Computers are better than us at chess, Jeopardy and now plenty of Atari games, following Googles breakthrough in artificial intelligence. But there are still a few games were Googles impressive new algorithm is largely clueless. Of the 49 games it attempted, here are the five it struggled with the most: <\/p>\n
5. Asteroids (1979): Googles professional human game testers did 93 percent better than the algorithm. <\/p>\n
4. Frostbite (1983): To win this game you jump on ice blocks to help build igloos, which the algorithm couldnt master. The human testers did 94 percent better than Googles algorithm. <\/p>\n
3.Gravitar (1982):Human testers were 95 percent better.<\/p>\n
2. Private eye (1983): Googles humans were 98 percent better at this than the algorithm. <\/p>\n
1. Montezumas Revenge (1984): Googles algorithm couldnt even score a single point, making the game its very worst performance of 49 games it tried. <\/p>\n
Related: 22 Atari games where humans are no match for Googles algorithm <\/p>\n
Googles breakthrough in artificial intelligence, and what it means for self-driving cars <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original post:<\/p>\n
Innovations: 5 classic Atari games that totally stump Googles artificial intelligence algorithm<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Computers are better than us at chess, Jeopardy and now plenty of Atari games, following Googles breakthrough in artificial intelligence. But there are still a few games were Googles impressive new algorithm is largely clueless. Continue reading