{"id":208232,"date":"2017-02-15T10:45:18","date_gmt":"2017-02-15T15:45:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/4-possible-roadmaps-for-macos-and-ios-evolution-the-mac-observer-blog.php"},"modified":"2017-02-15T10:45:18","modified_gmt":"2017-02-15T15:45:18","slug":"4-possible-roadmaps-for-macos-and-ios-evolution-the-mac-observer-blog","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/evolution\/4-possible-roadmaps-for-macos-and-ios-evolution-the-mac-observer-blog.php","title":{"rendered":"4 Possible Roadmaps For macOS and iOS Evolution &#8211; The Mac Observer (blog)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    From time to time, weve seen scenarios about how the Mac\/macOS    and the iPad\/iOS might evolve as personal computing platforms.    We know about the declining sales of the iPad and Apples    seeming inattention to the Mac line as whole in 2016. In turn,    that has created some discussion about their respective future    developments. John catalogs the likely and not-so-likely    roadmaps for these products.  <\/p>\n<p>      What looked like simple evolution has become not so simple.    <\/p>\n<p>    Each of these plans below is someting Ive read or thought    about.Theyre in no particular order, but I have assigned    a prognosis for each plan. There may be other brilliant plans    being cooked up by Apple, but I thought it would interesting to    list the most often discussed evolutionary scenarios for macOS,    iOS and possible integration. Here we go.  <\/p>\n<p>    Plan A. Let it Be. Or: Survival of the    fittest. The Intel-based Macs and iPads are allowed to    continue as distinct products. They will evolve to work better    and better together, and weve seen Apple do that already. But    the products remain essentially as they are. Apple will,    instead, depend on dramatic improvements in iOS\/iPad    technologies to stem the decline on iPad sales.  <\/p>\n<p>    Eventually, an inflection point will come when the iPad can do    everything the Mac does today. Then, the Mac, without touch    capability, fades into history. Downside. Thousands of great    macOS apps depend on Intel and Macs.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reference: Let    iPad be iPad: Why making it a traditional computer isnt the    answer, by Rene Ritchie.  <\/p>\n<p>    Likelihood: Low  <\/p>\n<p>    Plan B. Here Comes the Sun. Or: Intel    plus ARM. Slowly migrate macOS apps to run on ARM by    including low-power but fast ARM processor in all new Macs.    macOS and iOS, however, remain distinct. Gradually transition    more and more tasks to ARM until an Intel CPU is hardly    necessary in, say, five years. It helps reduce Apples    dependence on Intel. A possible gateway to Plan D.  <\/p>\n<p>    Reference: Apple    Said to Work on Mac Chip That Would Lessen Intel Role, by    Mark Gurman.  <\/p>\n<p>    Likelihood: Moderate  <\/p>\n<p>    Plan C. I Want to Hold Your Hand. Or:    The Toaster Fridge. Single out MacBooks that have ARM    in the lid and Intel under the keyboard. When connected, the    system operates as macOS\/Intel Mac with low power ARM    functions. When the lid is detached, its an iPad. Desktop,    Intel-based Macs will use and ARM for iOS simulator and other    supporting operations. One problem is continued dependence on    Intel CPUs. Another is cost, confusion and lack of elegance.  <\/p>\n<p>    Likelihood: Low.  <\/p>\n<p>    Plan D. Strawberry Fields Forever. macOS    apps run in iOS. New, much larger iPads will have a    Rosetta-like system with mouse and other needed frameworks    added back in. macOS apps remain Intel-based, run on standard    Macs, but can also run on large-display iPads. This continues    until Macs and macOS apps fade into history, as with the old    Classic apps.  <\/p>\n<p>    This is an attractive option because it avoids a premature    obsolescence of the Mac by allowing all those thousands of    macOS apps to have new life on the platform of the future, the    bigger iPads. It essentially competes with the ground-breaking    notion of the Microsoft Surface Studio and buys time for the    iPad to evolve. When the iPad reaches technical maturity and    can do everything a Mac can, including the role as an iOS    development platform, then the Mac can be left behind. In the    meantime, macOS apps remain viable.  <\/p>\n<p>    Likelihood: High. This is just the kind of technical brilliance    Apple is known for. They did it before with the Classic to Mac    OS X and the PowerPC to Intel transition. It combats the    Surface Studio nicely. Apples dependence on Intel goes away.  <\/p>\n<p>    So there you have it. My four roadmaps for the evolution of    macOS and iOS apart or together. What do you think? Have I    missed any attractive avenues? Or pitfalls?  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Here is the original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.macobserver.com\/analysis\/4-possible-roadmaps-macos-and-ios\/\" title=\"4 Possible Roadmaps For macOS and iOS Evolution - The Mac Observer (blog)\">4 Possible Roadmaps For macOS and iOS Evolution - The Mac Observer (blog)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> From time to time, weve seen scenarios about how the Mac\/macOS and the iPad\/iOS might evolve as personal computing platforms.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/evolution\/4-possible-roadmaps-for-macos-and-ios-evolution-the-mac-observer-blog.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[431596],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-208232","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-evolution"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208232"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=208232"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/208232\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=208232"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=208232"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=208232"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}