April 10, 2015|4:46 pm <\/p>\n
Protesters against U.S. President Barack Obama's health care overhaul gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington, June 28, 2012. The Supreme Court is set to deliver on Thursday its ruling on President Barack Obama's 2010 healthcare overhaul, his signature domestic policy achievement, in a historic case that could hand him a huge triumph or a stinging rebuke just over four months before he seeks re-election. <\/p>\n
When Evangelicals are exposed to arguments defending their own free speech and religious freedom, they become more accepting of extending similar rights to their political foes, a new study found. <\/p>\n
\"Rights, Reflection, and Reciprocity: How Rights Talk Affects the Political Process,\" by political scientists Paul Djupe, Denison University; Andrew Lewis, University of Cincinnati; and Ted Jelen, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, will be presented this month at the Midwest Political Science Association's annual meeting in Chicago. <\/p>\n
The researchers sought to understand if the recent culture war battles between sexual freedom and religious freedom (see, for example, here, hereand here) would lead to greater or lesser division and intolerance among the combatants. (This paper focuses on the conservative side but they suggest they will also be studying the liberal side.) <\/p>\n
In an article for the political science blog The Monkey Cage, the authors explain that their research \"has identified a fascinating silver lining [to those culture war battles]. We find that evangelical Christians who are exposed to claims about religious rights actually become more willing to extend First Amendment rights to their ideological opponents. That is, the campaign to reinforce religious liberty might actually increase political tolerance in the long run.\" <\/p>\n
(Photo: The Christian Post\/Sonny Hong) <\/p>\n
Paul Djupe, associate professor of political science at Denison University, presenting \"The Choice That Matters: Politics in the Role of Leaving Congregations,\" at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., Aug. 30, 2014. <\/p>\n
The study used a survey experiment. A sample of 2,141 respondents, including 274 Evangelicals and 1,867 non-Evangelicals, were divided into groups exposed to different messages from hypothetical political candidates and clergy. These messages were about pro-life protestors, the Obama administration's birth control mandate, teaching creationism, and a photographer declining to work at a same-sex wedding. Each group had messages based upon either morality, free speech, religious liberty, and a less specific message that was used as the control group. The study also used a number of control measures that are common in studies of tolerance education, ideology, political interest, gender, age, and democratic norms. <\/p>\n
The respondents were also asked to identify which groups they either \"like the least\" or \"disagree with the most\" from among these options: immigrants, Tea Party members, Muslims, homosexuals, Christian fundamentalists, or atheists. For the full sample, the non-Evangelicals chose Christian fundamentalists as their least liked group, followed by the Tea Party. Evangelicals chose atheists as their least liked group, followed by Muslims and the Tea Party. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read this article: <\/p>\n
Religious Freedom Debates Make Evangelicals More Tolerant, Study Finds<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" April 10, 2015|4:46 pm Protesters against U.S. President Barack Obama's health care overhaul gather outside the Supreme Court in Washington, June 28, 2012. Continue reading