{"id":206490,"date":"2017-02-09T17:08:32","date_gmt":"2017-02-09T22:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/community-associations-and-the-second-amendment-lexology-registration.php"},"modified":"2017-02-09T17:08:32","modified_gmt":"2017-02-09T22:08:32","slug":"community-associations-and-the-second-amendment-lexology-registration","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/second-amendment-2\/community-associations-and-the-second-amendment-lexology-registration.php","title":{"rendered":"Community Associations and the Second Amendment &#8211; Lexology (registration)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution    guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms. The    Florida constitution contains a similar guarantee. With few    exceptions, Florida law allows licensed individuals to carry    concealed firearms in most public locations. Based on these    constitutional and statutory rights under U.S. and Florida law,    many owners residing in community associations believe that    they also have the right to conceal-carry firearms when on    their communitys common elements. In the absence of a    provision in the community associations governing documents,    owners may exercise their lawful right to carry concealed    firearms on common elements. However, who prevails when an    owners constitutional and statutory rights conflict with a    community associations attempts to regulate the carrying and    use of firearms on its common elements?  <\/p>\n<p>    Generally, a community associations power to regulate use of    common element property may be exercised so long as the    exercise is reasonable, is not violative of any constitutional    restrictions, and does not exceed any specific limitations set    out in the statute or the condominium documents. Juno by    the Sea North Condominium Assn (The Towers), Inc. v.    Manfredonia, 397 So.2d 297, at 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981).    Given the commonplace nature of limitations on firearms imposed    in other places either by private property owners or state and    federal law (schools, churches, bars, etc.), a Court would    likely determine that limitations on concealed-carry of    firearms on a community associations common elements is    reasonable. In GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687    F.3d 1244, 1265 (11th Cir. 2012), the Eleventh Circuit Court of    Appeals ruled that An individuals right to bear arms as    enshrined in the Second Amendment, whatever its full scope,    certainly must be limited by the equally fundamental right of a    private property owner to exercise exclusive dominion and    control over its land. Based on this holding, a Court would    also likely determine that a community association prohibition    on concealed-carry firearms on common element property is not    violative of owners second amendment constitutional rights. As    noted above, Florida law currently does not, as a general    matter, prohibit an owner of private property from regulating    the use of firearms on its property. Accordingly, absent a    provision in the community associations own governing    documents establishing a right of owners or guests to    conceal-carry on common elements, we believe that a community    association may generally regulate such use.  <\/p>\n<p>    Notwithstanding the general ability of community associations    to regulate firearms on common element property, such    regulations should be drafted with the community associations    particular circumstances in mind. For instance, Fla. Stat.     790.251 prohibits employers from preventing its employees,    contractors, volunteers, or other invitees from keeping a    firearm in a locked vehicle in a parking lot on the employers    property. To the extent a community association has employees,    Fla. Stat.  790.251 may apply to require the community    association to allow its employees, contractors, volunteers or    other invitees to keep firearms in their vehicles.    Additionally, regulations on firearms should be carefully    drafted to ensure that the regulations are proper in scope. For    example, if the community associations regulations on firearms    are so broad as to affect an owners ability to transfer and    keep firearms in his or her home, the regulation could be seen    as impermissibly preventing an owner from exercising his    fundamental constitutional right to maintain firearms in the    home for personal defense (as established by the U.S. Supreme    Courts decision in District of Columbia v. Heller,    554 U.S. 570 (2008)), which may subject the rule to    invalidation under the Juno by the Sea North    Condominium analysis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although a community association is generally authorized to    regulate the carrying and use of firearms on common element    property, the validity of a particular regulation will be    dependent on several factors discussed above. Accordingly, we    recommend that a community association seeking to impose    regulations on firearms consult with legal counsel to ensure    that the regulation is thoughtfully drafted and will withstand    scrutiny if challenged.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.lexology.com\/library\/detail.aspx?g=049e1e10-3f00-4ee4-92e0-4cab18878cb2\" title=\"Community Associations and the Second Amendment - Lexology (registration)\">Community Associations and the Second Amendment - Lexology (registration)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution guarantees individuals the right to keep and bear arms. The Florida constitution contains a similar guarantee.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/second-amendment-2\/community-associations-and-the-second-amendment-lexology-registration.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261460],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206490","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206490"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206490"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206490\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206490"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206490"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206490"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}