\"We have the right to make dumb jokes.\" <\/p>\n
-- Tina Fey <\/p>\n
I'm a free speech advocate. I've been arrested and I have served jail time for exercising my First Amendment rights. As a reporter, magazine editor and political cartoonist, I've received complaints (and a few rare death threats) for my work. So it goes without saying that I share the global outrage over the brutal murders of the cartoonists and staff at the French magazine Charlie Hebdo. It chills the blood to imagine any American cartoonist being placed in the crosshairs of a Kalashnikov. No matter your race, religion, history or lifestyle, murder is a heinous crimefar worse than even the most wounding insult. <\/p>\n
But after dwelling on the causes and effects of this tragedy, I find that I have some qualms about the argument that there should be no limits to the exercise of free speech. <\/p>\n
My concerns begin with a question: \"At what point does satire become bullying?\" At what point does satire morph from a deftly wielded surgical tool into a blunt instrument of personal or cultural assault? As we have seen, a pen can draw a cartoon but a weaponized cartoon can draw blood. Does the cause of \"free speech\" bind us to defend slanders, lies and defamation? <\/p>\n
Many advocates of free speech make a point of defending uncensored and fearless public expressionbut only so long as the speech does not veer into venomous and hateful rhetoric. When \"free speech\" devolves into racist or misogynistic invective, it can prove as devastating to public peace as yelling \"Fire!\" in the legendary \"crowded auditorium.\" Such mean-spirited expressions are classified as \"hate speech\" and are characterized by content that \"offends, threatens, or insults groups, based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits.\" <\/p>\n
Unclothed Emperors Versus the Naked Masses <\/p>\n
Satire, as a form of mockery, reads entirely differently depending on where and how it is directed. Ridicule directed against the powerfulwhether the target be a wealthy member of the elite or a multinational corporationis most easily recognized as the proper use of the satiric tool. However, ridicule directed against the powerless, the disenfranchised, or the disabled can be seen as inappropriate and coldhearted bullying. <\/p>\n
Even hate speech can be nuanced by the interplay of social realities. It's one thing for the oppressed to call for the elimination of the ruling classes; it's another matter for the rulers to call for the elimination of masses. Regicide and genocide are both crimes but there is a vast difference in scale. <\/p>\n
Satire, as defined by Wikipedia, is \"a genre of literature, and sometimes graphic and performing arts, in which vices, follies, abuses, and shortcomings are held up to ridicule, ideally with the intent of shaming individuals, corporations, government or society itself, into improvement.\" <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest:<\/p>\n
Satire and Sanity: Where Do You Draw the Line? (News Analysis)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \"We have the right to make dumb jokes.\" -- Tina Fey I'm a free speech advocate. I've been arrested and I have served jail time for exercising my First Amendment rights. As a reporter, magazine editor and political cartoonist, I've received complaints (and a few rare death threats) for my work. Continue reading