{"id":206146,"date":"2017-02-08T15:09:32","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T20:09:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/comet-shoemakerlevy-9-wikipedia.php"},"modified":"2017-02-08T15:09:32","modified_gmt":"2017-02-08T20:09:32","slug":"comet-shoemakerlevy-9-wikipedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/comets-2\/comet-shoemakerlevy-9-wikipedia.php","title":{"rendered":"Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 &#8211; Wikipedia"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Comet ShoemakerLevy9 (formally designated    D\/1993F2) was a comet that broke apart in July 1992 and collided    with Jupiter in    July 1994, providing the first direct observation of an    extraterrestrial collision of Solar System objects.[2] This generated a large    amount of coverage in the popular media, and the comet was    closely observed by astronomers worldwide. The collision provided    new information about Jupiter and highlighted its role in    reducing space debris in the inner    Solar System.  <\/p>\n<p>    The comet was discovered by astronomers Carolyn and Eugene M. Shoemaker and David    Levy.[3]    ShoemakerLevy 9 had been captured by Jupiter and was orbiting    the planet at the time. It was located on the night of March    24, 1993 in a photograph taken with the 40cm (16in)    Schmidt    telescope at the Palomar Observatory in California. It was    the first comet observed to be orbiting a planet, and had    probably been captured by Jupiter around 2030 years earlier.  <\/p>\n<p>    Calculations showed that its unusual fragmented form was due to    a previous closer approach to Jupiter in July 1992. At that    time, the orbit of ShoemakerLevy 9 passed within Jupiter's    Roche    limit, and Jupiter's tidal forces had acted to pull apart the    comet. The comet was later observed as a series of fragments    ranging up to 2km (1.2mi) in diameter. These    fragments collided with Jupiter's southern hemisphere between    July 16 and July 22, 1994 at a speed of approximately    60km\/s (37mi\/s) or 216,000km\/h    (134,000mph). The prominent scars from the impacts were    more easily visible than the Great Red Spot and persisted for    many months.  <\/p>\n<p>    While conducting a program of observations designed to uncover    near-Earth objects, the Shoemakers and    Levy discovered Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 on the night of March    24, 1993 in a photograph taken with the 0.4m    (1.3ft) Schmidt telescope at the Palomar    Observatory in California. The comet was thus a serendipitous    discovery, but one that quickly overshadowed the results from    their main observing program.[4]  <\/p>\n<p>    Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 was the ninth periodic comet (a comet    whose orbital period is 200 years or less) discovered by the    Shoemakers and Levy, hence its name. It was their eleventh    comet discovery overall including their discovery of two    non-periodic comets, which use a different nomenclature. The    discovery was announced in IAU Circular 5725 on March 27, 1993.[3]  <\/p>\n<p>    The discovery image gave the first hint that comet    ShoemakerLevy 9 was an unusual comet, as it appeared to show    multiple nuclei in an elongated region about 50arcseconds long and 10arcseconds wide.    Brian    G. Marsden of the Central Bureau for    Astronomical Telegrams noted that the comet lay only about    4degrees from Jupiter as seen from Earth,    and that although this could of course be a line of sight    effect, its apparent motion in the sky suggested that it was    physically close to it.[3]    Because of this, he suggested that the Shoemakers and David    Levy had discovered the fragments of a comet that had been    disrupted by Jupiter's gravity.  <\/p>\n<p>    Orbital studies of the new comet soon revealed that it was    orbiting Jupiter    rather than the Sun, unlike    all other comets known at the time. Its orbit around Jupiter    was very loosely bound, with a period of about 2 years and an    apoapsis (the point in the orbit farthest from    the planet) of 0.33 astronomical units    (49,000,000km). Its orbit around the planet was highly    eccentric (e =    0.9986).[5]  <\/p>\n<p>    Tracing back the comet's orbital motion revealed that it had    been orbiting Jupiter for some time. It seems most likely that    it was captured from a solar orbit in the early 1970s, although    the capture may have occurred as early as the    mid-1960s.[6] Several    other observers found images of the comet in precovery images    obtained before March 24, including Kin Endate from a photograph exposed on    March 15, S.    