortly after question period to address the Conservative motion,Khalidread aloud the threats and hateshe has been subjected to. <\/p>\n
\"lslamophobiais real,\" she said. <\/p>\n
Motion 103 is another opportunity for Trudeau to embrace thelatest flashpoint in the long story of Canadian multiculturalism: the immigration, integration and acceptance of those of the Muslim faith. <\/p>\n
As a candidate for leadership of the Liberal Party,Trudeauaddressed an Islamic conferenceand used the opportunity todiscuss Wilfrid Laurier's efforts tounite cultures and religions. <\/p>\n
Two years later, in March 2015, he used alongaddress on liberty and diversityto condemnthe Conservative government's attempt to ban the niqab during the swearing of the citizenship oath. <\/p>\n
The election campaign that brought Trudeau's Liberals to government was then defined, in part, by the niqab and Conservative proposals tostripcitizenship from dual nationals when convicted of terrorism and to create a hotline for reporting \"barbaric cultural practices.\" <\/p>\n
Celebrating his victory on election night,Trudeau recalled his encounter with a Muslim woman in a hijabwho told him of her hope that her child wouldn'tbe a second-class citizen. <\/p>\n
Justin Trudeau gives his election victory speech in Montreal on Oct. 19, 2015. (Jim Young\/Reuters) <\/p>\n
There are philosophical underpinnings toTrudeau's thinking based on the guarantees of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, an argument that diversity creates strength and an acknowledgement that core values must persist alongside multiculturalism but an outspoken commitment to pluralismhas also become a powerful piece of Trudeau's brand. <\/p>\n
All the more so now that Donald Trump, Brexit and tensions in Europe seem to cast doubt on the success of multiculturalism. <\/p>\n
Conservative leadership contender Michael Chong has voiced support for Motion 103, but four of his rivalshave touted their opposition in fundraising appeals. Kellie Leitch created a website, with an image from the October 2014 attack on Parliament Hill visible in the background, where those who oppose the motion can sign a petition. <\/p>\n
Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch created a website to organize opposition to Motion 103. (Paul Chiasson\/Canadian Press) <\/p>\n
Speakingin the House on Thursday, Joly took aim at those actions and the appearance offour Conservative leadership candidates at a \"freedom rally\" organized by a conservative activist to defend free speech and \"stand against sharia law in this country.\" <\/p>\n
At that rally on Wednesday night, the organizer, Ezra Levant,warned that the prime minister was pursuing\"massive unvetted, un-integrateable Muslim migration.\" <\/p>\n
Any Conservative who believes their party's losses in 2015 werelinked to theniqab, \"barbaric cultural practices\" and citizenship revocation might see reason to worry in all that. <\/p>\n
And the Liberals are pressing the issue. <\/p>\n
On Thursday, several Liberal MPs tweeted a link to Trudeau's speech on the niqab. Video of the remarks was then posted to the prime minister's account. <\/p>\n
By late in the afternoon, two Liberals had tweeted a graphic touting that \"condemning hate is as Canadian as\" maple syrup, the charter and Tim Horton's. <\/p>\n
\"Call your MP and say yes to #M103,\" it reads.\"#MakeItAwkward.\" <\/p>\n
The serious matters of justice and dignity are no doubt difficult to separate from the politics of the situation. <\/p>\n
In terms of leadership, it is to wonder whether some kind of compromise, perhaps merelyadding a definition to the existing text of Motion 103, might result in a more united expression of support <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to see the original:<\/p>\n
Anti-Islamophobia debate might define both Liberals and Conservatives - CBC.ca<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Appearing before reporters earlier this week to explain that the Liberal government would be putting its authority behind a Liberal MP's motion calling for a parliamentarycondemnation and study of Islamophobia,Heritage Minister Melanie Joly said a \"question of leadership\" was at hand. Shereturned to the theme Thursday as she explainedwhy the Liberals would not support a Conservative counter-proposalthat drops references to Islamophobia in favour of a general focus on religious discrimination. Continue reading