The French Presidential Election has so far been the election of the third man. On Sunday 5 February, Benot Hamon, a short-lived minister for education under Franois Hollande, became the official candidate of the Socialist party. Much like Franois Fillon in the opposing right-wing Republican primaries, he had entered the race as the distant third. Nevertheless, hebeat the early frontrunner, former Prime Minister Manuel Valls, in the second round of the Socialist primaries, gaining almost 60 per cent of the vote. <\/p>\n
This was a triumph of the radical left over the establishment. Hamon had left Valls governmentto protest against what they took to be the governments too pro-business line. When it came to the primaries, he advocated a universal basic income and fully integrating ecological concerns into his programme. <\/p>\n
In this two-pronged strategy, too, he followed Fillons lead. The Republican candidate overtook the frontrunners former Prime Minister Alain Jupp and President Nicolas Sarkozy after campaigning on both a highly economically liberal and socially conservative Catholic programme. <\/p>\n
Both these victories on the left and right prove an old saying about primaries - they are won at the extremes. But there is another old saying, that general elections are won at the centre. <\/p>\n
Emmanuel Macronis the centrist candidate for the Presidential election. He also entered the race as the third man, behind frontrunners Marine Le Pen and Fillon. So can he win? <\/p>\n
With an election marked by a high level of unpredictability, there are nevertheless a number of reasons to think so. First there is Macron himself. When he entered the race, many thoughthe would quickly run out of steam, as centrist candidates have in the past, but his \"Forward\" movement has been highly successful. The crowds it attracts, numbering thousands, are the envy of the other candidates. <\/p>\n
Macron's decision to not participate in the French Socialist primaries was also very astute. It means he hasdissociated himself from the toxic legacy of the Hollande Presidency, which has already lead to the downfall of his rival, Valls. Indeed, the fact that Hamon, on the left of the Socialists, won the primary is another boon for him. Centre-left voters who would have supported Valls arenow likely to rally around him. <\/p>\n
If the centre-left has opened for Macron, so has the centre-right. Conservative voters who supported the centrist Alain Jupp might be tempted to join him, particularly after the \"Penelopegate\" scandal that has engulfedFillon (the Republican candidate is facing an investigation over claims he paid his wife nearly 1m for a job she did not do). Previously the favourite to win in the second round of elections in May, Fillon now trailsin the polls behind Macron in third place. <\/p>\n
Marine Le Pen, the leader of the far-right Front National,is engulfed in her own \"fake jobs\" scandal concerning her European Parliamentassistant, and she has been sanctioned by the European Parliament which is retaining part of her salary.But it is unlikely that such a scandal will dent her popularity, and she remains well ahead in the polls with 25 per centof first-round voting intentions. <\/p>\n
The difference between Le Pen and Fillon is that, as an anti-establishment and anti-European party,the Front National will not suffer from the misuse of public funds from an institution it rejects. Fillon, however, had made a big show of his strong moral principlesin the primaries compared to the \"affaires\" that continue to plague Jupp and former President Nicolas Sarkozy. Conservative voters put off by Fillon and unwilling to vote for the FN can rally round Macrons economic liberalism instead. <\/p>\n
If Macron can make it to the second round of the French Presidential election in May, then he has every chance of becoming Frances next president. Current predictions have him wining over 60 per cent of the second-round vote. But we are not there yet. As a young, intelligent and outside candidate, he remains the receptacle of many peoples longing for a renewal of the political class. But he needs to transform his movements dynamic into hard votes - he lags well behind other candidates when it comes to firm intentions of voting. To do so he must give details of his political programme, which he so far failed to do, and which he is coming under increasing pressure to deliver. <\/p>\n
The other threat he faces is the unification of the left with the far-left. If Hamon and the firebrand Jean-Luc Mlanchon could come together to form a common ticket then they could muster up to 25 per cent of the vote, which would propel them to first place in the first round of voting. <\/p>\n
What Macron has made clear is that he is pro-European, which starkly marks him out from the other candidates. He is a social, economic and political liberal, and is willing to endorse ideas from across the political spectrum - one of his mottos is that he is neither left nor right. In an age when the political centre has come under intense pressure, maybe a radical centrist is precisely what France needs. <\/p>\n
Dr Hugo Drochon is a historian of political thought and an affiliated lecturer at the University of Cambridge. He is the author of the book Nietzsche's Great Politics,published 2016. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See the original post here: <\/p>\n
Can Emmanuel Macron win? Why France is ripe for a liberal resurgence - New Statesman<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" The French Presidential Election has so far been the election of the third man. On Sunday 5 February, Benot Hamon, a short-lived minister for education under Franois Hollande, became the official candidate of the Socialist party. Much like Franois Fillon in the opposing right-wing Republican primaries, he had entered the race as the distant third. Continue reading