Otomo on March 17, and a team led by Eleanor Helin from images on March    19.[7] No precovery images dating    back to earlier than March 1993 have been found. Before the    comet was captured by Jupiter, it was probably a short-period    comet with an aphelion just inside Jupiter's orbit, and    a perihelion interior to the asteroid    belt.[8]  <\/p>\n<p>    The volume of space within which an object can be said to orbit    Jupiter is defined by Jupiter's Hill sphere (also called the Roche    sphere). When the comet passed Jupiter in the late 1960s or    early 1970s, it happened to be near its aphelion, and found    itself slightly within Jupiter's Hill sphere. Jupiter's gravity    nudged the comet towards it. Because the comet's motion with    respect to Jupiter was very small, it fell almost straight    toward Jupiter, which is why it ended up on a Jupiter-centric    orbit of very high eccentricity that is to say, the    ellipse was nearly flattened out.[9]  <\/p>\n<p>    The comet had apparently passed extremely close to Jupiter on    July 7, 1992, just over 40,000km (25,000mi) above    its cloud topsa smaller distance than Jupiter's radius of    70,000km (43,000mi), and well within the orbit of    Jupiter's innermost moon Metis and the planet's Roche limit, inside    which tidal    forces are strong enough to disrupt a body held together    only by gravity.[9]    Although the comet had approached Jupiter closely before, the    July 7 encounter seemed to be by far the closest, and the    fragmentation of the comet is thought to have occurred at this    time. Each fragment of the comet was denoted by a letter of the    alphabet, from    \"fragment A\" through to \"fragment W\", a practice already    established from previously observed broken-up comets.[10]  <\/p>\n<p>    More exciting for planetary astronomers was that the best    orbital calculations suggested that the comet would pass within    45,000km (28,000mi) of the center of Jupiter, a    distance smaller than the planet's radius, meaning that there    was an extremely high probability that SL9 would collide with    Jupiter in July 1994.[11]    Studies suggested that the train of nuclei would plow into    Jupiter's atmosphere over a period of about five days.[9]  <\/p>\n<p>    The discovery that the comet was likely to collide with Jupiter    caused great excitement within the astronomical community and    beyond, as astronomers had never before seen two significant    Solar System bodies collide. Intense studies of the comet were    undertaken, and as its orbit became more accurately    established, the possibility of a collision became a certainty.    The collision would provide a unique opportunity for scientists    to look inside Jupiter's atmosphere, as the collisions were    expected to cause eruptions of material from the layers    normally hidden beneath the clouds.[5]  <\/p>\n<p>    Astronomers estimated that the visible fragments of SL9 ranged    in size from a few hundred metres to two kilometres across,    suggesting that the original comet may have had a nucleus up to    5km (3.1mi) acrosssomewhat larger than Comet    Hyakutake, which became very bright when it passed close to    the Earth in 1996. One of the great debates in advance of the    impact was whether the effects of the impact of such small    bodies would be noticeable from Earth, apart from a flash as    they disintegrated like giant meteors.[12] The most optimistic    prediction was that large, asymmetric ballistic fireballs would rise above the    limb of Jupiter and into sunlight to be visible from    Earth.[13]    Other suggested effects of the impacts were seismic    waves travelling across the planet, an increase in stratospheric    haze on the planet due to dust from the impacts, and an    increase in the mass of the Jovian ring system. However, given    that observing such a collision was completely unprecedented,    astronomers were cautious with their predictions of what the    event might reveal.[5]  <\/p>\n<p>    Anticipation grew as the predicted date for the collisions    approached, and astronomers trained terrestrial telescopes on    Jupiter. Several space observatories did the same, including    the Hubble Space Telescope, the    ROSAT X-ray-observing satellite, and    significantly the Galileo spacecraft, then on    its way to a rendezvous with Jupiter scheduled for 1995.    Although the impacts took place on the side of Jupiter hidden    from Earth, Galileo, then at a distance of 1.6AU    from the planet, was able to see the impacts as they occurred.    Jupiter's rapid rotation brought the impact sites into view for    terrestrial observers a few minutes after the    collisions.