This article is about a critique of humanism. For the futurist ideology and movement, see transhumanism. <\/p>\n
Posthumanism or post-humanism (meaning \"after humanism\" or \"beyond humanism\") is a term with five definitions:[1] <\/p>\n
Ihab Hassan, theorist in the academic study of literature, once stated: <\/p>\n
Humanism may be coming to an end as humanism transforms itself into something one must helplessly call posthumanism.[7] <\/p>\n
This view predates the currents of posthumanism which have developed over the late 20th century in somewhat diverse, but complementary, domains of thought and practice. For example, Hassan is a known scholar whose theoretical writings expressly address postmodernity in society.[citation needed] Theorists who both complement and contrast Hassan include Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Bruno Latour, N. Katherine Hayles, Peter Sloterdijk, Stefan Lorenz Sorgner, Evan Thompson, Francisco Varela and Douglas Kellner. Among the theorists are philosophers, such as Robert Pepperell, who have written about a \"posthuman condition\", which is often substituted for the term \"posthumanism\".[3][5] <\/p>\n
Posthumanism mainly differentiates from classical humanism in that it restores the stature that had been made of humanity to one of many natural species. According to this claim, humans have no inherent rights to destroy nature or set themselves above it in ethical considerations a priori. Human knowledge is also reduced to a less controlling position, previously seen as the defining aspect of the world. The limitations and fallibility of human intelligence are confessed, even though it does not imply abandoning the rational tradition of humanism.[citation needed] <\/p>\n
Posthumanism is sometimes used as a synonym for an ideology of technology known as \"transhumanism\" because it affirms the possibility and desirability of achieving a \"posthuman future\", albeit in purely evolutionary terms. However, posthumanists in the humanities and the arts are critical of transhumanism, in part, because they argue that it incorporates and extends many of the values of Enlightenment humanism and classical liberalism, namely scientism, according to performance philosopher Shannon Bell:[8] <\/p>\n
Altruism, mutualism, humanism are the soft and slimy virtues that underpin liberal capitalism. Humanism has always been integrated into discourses of exploitation: colonialism, imperialism, neoimperialism, democracy, and of course, American democratization. One of the serious flaws in Transhumanism is the importation of liberal-human values to the biotechno enhancement of the human. Posthumanism has a much stronger critical edge attempting to develop through enactment new understandings of the self and other, essence, consciousness, intelligence, reason, agency, intimacy, life, embodiment, identity and the body.[8] <\/p>\n
Some critics have argued that all forms of posthumanism have more in common than their respective proponents realize.[9] <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Originally posted here: <\/p>\n
Posthumanism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" This article is about a critique of humanism. For the futurist ideology and movement, see transhumanism Continue reading