{"id":206386,"date":"2017-02-09T16:50:26","date_gmt":"2017-02-09T21:50:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/best-and-worst-q117-health-care-etfs-and-mutual-funds-seeking-alpha.php"},"modified":"2017-02-09T16:50:26","modified_gmt":"2017-02-09T21:50:26","slug":"best-and-worst-q117-health-care-etfs-and-mutual-funds-seeking-alpha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/best-and-worst-q117-health-care-etfs-and-mutual-funds-seeking-alpha.php","title":{"rendered":"Best And Worst Q1&#8217;17: Health Care ETFs And Mutual Funds &#8211; Seeking Alpha"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Health Care sector ranks sixth out of the ten sectors as    detailed in our     Q1'17 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report.        Last quarter, the Health Care sector ranked seventh. It    gets our Neutral rating, which is based on an aggregation of    ratings of 22 ETFs and 74 mutual funds in the Health Care    sector. See a recap of our     Q4'16 Sector Ratings here.  <\/p>\n<p>    Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst rated ETFs and    mutual funds in the sector. Not all Health Care sector ETFs and    mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings    varies widely (from 21 to 364). This variation creates    drastically different investment implications and, therefore,    ratings.  <\/p>\n<p>    Investors seeking exposure to the Health Care sector should buy    one of the Attractive-or-better rated ETFs or mutual funds from    Figures 1 and 2.  <\/p>\n<p>    Here is our     ETF and mutual fund rating methodology, which leverages our    rigorous analysis of each fund's holdings. We think advisors    and investors focused on prudent investment decisions should    include analysis of fund holdings in their research process for    ETFs and mutual funds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings - Top    5  <\/p>\n<p>     * Best ETFs exclude ETFs with TNAs less than    $100 million for inadequate liquidity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings  <\/p>\n<p>    Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst    Ratings - Top 5  <\/p>\n<p>     * Best mutual funds exclude funds with TNAs    less than $100 million for inadequate liquidity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings  <\/p>\n<p>    Four mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their    total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet    our liquidity minimums.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Vanguard Health Care Index Fund (NYSEARCA:VHT) is the top-rated Health    Care ETF and the Putnam Global Health Care Fund (MUTF:PCHSX) is the top-rated    Health Care mutual fund. Both earn an Attractive rating.  <\/p>\n<p>    The State Street SPDR Series Trust (NYSEARCA:XBI) is the worst rated Health Care ETF    and the Invesco Global Health Care Fund (MUTF:GGHCX) is the worst    rated Health Care mutual fund. Both earn a Very Dangerous    rating.  <\/p>\n<p>    336 stocks of the 3000+ we cover are classified as Health Care    stocks, but due to style drift, Health Care ETFs and mutual    funds hold 364 stocks.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Danger Within  <\/p>\n<p>    Buying a fund without analyzing its holdings is like buying a    stock without analyzing its business and finances. Put another    way, research on fund holdings is necessary due diligence    because a fund's performance is only as good as its holdings'    performance. Don't just take our word for it, see what Barron's says on this matter.  <\/p>\n<p>    PERFORMANCE OF HOLDINGs = PERFORMANCE OF FUND  <\/p>\n<p>    Figures 3 and 4 show the rating landscape of all Health Care    ETFs and mutual funds.  <\/p>\n<p>    Figure 3: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst    ETFs  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings  <\/p>\n<p>    Figure 4: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the    Worst Mutual Funds  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>    Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings  <\/p>\n<p>    This article originally published here on January 23, 2017.  <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske and Kyle    Martone receive no compensation to write about any specific    stock, sector or theme.  <\/p>\n<p>    Disclosure: I\/we have no positions in any stocks    mentioned, and no plans to initiate any positions within the    next 72 hours.  <\/p>\n<p>    I wrote this article myself,    and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving    compensation for it. I have no business relationship with any    company whose stock is mentioned in this article.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/seekingalpha.com\/article\/4044327-best-worst-q117-health-care-etfs-mutual-funds\" title=\"Best And Worst Q1'17: Health Care ETFs And Mutual Funds - Seeking Alpha\">Best And Worst Q1'17: Health Care ETFs And Mutual Funds - Seeking Alpha<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Health Care sector ranks sixth out of the ten sectors as detailed in our Q1'17 Sector Ratings for ETFs and Mutual Funds report.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/best-and-worst-q117-health-care-etfs-and-mutual-funds-seeking-alpha.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206386"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206386\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}