[15]  <\/p>\n<p>    Two other satellites made observations at the time of the    impact: the Ulysses spacecraft, primarily    designed for solar    observations, was pointed towards Jupiter from its location    2.6AU away, and the distant Voyager 2 probe, some 44AU from    Jupiter and on its way out of the Solar System following its    encounter with Neptune in 1989, was programmed to look for radio    emission in the 1390kHz range.[16]  <\/p>\n<p>    The first impact occurred at 20:13UTC on July 16, 1994, when    fragment A of the nucleus entered Jupiter's southern hemisphere    at a speed of about 60km\/s.[2] Instruments on    Galileo detected a fireball that    reached a peak temperature of about 24,000K, compared to the typical    Jovian cloudtop temperature of about 130K, before    expanding and cooling rapidly to about 1500K after    40s. The plume from the fireball quickly reached a height    of over 3,000km.[17] A few    minutes after the impact fireball was detected, Galileo    measured renewed heating, probably due to ejected material    falling back onto the planet. Earth-based observers detected    the fireball rising over the limb of the planet shortly after    the initial impact.[18]  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite published predictions,[13] astronomers had not    expected to see the fireballs from the impacts[19] and did not have any idea    in advance how visible the other atmospheric effects of the    impacts would be from Earth. Observers soon saw a huge dark    spot after the first impact. The spot was visible even in very    small telescopes, and was about 6,000km (3,700mi)    (one Earth radius) across. This and subsequent dark spots were    thought to have been caused by debris from the impacts, and    were markedly asymmetric, forming crescent shapes in front of    the direction of impact.[20]  <\/p>\n<p>    Over the next six days, 21 distinct impacts were observed, with    the largest coming on July 18 at 07:33 UTC when fragment G    struck Jupiter. This impact created a giant dark spot over    12,000km across, and was estimated to have released an    energy equivalent to 6,000,000megatons of    TNT (600 times the world's nuclear arsenal).[21] Two impacts 12hours apart    on July 19 created impact marks of similar size to that caused    by fragment G, and impacts continued until July 22, when    fragment W struck the planet.[22]  <\/p>\n<p>    Observers hoped that the impacts would give them a first    glimpse of Jupiter beneath the cloud tops, as lower material    was exposed by the comet fragments punching through the upper    atmosphere. Spectroscopic studies revealed    absorption lines in the Jovian spectrum    due to diatomic sulfur (S2) and carbon    disulfide (CS2), the first detection of either    in Jupiter, and only the second detection of S2 in    any astronomical object. Other molecules    detected included ammonia (NH3) and hydrogen    sulfide (H2S). The amount of sulfur implied by    the quantities of these compounds was much greater than the    amount that would be expected in a small cometary nucleus,    showing that material from within Jupiter was being revealed.    Oxygen-bearing    molecules such as sulfur dioxide were not detected, to the    surprise of astronomers.[23]  <\/p>\n<p>    As well as these molecules, emission from heavy atoms such as iron, magnesium and silicon was detected, with abundances    consistent with what would be found in a cometary nucleus.    Although a substantial amount of water was detected    spectroscopically, it was not as much as predicted beforehand,    meaning that either the water layer thought to exist below the    clouds was thinner than predicted, or that the cometary    fragments did not penetrate deeply enough.[24] The relatively low levels of    water were later confirmed by Galileo's atmospheric probe, which explored Jupiter's    atmosphere directly.  <\/p>\n<p>    As predicted beforehand, the collisions generated enormous    waves that swept across Jupiter at speeds of 450m\/s    (1,476ft\/s) and were observed for over two hours after    the largest impacts. The waves were thought to be travelling    within a stable layer acting as a waveguide, and some scientists thought    the stable layer must lie within the hypothesised tropospheric water    cloud. However, other evidence seemed to indicate that the    cometary fragments had not reached the water layer, and the    waves were instead propagating within the stratosphere.