{"id":206050,"date":"2017-02-08T14:46:55","date_gmt":"2017-02-08T19:46:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/south-dakota-considering-religious-freedom-adoption-bill-metro-weekly.php"},"modified":"2017-02-08T14:46:55","modified_gmt":"2017-02-08T19:46:55","slug":"south-dakota-considering-religious-freedom-adoption-bill-metro-weekly","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/freedom\/south-dakota-considering-religious-freedom-adoption-bill-metro-weekly.php","title":{"rendered":"South Dakota considering religious freedom adoption bill &#8211; Metro Weekly"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      South Dakota State Capitol  Photo: Jim Bowen, via Wikimedia.    <\/p>\n<p>    South Dakota lawmakers are weighing a proposed bill that would    allow agents of adoption and foster care agencies to reject    qualified parents based on personal religious or moral    objections.  <\/p>\n<p>    Under the bill, SB 149, child placement agencies are given    significant leeway to discriminate against prospective parents    based on a wide swath of beliefs. While an agency may not    discriminate based on race, ethnicity or national origin, it    can refuse to place children in homes based on the parents    religious beliefs (or lack of religion), moral beliefs, marital    status, sexual orientation, gender identity, or even an    adoptive or foster parents accepting attitude toward    homosexuality.  <\/p>\n<p>    The bill also hamstrings the state to be able to respond in any    retaliatory way against an agency that chooses to discriminate.    The agency cannot be denied state funding, tax breaks, or    special contracts, and the state cannot sue to force the agency    to stop discriminating. Child advocates are concerned that the    measure may result in a backlog of childrenunable to find    permanent homesby further limiting the number of    eligibleadoptive or foster parents.  <\/p>\n<p>    Similar bills have been passed in previous years in other    states, including Virginia, where lawmakers approved a conscience clause exemption bill that    allowed child placement agencies to discriminate based on a    host of characteristics. The bill was signed into law by former    Gov. Bob McDonnell (R) in 2012.  <\/p>\n<p>    South Dakota is poised to pass a sweeping discriminatory bill    that puts kids at risk, Eunice Rho, advocacy and policy    counsel for the American Civil Liberties Union, said in a    statement. Senate Bill 149 would allow any adoption or foster    care agency to reject qualified parents on religious grounds,    such as if they are LGBT, of a different faith, or because they    are divorced.  <\/p>\n<p>    This shameful bill resembles the draft of the anti-LGBT,    anti-choice executive order [from the White House] making its    rounds last week that prompted a public outcry. South Dakota    shoudl realize that the public will not accept this type of    discrimination, especially when vulnerable kids are at risk.  <\/p>\n<p>    SB 149 is scheduled to be heard by the Senate Health &    Human Services Committee on Wednesday, Feb. 15.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>More:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.metroweekly.com\/2017\/02\/south-dakota-considering-religious-freedom-adoption-bill\/\" title=\"South Dakota considering religious freedom adoption bill - Metro Weekly\">South Dakota considering religious freedom adoption bill - Metro Weekly<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> South Dakota State Capitol Photo: Jim Bowen, via Wikimedia. South Dakota lawmakers are weighing a proposed bill that would allow agents of adoption and foster care agencies to reject qualified parents based on personal religious or moral objections. Under the bill, SB 149, child placement agencies are given significant leeway to discriminate against prospective parents based on a wide swath of beliefs.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/freedom\/south-dakota-considering-religious-freedom-adoption-bill-metro-weekly.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-206050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206050"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=206050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/206050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=206050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=206050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=206050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}