Just a quick post to show you how the slippery slopeslip slides away. <\/p>\n
Canadas Supreme Court imposed a nationwide regime on the entire country. An obedient Parliament passed enabling legislation, including safeguards to protect against abuse. <\/p>\n
Now, these supposedly vital protections in actuality, they are loosey-goosey are increasingly seen instead as hurdles that interfere with the right to be made dead. <\/p>\n
Heres an example from a journalists opinion column out of London, Ontario: <\/p>\n
Canadians should be forewarned that the road to a medically assisted death is paved with speed bumps and potholes: that the law and its regulations were hastily devised and are imperfect; that the supply of doctors who are both willing and competent enough to safely assist in a patients death is severely limited; and that the pathway to release from suffering can take unexpected and sometimes inexplicable detours. <\/p>\n
Our parliamentarians should look to improve the legislation sooner rather than later. <\/p>\n
These improvementswill likely include such culture-of-death agenda items as alegal mandate for MDs to participate in killing even if they have religious or moral objections an expansion of eligibility to specifically includenon-terminal conditions, and authority to kill Alzheimers patients who asked to be killed in an advance directive. <\/p>\n
We need to think about this as the assisted suicide argument unfolds here: Accepting euthanasia changes a societys collective consciousness. The impetus to protect life soon morphs into a drive to embrace death. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: <\/p>\n
Euthanasia 'Safeguards' Soon Seen as 'Hurdles' - National Review<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Just a quick post to show you how the slippery slopeslip slides away. Canadas Supreme Court imposed a nationwide regime on the entire country Continue reading