[25]  <\/p>\n<p>    Radio observations revealed a sharp increase in continuum emission at    a wavelength of 21cm after the largest impacts, which    peaked at 120% of the normal emission from the planet. This was    thought to be due to synchrotron radiation, caused    by the injection of relativistic electronselectrons with    velocities near the speed of lightinto the Jovian magnetosphere    by the impacts.[26]  <\/p>\n<p>    About an hour after fragment K entered Jupiter, observers    recorded auroral emission    near the impact region, as well as at the antipode of    the impact site with respect to Jupiter's strong magnetic    field. The cause of these emissions was difficult to    establish due to a lack of knowledge of Jupiter's internal    magnetic    field and of the geometry of the impact sites. One possible    explanation was that upwardly accelerating shock waves from the    impact accelerated charged particles enough to cause auroral    emission, a phenomenon more typically associated with    fast-moving solar    wind particles striking a planetary atmosphere near a    magnetic pole.[27]  <\/p>\n<p>    Some astronomers had suggested that the impacts might have a    noticeable effect on the Io torus, a torus of high-energy particles connecting Jupiter    with the highly volcanic moon Io. High resolution spectroscopic studies found    that variations in the ion density, rotational    velocity, and temperatures at the time of impact and    afterwards were within the normal limits.[28]  <\/p>\n<p>    Several models were devised to    compute the density and size of ShoemakerLevy 9. Its average    density was calculated to be about 0.5 g cm3; the    breakup of a much less dense comet would not have resembled the    observed string of objects. The size of the parent comet was    calculated to be about 1.8km in diameter.[29][30] These    predictions were among the few that were actually confirmed by    subsequent observation.[31]  <\/p>\n<p>    One of the surprises of the impacts was the small amount of    water revealed compared to prior predictions.[32] Before the impact, models of    Jupiter's atmosphere had indicated that the break-up of the    largest fragments would occur at atmospheric pressures of    anywhere from 30 kilopascals to a few tens of megapascals (from 0.3 to a few hundred    bar),[24] with some predictions that    the comet would penetrate a layer of water and create a bluish    shroud over that region of Jupiter.[12]  <\/p>\n<p>    Astronomers did not observe large amounts of water following    the collisions, and later impact studies found that    fragmentation and destruction of the cometary fragments in an    'airburst' probably occurred at much higher altitudes than    previously expected, with even the largest fragments being    destroyed when the pressure reached 250kPa (36psi),    well above the expected depth of the water layer. The smaller    fragments were probably destroyed before they even reached the    cloud layer.[24]  <\/p>\n<p>    The visible scars from the impacts could be seen on Jupiter for    many months. They were extremely prominent, and observers    described them as even more easily visible than the Great Red    Spot. A search of historical observations revealed that the    spots were probably the most prominent transient features ever    seen on the planet, and that although the Great Red Spot is    notable for its striking color, no spots of the size and    darkness of those caused by the SL9 impacts have ever been    recorded before.[33]  <\/p>\n<p>    Spectroscopic observers found that ammonia and carbon    disulfide persisted in the atmosphere for at least fourteen    months after the collisions, with a considerable amount of    ammonia being present in the stratosphere as opposed to its    normal location in the troposphere.[34]  <\/p>\n<p>    Counterintuitively, the atmospheric temperature dropped to    normal levels much more quickly at the larger impact sites than    at the smaller sites: at the larger impact sites, temperatures    were elevated over a region 15,000 to 20,000km (9,300 to    12,400mi) wide, but dropped back to normal levels within    a week of the impact. At smaller sites, temperatures    10K higher than    the surroundings persisted for almost two weeks.[35] Global stratospheric    temperatures rose immediately after the impacts, then fell to    below pre-impact temperatures 23weeks afterwards, before    rising slowly to normal temperatures.[36]  <\/p>\n<p>    SL9 is not unique in having orbited Jupiter for a time; five    comets, (including 82P\/Gehrels, 147P\/KushidaMuramatsu, and    111P\/HelinRomanCrockett)    are known to have been temporarily captured by the    planet.[37][38] Cometary orbits around Jupiter    are unstable, as they will be highly elliptical and likely to be strongly    perturbed by the Sun's gravity    at apojove (the furthest point on the orbit from the    planet).  <\/p>\n<p>    By far the most massive planet in the Solar System,    Jupiter can capture objects relatively frequently, but the size    of SL9 makes it a rarity: one post-impact study estimated that    comets 0.3km in diameter impact the planet once in    approximately 500 years and those 1.6km (0.99mi) in    diameter do so just once in every 6,000 years.[39]  <\/p>\n<p>    There is very strong evidence that comets have previously been    fragmented and collided with Jupiter and its satellites. During    the Voyager missions to the planet, planetary scientists    identified 13 crater chains on Callisto    and three on Ganymede, the origin of which was    initially a mystery.[40] Crater    chains seen on the Moon    often radiate from large craters, and are thought to be caused    by secondary impacts of the original ejecta, but the chains on    the Jovian moons did not lead back to a larger    crater. The impact of SL9 strongly implied that the chains were    due to trains of disrupted cometary fragments crashing into the    satellites.[41]  <\/p>\n<p>    On July 19, 2009, exactly 15 years after the SL9 impacts, a new    black spot about the size of the Pacific Ocean appeared in    Jupiter's southern hemisphere. Thermal infrared measurements    showed the impact site was warm and spectroscopic analysis    detected the production of excess hot ammonia and silica-rich    dust in the upper regions of Jupiter's atmosphere. Scientists    have concluded that another impact event had occurred, but this    time a more compact and strong object, probably a small    undiscovered asteroid, was the cause.[42]  <\/p>\n<p>    The impact of SL9 highlighted Jupiter's role as a \"cosmic    vacuum cleaner\" (or in deference to the ancients' planetary    correspondences to the major organs in the human body, a    \"cosmic liver\") for the inner Solar System. The planet's strong    gravitational influence leads to many small comets and asteroids colliding with    the planet, and the rate of cometary impacts on Jupiter is    thought to be between 2000-8000 times higher than the rate on    Earth.[43]  <\/p>\n<p>    The extinction of the dinosaurs at the end of the Cretaceous period is    generally thought to have been caused by the CretaceousPaleogene    impact event, which created the Chicxulub    crater,[44]    demonstrating that impacts are a serious threat to life on    Earth. Astronomers have speculated that without Jupiter to mop    up potential impactors, extinction events might have been more    frequent on Earth, and complex life might not have been able to    develop.[45]    This is part of the argument used in the Rare Earth hypothesis.  <\/p>\n<p>    In 2009, it was shown that the presence of a smaller planet at    Jupiter's position in the Solar System might increase the    impact rate of comets on the Earth significantly. A planet of    Jupiter's mass still seems to provide increased protection    against asteroids, but the total effect on all orbital bodies    within the Solar System is unclear.[46][47] Computer simulations in 2016    have continued to erode the theory.[48]  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View original post here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Comet_Shoemaker-Levy_9\" title=\"Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 - Wikipedia\">Comet ShoemakerLevy 9 - Wikipedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Comet ShoemakerLevy9 (formally designated D\/1993F2) was a comet that broke apart in July 1992 and collided with Jupiter in July 1994, providing the first direct observation of an extraterrestrial collision of Solar System objects.[2] This generated a large amount of coverage in the popular media, and the comet was closely observed by astronomers worldwide. The collision provided new information about Jupiter and highlighted its role in reducing space debris in the inner Solar System. The comet was discovered by astronomers Carolyn and Eugene M <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/comets-2\/comet-shoemakerlevy-9-wikipedia.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[182498],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206146","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comets-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206146"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206146"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206146\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206146"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206146"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206146"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}