Clay Calvert Professor and Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL This post is hosted on the Huffington Post's Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site. If you need to flag this entry as abusive, send us an email. <\/p>\n
The aftermath of Donald J. Trumps stunning victory over Hillary Clinton brought with it much handwringing in news media circles and on social media platforms about the dangers of fake news. Some blame fake news for causing Clintons defeat, with the erstwhile candidate herself calling it an epidemic. <\/p>\n
But theres a major paradox when it comes to peoples beliefs about fake news. <\/p>\n
Specifically, many of us tend to believe that we can spot fake news we wont be fooled by it but others out there, who are more naive and less media savvy than us, surely will be duped. <\/p>\n
For instance, a December 2016 survey conducted by the Pew Research Center found that most Americans <\/p>\n
Yet despite the fact that some 84% of those surveyed were either very or somewhat confident in their own ability to spot fake news, 64% of the same people say fabricated news stories cause a great deal of confusion about the basic facts of current issues and events. This sense is shared widely across incomes, education levels, partisan affiliations and most other demographic characteristics. <\/p>\n
In other words, Im no fool, but others are! <\/p>\n
If thats truly the case, then why are we so worried about fake news? A few high-profile incidents like the Pizzagate shooting perhaps have caused undue panic. <\/p>\n
The notion that Im no fool, but others are is, in fact, consistent with what communication scholars call the third-person effect. As W. Phillips Davison, the theorys founder, summed it up in a 1983 article <\/p>\n
The danger here, as I explain in a new article published in the Wake Forest Law Review Online, is that individuals who exhibit signs of the third-person effect are also prone to call for censorship of media content in the name of protecting others. This, of course, raises serious First Amendment concerns regarding free speech. In other words, the third-person effect has both a perceptual aspect (what we believe about the influence of messages) and a behavioral component (censorship). <\/p>\n
For example, a scholarly study on support for censorship of rap music found that those surveyed <\/p>\n
Ultimately, consideration of the third-person effect might help to tamp down some of the rampant frets and fears about fake news. And if it does something more than that, as I argue in my article, the third-person effect should give lawmakers serious reason to take a thoughtful and deliberate pause before proposing any bills aimed at the censorship of fake news. <\/p>\n
Remedies of educating people about how to spot fake news and publicly shaming fake news websites are far better alternatives than governmental censorship. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the rest here:<\/p>\n
Fake News, Censorship & the Third-Person Effect: You Can't Fool Me, Only Others! - Huffington Post<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Clay Calvert Professor and Brechner Eminent Scholar in Mass Communication, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL This post is hosted on the Huffington Post's Contributor platform. Contributors control their own work and post freely to our site Continue reading