A preview by our editor in chief of the April issue of Scientific American <\/p>\n
Mariette DiChristina <\/p>\n
We're used to thinking of black holes as places where gravity is so strong not even light can escapewhere an unnoticed crossing by a hapless astronaut over an unseen and un-felt event horizon nonetheless means a point of no return. According to Einstein's general theory of relativity, no signposts would mark the spot where the chance of escape dropped to zero, writes physicist Joseph Polchinski. <\/p>\n
But in this issue's cover story, Burning Rings of Fire, Polchinski paints a new picture, courtesy of his and others' work in a discipline that Albert Einstein found vexing: quantum mechanics. Replacing the unknowable border to an eternity of darkness is a stormy firewall of instantly lethal high-energy particles. If quantum mechanics is to be trusted, firewalls are the consequence, Polchinski notes. The controversial finding arose from scientists' attempts to resolve apparent contradictions of physics that occur in extreme environments, a challenge highlighted by Stephen Hawking, among others. <\/p>\n
Nanotechnology can be equally invisible to the eye but promises far more benignin fact, salutaryencounters. In our special report on the Future of Medicine, we examine what benefits nanomedicine is bringing us already and how those will take shape in the future. We can look forward to improvements in cancer-fighting therapies, diagnostics, wound healing, delivery of drugs with nanomotors, and more. <\/p>\n
A different class of unseen actors is at work in the worrying trend of cyberattacks. Software vulnerabilities have led to hacked networks, servers, personal computers and online accountswith theft of information from millions. Your own PC or corporate network can become enslaved to further the ends of cybercriminals. <\/p>\n
How to Survive Cyberwar, by Keren Elazari, takes an unsettling look at the growing problem. Taking a military point of view, Elazari argues, will ultimately not be the most successful approachindeed, it might just make things worse. Instead she suggests thinking of it as a public health issue. Government agencies are key players, but they cannot stop the spread of [cyber]diseases on their own. Success will mean that all of us play important roles. Read on to see how we can, as cybercitizens, do the equivalent of washing our hands and getting our vaccines. <\/p>\n
This article was originally published with the title \"Dark and Stormy.\" <\/p>\n
Already have an account? Sign In <\/p>\n
Digital Issue $5.99 <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
See more here:<\/p>\n
Black Holes, Nanotechnology and Cyber Attacks Come to the Fore<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A preview by our editor in chief of the April issue of Scientific American Mariette DiChristina We're used to thinking of black holes as places where gravity is so strong not even light can escapewhere an unnoticed crossing by a hapless astronaut over an unseen and un-felt event horizon nonetheless means a point of no return. According to Einstein's general theory of relativity, no signposts would mark the spot where the chance of escape dropped to zero, writes physicist Joseph Polchinski. Continue reading