{"id":208450,"date":"2017-02-16T18:00:16","date_gmt":"2017-02-16T23:00:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/trump-space-advisors-considering-hubble-servicing-mission-spaceflight-insider.php"},"modified":"2017-02-16T18:00:16","modified_gmt":"2017-02-16T23:00:16","slug":"trump-space-advisors-considering-hubble-servicing-mission-spaceflight-insider","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/space-flight\/trump-space-advisors-considering-hubble-servicing-mission-spaceflight-insider.php","title":{"rendered":"Trump space advisors considering Hubble servicing mission &#8211; SpaceFlight Insider"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      Bart Leahy    <\/p>\n<p>      February 16th, 2017    <\/p>\n<p>      The Hubble Space Telescope as seen by the departing STS-125      crew after a week servicing the observatory in 2009. Photo      Credit: NASA    <\/p>\n<p>    The Wall Street Journal     reports that Trump    administrationadvisers are considering a public-private    crewed mission aboard the Sierra Nevada Corporation    (SNC)Dream    Chaser spacecraft to keep the aging Hubble    Space Telescope (HST)    operational. The proposed mission, which would not happen    before 2019, would require support from the next NASA    administrator.  <\/p>\n<p>      The crew variant of Dream Chaser. Image Credit: Sierra Nevada      Corporation    <\/p>\n<p>    The Journal suggested the mission would align well    with the Trump administrations desire to advance    public-private partnerships while also advancingmissions    that could be accomplished within the presidents current    four-year term.  <\/p>\n<p>    According to the Journal story, Mark Sirangelo, head    of SNCs space systems unit, told a conference last week that    Dream Chaser could be used as an exploration vehicle, a    free-flight science laboratory and a servicing vehicle for    in-orbit satellites and spacecraft. Additionally, an SNC    representative stated that Dream Chaser was designed from the    beginning to be a multi-mission orbital transportation system    eventually targeting servicing, repair and assembly of    technology in space.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Journal story also stated that    updatingHubblewould require relatively few    additional dollars because the telescope has a modular design    and Dream Chasers cargo variant already is undergoing flight    tests. The vehicle would need additional life-support systems    as well as a launch abort system designed to protect the crew    in the event of an explosion or serious problem on the pad or    during early phases of its ascent.  <\/p>\n<p>    However, before Dream Chaser can be sent to chase Hubble in its    335-mile (539-kilometer) orbit, it first has to fly into space.  <\/p>\n<p>    SNC is still conducting development and testing activities on    the spacecraft at NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center in    California as part of its Commercial Resupply Services    contract. Another glide test of the vehicle is scheduled for    spring     2017, with the first cargo launch to the    International Space Station scheduled for sometime in 2019.  <\/p>\n<p>    Having launched aboard the Space Shuttle Discovery on    STS-31 in 1990, Hubbles primary mirror was discovered to have    improperly manufactured optics, requiring its first servicing    mission. That mission,STS-61,    launched aboard Shuttle Endeavor in 1993. It corrected    the optics and installed additional instruments to support the    telescopes science mission.  <\/p>\n<p>      Hubble Space Telescope being lifted from the payload bay of      Atlantis following repairs during STS-125. Photo      Credit: NASA    <\/p>\n<p>    Four subsequent missions in 1997, 1999, 2002, and 2009 replaced    items such as spectrographs, thermal insulation, gyroscopes,    batteries, computers, and other components.  <\/p>\n<p>    With these repairs, James Jeletic, deputy project manager of    Hubble operations at NASAs Goddard Space Flight Center, told        CBS News in 2013 that he believed Hubble    could operate up to 2020.  <\/p>\n<p>    Without a reboost, Hubblewill re-enter Earths atmosphere    sometime between 2030 and 2040.  <\/p>\n<p>    Dream Chasers availability aside, the question remains: Is a    sixth mission to Hubble a good investment of NASAs time and    limited budget?  <\/p>\n<p>    Jim Muncy, a long-time space lobbyist with PoliSpace and senior    adviser to the Commercial Spaceflight Federation, told    Spaceflight Insider:  <\/p>\n<p>      I think the concept of using a commercial crewed vehicle      to service Hubble makes a lot of sense. Its good to see SNC      thinking creatively they have always talked about      DreamChaser as a platform as well as a crew\/cargo      transporter, so this makes sense. Its not clear to me      whether or not a Dragon or Starliner could carry out the same      sort of mission.The SNCs cargo variants      expendable mission module could make for a great airlock to      allow crew to egress.But none of these vehicles have an      arm for grappling Hubble [] so youd have to do some      interesting EVA work to tether them together.    <\/p>\n<p>    When asked if Hubbles role could be supplemented by existing    ground-based telescopes, Dr. Tom Brown, Mission Head of the    Hubble Space Telescope, told Spaceflight Insider:  <\/p>\n<p>      Hubble is currently performing well, and it provides      unique capabilities that are not achievable from any ground      facility in existence or planned (e.g., ultraviolet imaging      and spectroscopy, high-resolution optical imaging with low      backgrounds).We expect Hubble to provide these      capabilities for at least a few years of overlap with the      upcoming mission of the James Webb Space Telescope, launching      in late 2018. Beyond that, the Space Telescope Science      Institute has no official position regarding the servicing of      Hubble to extend its lifetime.    <\/p>\n<p>    Dr. Garth Illingworth, an astronomer at the Lick Observatory,    has used Hubble to study the formation of galaxies.    Regardingthe potential worth of a Hubble servicing    mission. Dr. Illingworthtold Spaceflight    Insider:  <\/p>\n<p>      The question of the worth of another servicing mission      hinges on a careful evaluation of the capabilities of the      upcomingWFIRST[Wide Field      Infrared Survey Telescope] Hubble-like telescope (similar      in size) and on what we would do differently with      Hubble. I have heard some interesting ideas for      instruments that would be great to have on Hubble. While I      might love to have Hubble serviced again, one needs a      hard-nosed evaluation of the science that would be gained to      decide if it is worth the cost.    <\/p>\n<p>      What we would try to do in space for astrophysics      depends a lot of what is judged to lead to the most      interesting scientific results. This is always a topic of      much discussion among scientists. And ultimately we look to      the Decadal Survey to establish our priorities.    <\/p>\n<p>      While JWST is not serviceable, we expect that most      future telescopes will be potentially serviceable. Current      plans are to make WFIRST serviceable []. And larger future      telescopes beyond will surely be serviceableand maybe even      will be assembled and tested in space by astronauts and      robotic capability.    <\/p>\n<p>    The James WebbSpace Telescope (JWST),    Hubbles designated successor observatory, is scheduled to    launch to the Earth-Sun L2    Lagrange point aboard an Ariane 5 rocket in 2018. One argument    for updating Hubble is that could serve as a backup space    telescope in case JWST suffers a failure of some kind.  <\/p>\n<p>    As Illingworth noted, unlike Hubble, JWSTis not designed    to be serviced in space.Lynn Chandler with NASAs JWST    Communications group told Spaceflight Insider,  <\/p>\n<p>      In the early days of the Webb project, studies were      conducted to evaluate the benefits, practicality and cost of      servicing Webb either by human space flight, by robotic      missions, or by some combination such as retrieval to      low-Earth orbit. Those studies concluded that the potential      benefits of servicing do not offset the increases in mission      complexity, mass and cost that would be required to make Webb      serviceable, or to conduct the servicing mission      itself.    <\/p>\n<p>    Whether NASA decides to pursue this commercial Hubble servicing    mission will be up to the next agency administrator. As with    any new presidential administration, the answer, for now, is    wait and see.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Tagged: Dream Chaser Hubble Space Telescope James Webb Space Telescope Lead Stories NASA Sierra Nevada Corporation  <\/p>\n<p>      Bart Leahy is a freelance technical writer living in Orlando,      Florida. Leahy's diverse career has included work for The      Walt Disney Company, NASA, the Department of Defense, Nissan,      a number of commercial space companies, small businesses,      nonprofits, as well as the Science Cheerleaders.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.spaceflightinsider.com\/missions\/space-observatories\/trump-space-advisors-considering-hubble-servicing-mission\/\" title=\"Trump space advisors considering Hubble servicing mission - SpaceFlight Insider\">Trump space advisors considering Hubble servicing mission - SpaceFlight Insider<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Bart Leahy February 16th, 2017 The Hubble Space Telescope as seen by the departing STS-125 crew after a week servicing the observatory in 2009. Photo Credit: NASA The Wall Street Journal reports that Trump administrationadvisers are considering a public-private crewed mission aboard the Sierra Nevada Corporation (SNC)Dream Chaser spacecraft to keep the aging Hubble Space Telescope (HST) operational <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/space-flight\/trump-space-advisors-considering-hubble-servicing-mission-spaceflight-insider.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-space-flight"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208450"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208450"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208450\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}