{"id":206390,"date":"2017-02-09T16:50:28","date_gmt":"2017-02-09T21:50:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/valuation-dashboard-healthcare-update-seeking-alpha.php"},"modified":"2017-02-09T16:50:28","modified_gmt":"2017-02-09T21:50:28","slug":"valuation-dashboard-healthcare-update-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/valuation-dashboard-healthcare-update-seeking-alpha.php","title":{"rendered":"Valuation Dashboard: Healthcare &#8211; Update &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    This article series provides a monthly dashboard of industries    in each sector of the GICS classification. It compares    valuation and quality factors relative to their historical    averages in each industry, and gives a list of 10 stocks. I    update every month 8 lists like this one covering all sectors    (some sectors are grouped). The 8 lists together have     returned about 25% in 2016. If you want to stay informed of    updates, click \"Follow\" at the top of this page. My     Marketplace Subscribers have an early access to the stock    lists before they are published in free-access articles.  <\/p>\n<p>    Executive summary  <\/p>\n<p>    Biotechnology looks cheap relative to its own historical    averages in valuation factors. Life Sciences Tools\/Services and    Managed Healthcare look slightly overpriced and above the    historical average in profitability (measured by ROE). Other    groups are less appealing. The Pharmaceutical industry is close    to the baseline in P\/E and undervalued for P\/FCF, but much    worse regarding P\/S and ROE. The worst group here and the only    healthcare industry with all factors worse than their    historical averages is Healthcare Equipment.  <\/p>\n<p>    Since last month:  <\/p>\n<p>    Some cheap stocks in their industries  <\/p>\n<p>    The stocks listed below are in the S&P 1500 index, cheaper    than their respective industry factor for Price\/Earnings,    Price\/Sales and Price\/Free Cash Flow. The companies with the    highest Return on Equity are kept in the final selection.  <\/p>\n<p>    This strategy rebalanced monthly has an annualized return about    22.34% for a 17-year backtest. The sector ETF XLV has an    annualized return of only 7.73% on the same period. Past    performance is not a guarantee of future result. This is not    investment advice. Do your own research before buying.  <\/p>\n<p>          ABBV        <\/p>\n<p>          AbbVie Inc        <\/p>\n<p>          BIOTECH        <\/p>\n<p>          ABC        <\/p>\n<p>          AmerisourceBergen Corp        <\/p>\n<p>          HCAREPROVID        <\/p>\n<p>          AMGN        <\/p>\n<p>          Amgen Inc        <\/p>\n<p>          BIOTECH        <\/p>\n<p>          BIIB        <\/p>\n<p>          Biogen Inc        <\/p>\n<p>          BIOTECH        <\/p>\n<p>          CAH        <\/p>\n<p>          Cardinal Health Inc        <\/p>\n<p>          HCAREPROVID        <\/p>\n<p>          GILD        <\/p>\n<p>          Gilead Sciences Inc        <\/p>\n<p>          BIOTECH        <\/p>\n<p>          MCK        <\/p>\n<p>          McKesson Corp        <\/p>\n<p>          HCAREPROVID        <\/p>\n<p>          PRXL        <\/p>\n<p>          PAREXEL International Corp        <\/p>\n<p>          MEDEQUIP        <\/p>\n<p>          UTHR        <\/p>\n<p>          United Therapeutics Corp        <\/p>\n<p>          BIOTECH        <\/p>\n<p>    Detail of Valuation and Quality indicators in    Healthcare on 2\/8\/2017  <\/p>\n<p>    I take 4 aggregate industry factors provided by portfolio123: Price\/Earnings (P\/E), Price to    sales (P\/S), Price to free cash flow (P\/FCF), Return on Equity    (ROE). My choice has been justified     here and     here. Their calculation aims at limiting the influence of    outliers and large caps. They are reference values for stock    picking, not for capital-weighted indices.  <\/p>\n<p>    For each factor I calculate the difference with its own    historical average: to the average for valuation ratios, from    the average for ROE, so that the higher is always the better.    The difference is measured in percentage for valuation ratios,    not for ROE (already in percentage).  <\/p>\n<p>    The next table reports the 4 industry factors. There are 3    columns for each factor: the current value, the average (\"Avg\")    between January 1999 and October 2015 taken as an arbitrary    reference of fair valuation, and the difference explained above    (\"D-xxx\").  <\/p>\n<p>          P\/E        <\/p>\n<p>          Avg        <\/p>\n<p>          D- P\/E        <\/p>\n<p>          P\/S        <\/p>\n<p>          Avg        <\/p>\n<p>          D- P\/S        <\/p>\n<p>          P\/FCF        <\/p>\n<p>          Avg        <\/p>\n<p>          D- P\/FCF        <\/p>\n<p>          ROE        <\/p>\n<p>          Avg        <\/p>\n<p>          D-ROE        <\/p>\n<p>          Health Care Equipment        <\/p>\n<p>          43.01        <\/p>\n<p>          27.18        <\/p>\n<p>          -58.24%        <\/p>\n<p>          4.01        <\/p>\n<p>          3.18        <\/p>\n<p>          -26.10%        <\/p>\n<p>          38.66        <\/p>\n<p>          30.51        <\/p>\n<p>          -26.71%        <\/p>\n<p>          -33.87        <\/p>\n<p>          -12.14        <\/p>\n<p>          -21.73        <\/p>\n<p>          Managed Health Care        <\/p>\n<p>          22.95        <\/p>\n<p>          20.88        <\/p>\n<p>          -9.91%        <\/p>\n<p>          1.04        <\/p>\n<p>          0.85        <\/p>\n<p>          -22.35%        <\/p>\n<p>          18.26        <\/p>\n<p>          17.75        <\/p>\n<p>          -2.87%        <\/p>\n<p>          8.28        <\/p>\n<p>          5.78        <\/p>\n<p>          2.5        <\/p>\n<p>          Health Care Technology*        <\/p>\n<p>          83.28        <\/p>\n<p>          56.13        <\/p>\n<p>          -48.37%        <\/p>\n<p>          3.06        <\/p>\n<p>          3.39        <\/p>\n<p>          9.73%        <\/p>\n<p>          35.12        <\/p>\n<p>          35.77        <\/p>\n<p>          1.82%        <\/p>\n<p>          -14.56        <\/p>\n<p>          -6.2        <\/p>\n<p>          -8.36        <\/p>\n<p>          Biotechnology        <\/p>\n<p>          27.8        <\/p>\n<p>          39.78        <\/p>\n<p>          30.12%        <\/p>\n<p>          31.94        <\/p>\n<p>          29.01        <\/p>\n<p>          -10.10%        <\/p>\n<p>          36.09        <\/p>\n<p>          43.74        <\/p>\n<p>          17.49%        <\/p>\n<p>          -68.17        <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4044226-valuation-dashboard-healthcare-update\" title=\"Valuation Dashboard: Healthcare - Update - Seeking Alpha\">Valuation Dashboard: Healthcare - Update - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> This article series provides a monthly dashboard of industries in each sector of the GICS classification. It compares valuation and quality factors relative to their historical averages in each industry, and gives a list of 10 stocks. I update every month 8 lists like this one covering all sectors (some sectors are grouped).  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/valuation-dashboard-healthcare-update-seeking-alpha.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206390"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206390\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}