{"id":178897,"date":"2015-01-30T10:49:02","date_gmt":"2015-01-30T15:49:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/genetic-screening-for-workers-a-panacea-or-a-pandoras-box.php"},"modified":"2015-01-30T10:49:02","modified_gmt":"2015-01-30T15:49:02","slug":"genetic-screening-for-workers-a-panacea-or-a-pandoras-box","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/genetic-screening-for-workers-a-panacea-or-a-pandoras-box.php","title":{"rendered":"Genetic screening for workers: A panacea or a pandora&#39;s box?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    To retain and attract top talent, a quarter of UK businesses    would extend health screening into genetic testing  but fear    of legal repercussions is an inhibiting factor for 76% of    employers  <\/p>\n<p>    With the price of full DNA testing plummeting, and in    anticipation of personalised medicines fine-tuned to a    patient's genetic make-up, one in four (24%) UK businesses say    that they are likely to extend health screening into genetic    testing as they strive to retain and attract top talent, a new    survey has found.  <\/p>\n<p>    UK businesses could soon offer employees a complete readout of    their genetic blueprint, and hence unprecedented insight into    their current and future health, but, amidst all the    excitement, Baroness Helena Kennedy, QC, Vice President of the    Patients Association and former Chair of the Human Genetics    Committee, urges businesses to consider the wider implications,    suggesting that genetic screening of employees may be more of a    Pandoras box than a panacea.  <\/p>\n<p>    More than 600 UK business leaders were questioned for the    Astellas Innovation DebateTM 2015, which on Thursday 29th    January brings together a panel of world-renowned experts at    The Royal Institution of Great Britain     to discuss the implications of the revolutions in DNA and    data for our health.1  <\/p>\n<p>    Currently, one in four (24%) business leaders say they would    offer full genetic screening to their employees though this    rises to nearly a third (29%) in the IT and banking sectors,    where talent often seems in short supply. But most    employers (76%) the fear of legal repercussions is an    inhibiting factor.  <\/p>\n<p>    Of employers who said that their business would be unlikely to    offer genetic screening to employees, 43% said they might    reconsider their view in the future if better legislation were    introduced to protect the rights of employers (19%) and    employees (24%). 16% said they would re-consider their    view if the results of genetic testing could serve to reduce    the cost of key person insurance, while a further 16% said that    businesses would need access to advice on dealing with    employees found to be at higher genetic risk of developing    serious illness. Only 5% said they might choose to offer    genetic screening if their business could access genetic data    from test results.  <\/p>\n<p>    European legislation prohibits businesses from gaining access    to their employees genetic data, and most businesses (72%)    support this principle. Despite that, one in five bosses    (22%) admitted that an employee who revealed his\/her greater    genetic risk of serious illness would consequently also run a    greater risk of redundancy and become less eligible for    promotion.  <\/p>\n<p>    Baroness Helena Kennedy, QC, a panellist at the Astellas    Innovation Debate Vice President of the Patients Association,    and former Chair of the Human Genetics Commission, where she    successfully pushed for a moratorium on access to genetic    records for insurance companies and persuaded the Government to    make it a criminal offence to test DNA without an individuals    consent, commented:  <\/p>\n<p>    Of course its a testament to mankinds ingenuity that    genetics and technology are combining to bring the prospect of    personalised medicine much closer. But knowing the facts about    our genes can also bring challenges. For example, our genetic    information could be misused by insurers, who could    over-interpret the information in our genes, wrongly suspect we    are susceptible to some disease, and so not provide us with the    kind of insurance we need. Similarly, if an employee    shared some genetic information with his or her boss that    indicated a higher risk of, say, cancer or a neurological    disease, as this survey shows  the employee would be at    higher risk of discrimination in the workplace in the form of    redundancy or being passed over for promotion. This in    turn leaves the employer vulnerable to accusations of    discrimination. And then, on a personal level, employees might    well need professional support if they become distressed at the    prospect of a disease that they might or might not develop.  <\/p>\n<p>    Some US technology companies are offering employees DNA    screening to identify the risk of cancers, and holding out the    promise of personalised treatment based on their genetic    make-up should they need it. However, I would urge UK    businesses not to follow suit  certainly not without thinking    very carefully about the wider implications to them and their    employees. It is not just a matter of potential    discrimination and lawsuits, but also of the health benefits to    those being tested. Of course, we all recognise the    importance of screening people with a family history of certain    diseases and rare genetic disorders  as the 100,000 Genomes    Project is currently doing  but there is little benefit to    widespread genetic testing if it cant tell you when  or even    if  you will develop the disease.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.onrec.com\/news\/news-archive\/genetic-screening-for-workers-a-panacea-or-a-pandoras-box\/RK=0\/RS=9IFU.TJ3UQm2mJyj33Rc0rl5qr4-\" title=\"Genetic screening for workers: A panacea or a pandora&#39;s box?\">Genetic screening for workers: A panacea or a pandora&#39;s box?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> To retain and attract top talent, a quarter of UK businesses would extend health screening into genetic testing but fear of legal repercussions is an inhibiting factor for 76% of employers With the price of full DNA testing plummeting, and in anticipation of personalised medicines fine-tuned to a patient's genetic make-up, one in four (24%) UK businesses say that they are likely to extend health screening into genetic testing as they strive to retain and attract top talent, a new survey has found. UK businesses could soon offer employees a complete readout of their genetic blueprint, and hence unprecedented insight into their current and future health, but, amidst all the excitement, Baroness Helena Kennedy, QC, Vice President of the Patients Association and former Chair of the Human Genetics Committee, urges businesses to consider the wider implications, suggesting that genetic screening of employees may be more of a Pandoras box than a panacea. More than 600 UK business leaders were questioned for the Astellas Innovation DebateTM 2015, which on Thursday 29th January brings together a panel of world-renowned experts at The Royal Institution of Great Britain to discuss the implications of the revolutions in DNA and data for our health.1 Currently, one in four (24%) business leaders say they would offer full genetic screening to their employees though this rises to nearly a third (29%) in the IT and banking sectors, where talent often seems in short supply.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/genetic-screening-for-workers-a-panacea-or-a-pandoras-box.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-178897","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-engineering"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178897"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=178897"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/178897\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=178897"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=178897"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=178897"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}