{"id":196415,"date":"2015-03-28T20:03:55","date_gmt":"2015-03-29T00:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/attorney-seeks-new-trial-in-stop-and-frisk-case.php"},"modified":"2015-03-28T20:03:55","modified_gmt":"2015-03-29T00:03:55","slug":"attorney-seeks-new-trial-in-stop-and-frisk-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/fourth-amendment-2\/attorney-seeks-new-trial-in-stop-and-frisk-case.php","title":{"rendered":"Attorney seeks new trial in stop-and-frisk case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>JULIE SHAW, Daily News Staff Writer <a href=\"mailto:shawj@phillynews.com\">shawj@phillynews.com<\/a>,      215-854-2592                    Posted: Sunday, March 29, 2015, 3:01 AM                      <\/p>\n<p>      AN ATTORNEY for a man who sued two cops over a 2013      stop-and-frisk filed a motion in federal court yesterday      seeking a new trial based in part on jurors' confusion over      the verdict sheet.    <\/p>\n<p>      Paul Messing, attorney for plaintiff Herbert Spellman, 51,      contended in a memorandum that U.S. District Judge Stewart      Dalzell had a duty to explain to the jury that its verdict      sheet \"contained contradictory responses, and to further      instruct or provide guidance to the jury on its options.\" By      not doing so \"was error,\" he wrote.    <\/p>\n<p>      Messing also attached a signed \"declaration\" by one juror,      which said all seven jurors unanimously agreed that the two      cops, David O'Connor, 31, and Brad Momme, 29, who stopped and      frisked Spellman, violated his rights.    <\/p>\n<p>      The Daily News found a phone number yesterday for      that juror, a Chester County man, 63, in a public database      and called him.    <\/p>\n<p>    The man, who asked that his name not be published, told the    Daily News: \"The verdict that we recorded wasn't the    verdict that the jury intended. So the will of the jury was not    held forth.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The jury, on its March 18 verdict sheet, answered \"No\" to    questions asking if the officers seized, searched and detained    Spellman \"in violation of the Fourth Amendment causing harm\" to    him and if the cops \"used unreasonable force\" against Spellman    \"in violation of the Fourth Amendment causing harm\" to him.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Chester County juror said the \"causing harm\" part of the    questions \"was what threw us.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    The jury did not think there was sufficient evidence showing    the cops caused Spellman any physical injuries, the juror said.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"But, we did think there was sufficient evidence [that the    cops] didn't have just cause to stop Spellman,\" he said.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philly.com\/philly\/news\/20150329_Attorney_seeks_new_trial_in_stop-and-frisk_case.html\/RK=0\/RS=y5otNYAV7fiJGeqojWsn3IQkhAE-\" title=\"Attorney seeks new trial in stop-and-frisk case\">Attorney seeks new trial in stop-and-frisk case<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> JULIE SHAW, Daily News Staff Writer <a href=\"mailto:shawj@phillynews.com\">shawj@phillynews.com<\/a>, 215-854-2592 Posted: Sunday, March 29, 2015, 3:01 AM AN ATTORNEY for a man who sued two cops over a 2013 stop-and-frisk filed a motion in federal court yesterday seeking a new trial based in part on jurors' confusion over the verdict sheet.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/fourth-amendment-2\/attorney-seeks-new-trial-in-stop-and-frisk-case.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261461],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-196415","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fourth-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196415"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=196415"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/196415\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196415"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=196415"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=196415"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}