{"id":181518,"date":"2015-02-07T11:11:26","date_gmt":"2015-02-07T16:11:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/fifth-amendment-of-the-constitution-of-ireland-wikipedia.php"},"modified":"2015-02-07T11:11:26","modified_gmt":"2015-02-07T16:11:26","slug":"fifth-amendment-of-the-constitution-of-ireland-wikipedia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/fifth-amendment\/fifth-amendment-of-the-constitution-of-ireland-wikipedia.php","title":{"rendered":"Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland &#8211; Wikipedia &#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland removed    from the constitution a controversial reference to the \"special    position\" of the Roman Catholic    Church as well as recognition of certain other named    religious denominations. It was effected by the Fifth    Amendment of the Constitution Act, 1972 which was approved    by referendum    on 7 December 1972 and signed into law on 5 January 1973.  <\/p>\n<p>    In drafting the Irish constitution in 1936 and 1937, amon de    Valera and his advisers chose to reflect what had been a    contemporary willingness by constitution drafters and lawmakers    in Europe to mention and in some ways recognise religion in    explicit detail. This contrasted with many 1920s constitutions,    notably the Irish    Free State Constitution of 1922, which, following the    secularism of the initial period following the First World War, simply prohibited any    discrimination based on religion or avoided religious issues    entirely.  <\/p>\n<p>    De Valera, his advisers (Fr. John    Charles McQuaid, the future Archbishop of Dublin), and the    men who put words to de Valera's concepts for the constitution    (John Hearne and Mchel  Grobhtha) faced conflicting demands    in his drafting of the article on religion.  <\/p>\n<p>    De Valera's solution was Article 44. In contemporary terms, it    marked a defeat for conservative Catholics, and Pope Pius XI    explicitly withheld his approval from it:  <\/p>\n<p>    Though perceived in retrospect as a sectarian article, Article    44 was praised in 1937 by leaders of Irish Protestant churches    (notably the Church of Ireland Archbishop of    Dublin) and by Jewish groups. Conservative Catholics    condemned it as \"liberal\".  <\/p>\n<p>    When the contents of Article 44 were put to Pope Pius XI by    Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli (then    Cardinal Secretary of State,    later Pope    Pius XII), the pope stated in diplomatic language: \"We do    not approve, nor do we not disapprove  we will remain    silent\".[citation    needed] It was said that the Vatican was    privately more appreciative of the constitution, and Pius XII    later praised it.[1]  <\/p>\n<p>    By 1972 an article once condemned by critics as liberal and    indeed by some as offensive to Catholicism, had come to be seen    as out of place, dated, and potentially discriminatory to    Protestants. The \"special position\" of the    Catholic Church had granted to that church, albeit in an    undefined manner, was a special status that was out of step    with post-Vatican II Catholic thinking on    the relationships between the churches. The Protestant    churches, though they had declined in adherents, were more    outspoken and willing to express their unhappiness than they    had been in the Ireland of the 1920s and 1930s, when many were    fearful that criticism of the Irish state would be seen as    criticism of Irish independence and so implicitly a preference    for the British regime that had ruled Ireland before 1922.  <\/p>\n<p>    In addition, in the rapprochement between Northern    Ireland and what was by then known as the Republic of    Ireland, many southerners perceived the \"special position\" as a    barrier between a north-south relationship and even a potential    source of discrimination against minorities. In addition the    explicit recognition of certain denominations was seen as    unnecessary because of the provisions Article 44.2, which    contains guarantees of freedom of worship and against religious    discrimination. Though the changes shown above are those made    to the English-language version of the constitution,    constitutionally it is the Irish text that takes precedence.  <\/p>\n<p>    This Fifth Amendment was introduced by the Fianna Fil    government of Jack Lynch and supported by every other major    political party. The Catholic Church did not voice any    objection to the amendment, but it was opposed by some    conservative Catholics. Some leading members of the Church of    Ireland and the Jewish Community said during the campaign that    while they appreciated the Article's recognition of their    existence (and in the case of the Jewish Community, their right    to exist, in contrast to anti-Jewish laws in other states) in    1937, it was no longer needed in the 1970s and had lost its    usefulness.  <\/p>\n<p>    The referendum on the amendment occurred on the same day as the    referendum on the Fourth    Amendment which lowered the voting age to eighteen. The    Fifth Amendment was approved by 721,003 (84.4%) in favour and    133,430 (15.6%) against.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Fifth_Amendment_of_the_Constitution_of_Ireland\" title=\"Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland - Wikipedia ...\">Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland - Wikipedia ...<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of Ireland removed from the constitution a controversial reference to the \"special position\" of the Roman Catholic Church as well as recognition of certain other named religious denominations. It was effected by the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 1972 which was approved by referendum on 7 December 1972 and signed into law on 5 January 1973 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/fifth-amendment\/fifth-amendment-of-the-constitution-of-ireland-wikipedia.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261462],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-181518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-fifth-amendment"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181518"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=181518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/181518\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=181518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=181518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=181518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}