{"id":186737,"date":"2015-02-27T05:47:45","date_gmt":"2015-02-27T10:47:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/volokh-conspiracy-some-important-new-books-on-libertarianism.php"},"modified":"2015-02-27T05:47:45","modified_gmt":"2015-02-27T10:47:45","slug":"volokh-conspiracy-some-important-new-books-on-libertarianism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/libertarian\/volokh-conspiracy-some-important-new-books-on-libertarianism.php","title":{"rendered":"Volokh Conspiracy: Some important new books on libertarianism"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A number of new books on libertarianism and related issues have    come out recently or should be in print soon. If you are    interested in libertarianism, these books may well be of    interest to you.  <\/p>\n<p>    I. David Boazs The Libertarian Mind.  <\/p>\n<p>    Perhaps the one with the broadest appeal is     The Libertarian Mind, by David Boaz of the Cato    Institute. It is the best recent introduction to libertarianism    for a popular audience. Boaz does an excellent job of surveying    both the history of libertarianism and libertarian positions on    a variety of modern political issues. He is especially good on    noneconomic issues that many people with only a passing    knowledge of libertarian thought dont normally associate with    the movement. For example, he emphasizes that libertarian    thinkers were calling for the abolition of anti-sodomy laws,    the War on Drugs, and other pernicious social regulations    long before these became mainstream positions elsewhere on the    political spectrum. In the nineteenth century and early    twentieth centuries, they were among the first to advocate the    abolition of slavery and laws banning married women from owning    property and women in general from entering into various    professions. Boaz also does a good job of raising and    addressing a variety of standard objections to libertarian    ideas that are traditional advanced by critics (particularly    mainstream liberals and conservatives in the United States).    For example, one chapter has a strong discussion of how civil    society efforts are much more successful at caring for the poor    than advocates of large welfare states generally assume.  <\/p>\n<p>    In part because of the books broad scope, there are places    where it glosses over important issues. For example, Boaz only    briefly mentions     the problem of political ignorance, which in my view is a    much more central element of the case for limiting the power of    democratic governments than his analysis suggests. The book    also includes very little discussion of internal disagreements    among libertarians, such as that between utilitarians    libertarians and advocates of natural rights, the longstanding    debate between majority who advocate tightly limited government    and the minority who advocate anarchism. Similarly, Boaz    assumes with relatively little argument that a highly dovish    foreign policy is the right approach for libertarians; that is    indeed the dominant view among American libertarians today, but    it is far from the    only one, either today    or historically.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite a few limitations like these, this is an extremely    valuable contribution to the public debate. As an introduction    to libertarian ideas, I think it can be usefully paired with    British political scientist Mark Penningtons     2011 book Robust Political Economy, which outlines    the libertarian take on several major public policy issues in    greater social scientific depth, and also devotes more    attention to countries outside the United States.  <\/p>\n<p>    II. Jacob Levy, Rationalism, Pluralism, and    Freedom.  <\/p>\n<p>    McGill political theorist Jacob Levys     Rationalism, Pluralism, and Freedom is a great    overview of a longstanding issue in libertarian thought (and    liberal thought more generally): the appropriate role of    intermediate groups such as religious organizations,    voluntary associations, and organized ethnic groups. While such    groups can enhance individual liberty, they can also undermine    it. As Levy shows, for centuries liberal thinkers have been    divided between those who claimed that intermediate groups    should have wide autonomy to organize themselves as they see    fit, and those who argue that the state must tightly regulate    them, lest they become a threat to individual freedom. We see    this today, for example, in debates between those who argue    that traditional religious groups should have wide autonomy,    and those who fear that extending such autonomy to ,e.g.,    fundamentalist Muslims and Christians, would lead to    subordination of women and other injustices. Levy effectively    traces this longstanding debate back to the origins of liberal    thought in the early through the Enlightenment, the American    and French Revolutions, nineteenth century thinkers like de    Tocqueville and Mill, and on to the present day.  <\/p>\n<p>    Levys normative chapters are a bit less strong than the    historical ones. He argues that neither pure freedom of    association nor complete homogenization of groups to eliminate    illiberal tendencies is defensible. Thus, he concludes that the    tension between group pluralism and the possible need for    centralized control of these groups in order to protect    individuals cant be completely eradicated. This is true as far    as it goes; like Levy,     I am skeptical that any rights  should be absolutely    inviolable, regardless of circumstances. But I think he    tends to underrate the case for strong (even if not completely    unlimited) freedom of association and the ways in which    competition between groups can give individuals a wide range of    options and mitigate abuses, even without extensive government    intervention. Be that as it may, this book is a must-read for    both libertarians and others interested in debates over freedom    of association.  <\/p>\n<p>        III. Brennan and Jaworskis Markets Without    Limits.  <\/p>\n<p>    Finally, I very much look forward to Jason Brennan and Peter    Jaworskis book Markets    Without Limits. Despite the title, the authors dont    claim that markets should be literally without limits, in the    sense that any and all possible commercial transactions are    morally defensible. Rather,     as the authors put it, they argue that [i]f you may do it    for free, you may do it for money. For example, if it is    permissible to donate organs, it should also be permissible to        sell them in organ markets. On the other hand, it is wrong    for a hit man to commit murder for profit, because committing    murder is wrong regardless of whether he gets paid for it or    not.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>View post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.washingtonpost.com\/c\/34656\/f\/636635\/s\/43d3a2cb\/sc\/38\/l\/0L0Swashingtonpost0N0Cnews0Cvolokh0Econspiracy0Cwp0C20A150C0A20C260Csome0Eimportant0Enew0Ebooks0Eon0Elibertarianism0C0Dwprss0Frss0Inational\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=c7lujfiqlOyXMofIdX63kOkp7Z0-\" title=\"Volokh Conspiracy: Some important new books on libertarianism\">Volokh Conspiracy: Some important new books on libertarianism<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A number of new books on libertarianism and related issues have come out recently or should be in print soon. If you are interested in libertarianism, these books may well be of interest to you.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/libertarian\/volokh-conspiracy-some-important-new-books-on-libertarianism.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-186737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-libertarian"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186737"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=186737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/186737\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=186737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=186737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=186737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}