{"id":187610,"date":"2015-03-04T12:46:25","date_gmt":"2015-03-04T17:46:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/justices-sharply-divided-over-health-care-law-subsidies.php"},"modified":"2015-03-04T12:46:25","modified_gmt":"2015-03-04T17:46:25","slug":"justices-sharply-divided-over-health-care-law-subsidies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/justices-sharply-divided-over-health-care-law-subsidies.php","title":{"rendered":"Justices sharply divided over health care law subsidies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>      WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court was sharply divided      Wednesday in the latest challenge to President Barack Obama's      health overhaul, this time over the tax subsidies that make      insurance affordable for millions of Americans.    <\/p>\n<p>      The justices aggressively questioned lawyers on both sides of      what Justice Elena Kagan called \"this never-ending saga,\" the      latest politically charged fight over the Affordable Care      Act.    <\/p>\n<p>      Chief Justice John Roberts said almost nothing in nearly 90      minutes of back-and-forth, and Justice Anthony Kennedy's      questions did not make clear how he will come out. Roberts      was the decisive vote to uphold the law in 2012.    <\/p>\n<p>      Otherwise, the same liberal-conservative divide that      characterized the earlier case was evident.    <\/p>\n<p>    Opponents of the law say that only residents of states that set    up their own insurance markets can get federal subsidies to    help pay their premiums. The administration says the law    provides for subsidies in all 50 states.  <\/p>\n<p>    The liberal justices peppered lawyer Michael Carvin almost from    the outset of his argument to limit the subsidies.  <\/p>\n<p>    Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the law set up flexibility for    states to either set up their own markets or rely on the    federal healthcare.gov. Giving subsidies only to people in some    states would be \"disastrous,\" Ginsburg said.  <\/p>\n<p>    When Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. stepped to the    lectern, the liberal justices fell silent, and Justices Samuel    Alito and Antonin Scalia took over.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It may not be the statute Congress intended, but it may be the    statute Congress wrote,\" Scalia said of the provision in    question. The case focuses on four words in the law,    \"established by the state.\" The challengers say those words are    clear and conclusive evidence that Congress wanted to limit    subsidies to those consumers who get their insurance through a    marketplace, or exchange, that was established by a state.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.philly.com\/philly\/news\/politics\/20150304_ap_c29555a9a41a4121ac2f13834aaf6e58.html\/RK=0\/RS=mWdU83eLKlbkp1vGRHwEy1UE5lY-\" title=\"Justices sharply divided over health care law subsidies\">Justices sharply divided over health care law subsidies<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court was sharply divided Wednesday in the latest challenge to President Barack Obama's health overhaul, this time over the tax subsidies that make insurance affordable for millions of Americans. The justices aggressively questioned lawyers on both sides of what Justice Elena Kagan called \"this never-ending saga,\" the latest politically charged fight over the Affordable Care Act. Chief Justice John Roberts said almost nothing in nearly 90 minutes of back-and-forth, and Justice Anthony Kennedy's questions did not make clear how he will come out <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/health-care\/justices-sharply-divided-over-health-care-law-subsidies.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-187610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-health-care"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187610"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=187610"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/187610\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=187610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=187610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=187610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}