{"id":174731,"date":"2015-01-16T04:42:51","date_gmt":"2015-01-16T09:42:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/artificial-intelligence-helps-predict-dangerous-solar-flares.php"},"modified":"2015-01-16T04:42:51","modified_gmt":"2015-01-16T09:42:51","slug":"artificial-intelligence-helps-predict-dangerous-solar-flares","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/artificial-intelligence\/artificial-intelligence-helps-predict-dangerous-solar-flares.php","title":{"rendered":"Artificial Intelligence Helps Predict Dangerous Solar Flares"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Though scientists do not    completely understand what triggers solar flares, Stanford    solar physicists Monica Bobra and Sebastien Couvidat have    automated the analysis of those gigantic explosions. The method    could someday provide advance warning to protect power grids    and communication satellites.Solar flares can release the energy    equivalent of many atomic bombs, enough to cut out satellite    communications and damage power grids on Earth, 93 million    miles away. The flares arise from twisted magnetic fields that    occur all over the sun's surface, and they increase in    frequency every 11 years, a cycle that is now at its    maximum.Using artificial intelligence techniques,    Stanford solar physicists Monica Bobra and Sebastien Couvidat    have automated the analysis of the largest ever set of solar    observations to forecast solar flares using data from the Solar    Dynamics Observatory (SDO), which takes more data than any    other satellite in NASA history. Their study identifies which    features are most useful for predicting solar    flares.Specifically, their study required analyzing    vector magnetic field data. Historically, instruments measured    the line-of-sight component of the solar magnetic field, an    approach that showed only the amplitude of the field. Later,    instruments showed the strength and direction of the fields,    called vector magnetic fields, but for only a small part of the    sun, or part of the time. Now an instrument on a    satellite-based system, the Helioseismic Magnetic Imager (HMI)    aboard SDO, collects vector magnetic fields and other    observations of the entire sun almost    continuously.Adding machine learningThe Stanford Solar Observatories Group,    headed by physics Professor Phil Scherrer, processes and stores    the SDO data, which takes 1.5 terabytes of data a day. During a    recent afternoon tea break, the group members chatted about    what they might do with all that data and talked about trying    something different.They recognized the difficulty of forming    predictions from many data points when using pure theory and    they had heard of the popularity of the online class on machine    learning taught by Andrew Ng, a Stanford professor of computer    science.\"Machine learning is a sophisticated way to    analyze a ton of data and classify it into different groups,\"    Bobra said.Machine learning software ascribes    information to a set of established categories. The software    looks for patterns and tries to see which information is    relevant for predicting a particular    category.For example, one could use machine-learning    software to predict whether or not people are fast swimmers.    First, the software looks at features of swimmers -- their    heights, weights, dietary habits, sleeping habits, their dogs'    names and their dates of birth.And then, through a guess and check    strategy, the software would try to identify which information    is useful in predicting whether or not a swimmer is    particularly speedy. It could look at a swimmer's height and    guess whether that particular height lies within the height    range of speedy swimmers, yes or no. If it guessed correctly,    it would \"learn\" that the height might be a good predictor of    speed.The software might find that a swimmer's    sleeping habits are good predictors of speed, whereas the name    of the swimmer's dog is not.The predictions would not be very accurate    after analysis of just the first few swimmers. The more    information provided, the better machine learning gets at    predicting.Similarly, the researchers wanted to know    how successfully machine learning would predict the strength of    solar flares from information about    sunspots.\"We    had never worked with the machine learning algorithm before,    but after we took the course we thought it would be a good idea    to apply it to solar flare forecasting,\" Couvidat said. He    applied the algorithms and Bobra characterized the features of    the two strongest classes of solar flares, M and X. Though    others have used machine learning algorithms to predict solar    flares, nobody has done it with such a large set of data and or    with vector magnetic field observations.M-class flares can cause minor radiation    storms that might endanger astronauts and cause brief radio    blackouts at Earth's poles. X-class flares are the most    powerful.Better flare predictionThe researchers catalogued flaring and    non-flaring regions from a database of more than 2,000 active    regions and then characterized those regions by 25 features    such as energy, current and field gradient. They then fed the    learning machine 70 percent of the data, to train it to    identify relevant features. And then they used the machine to    analyze the remaining 30 percent of the data to test its    accuracy in predicting solar flares.<\/p>\n<p>    Machine learning confirmed that    the topology of the magnetic field and the energy stored in the    magnetic field are very relevant to predicting solar flares.    Using just a few of the 25 features, machine learning    discriminated between active regions that would flare and those    that would not flare. Although others have used different    methods to come up with similar results, machine learning    provides a significant improvement because automated analysis    is faster and could provide earlier warnings of solar    flares.However, this study only used information    from the solar surface. That would be like trying to predict    Earth's weather from only surface measurements like    temperature, without considering the wind and cloud cover. The    next step in solar flare prediction would be to incorporate    data from the sun's atmosphere, Bobra said.Doing so would allow Bobra to pursue her    passion for solar physics. \"It's exciting because we not only    have a ton of data, but the images are just so beautiful,\" she    said. \"And it's truly universal. Creatures from a different    galaxy could be learning these same    principles.\"Monica Bobra and Sebastien Couvidat worked    under the direction of physicist Phil Scherrer of the WW Hansen    Experimental Physics Laboratory at Stanford.  <\/p>\n<p>    Please follow SpaceRef on Twitter and Like us on    Facebook.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original post: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/spaceref.com\/news\/viewpr.html?pid=44829\/RK=0\/RS=Cu37834OL8aHSjJR5DCiLJF5qig-\" title=\"Artificial Intelligence Helps Predict Dangerous Solar Flares\">Artificial Intelligence Helps Predict Dangerous Solar Flares<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Though scientists do not completely understand what triggers solar flares, Stanford solar physicists Monica Bobra and Sebastien Couvidat have automated the analysis of those gigantic explosions. The method could someday provide advance warning to protect power grids and communication satellites.Solar flares can release the energy equivalent of many atomic bombs, enough to cut out satellite communications and damage power grids on Earth, 93 million miles away <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/artificial-intelligence\/artificial-intelligence-helps-predict-dangerous-solar-flares.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174731","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-artificial-intelligence"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174731"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174731"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174731\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174731"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174731"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174731"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}