{"id":196925,"date":"2015-03-31T03:44:07","date_gmt":"2015-03-31T07:44:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/unpacking-indianas-religious-freedom-law.php"},"modified":"2015-03-31T03:44:07","modified_gmt":"2015-03-31T07:44:07","slug":"unpacking-indianas-religious-freedom-law","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/freedom\/unpacking-indianas-religious-freedom-law.php","title":{"rendered":"Unpacking Indianas Religious Freedom Law"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    After a firestorm of criticism aimed at a new religious-freedom    law,Indiana    legislative leaders are heading back to the drawing    boardto clarify the law so that it cant result in    discrimination, including denial of services to gays and    lesbians.  <\/p>\n<p>    Supporters of gay rights have denounced the law, which sets a    legal framework for people to challenge government laws that    hinder their practice of religion. Some have argued that the    law would allow businesses, like bakers and florists and others    that cater to weddings, to decline to work with gays and    lesbians.  <\/p>\n<p>    Does the     law as already passedmake it easier for businesses or    individuals to discriminate against gays and lesbians?  <\/p>\n<p>    Lets try to unpack this.  <\/p>\n<p>    I. The Federal Religious Freedom Restoration    Act  <\/p>\n<p>    The Indiana law and similar laws adopted by 19 states are    modeled on the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, a 1993    federal law introduced in the House by then Rep. Chuck Schumer    and signed by then-President Bill Clinton.  <\/p>\n<p>    The RFRA essentially said laws that substantially burden a    persons exercise of religion shall not stand, unless the    government can show that the burden is necessary in order to    further a compelling governmental interest and that achieving    that interest is done in the least restrictive way possible.    That legal standard is known as strict scrutiny.  <\/p>\n<p>    Legal experts say that the federal law was enacted in response    to a1990 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court    calledEmployment    Division v. Smith. The court upheldOregons refusal    to give unemployment benefits to two Native Americans fired    from their jobs at a rehab clinic after it was found they had    smoked peyote in a religious ceremony. In that case, the court    did not apply strict scrutiny.  <\/p>\n<p>    In other words, the original federal RFRA had little to do with    gays and lesbians. It has more with shoring up protections for    those less widely practiced religions whose unusual rituals,    like smoking peyote during ceremonies, might otherwise be    rendered illegal.  <\/p>\n<p>    II. State Religious Freedom Restoration Acts  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Follow this link: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/law\/2015\/03\/30\/unpacking-indianas-religious-freedom-law\/?mod=smallbusiness%2F\" title=\"Unpacking Indianas Religious Freedom Law\">Unpacking Indianas Religious Freedom Law<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> After a firestorm of criticism aimed at a new religious-freedom law,Indiana legislative leaders are heading back to the drawing boardto clarify the law so that it cant result in discrimination, including denial of services to gays and lesbians. Supporters of gay rights have denounced the law, which sets a legal framework for people to challenge government laws that hinder their practice of religion. Some have argued that the law would allow businesses, like bakers and florists and others that cater to weddings, to decline to work with gays and lesbians.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/freedom\/unpacking-indianas-religious-freedom-law.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-freedom"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196925"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}