{"id":174037,"date":"2015-01-12T22:05:16","date_gmt":"2015-01-13T03:05:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/report-nsas-prism-surveillance-program-was-subject-to-fbi-oversight.php"},"modified":"2015-01-12T22:05:16","modified_gmt":"2015-01-13T03:05:16","slug":"report-nsas-prism-surveillance-program-was-subject-to-fbi-oversight","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nsa-2\/report-nsas-prism-surveillance-program-was-subject-to-fbi-oversight.php","title":{"rendered":"Report: NSA&#39;s PRISM Surveillance Program Was Subject To FBI Oversight"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    FBI officials have been reviewing National Security Agency    surveillance to ensure that messages collected as part of the    PRISM email monitoring program did not belong to American    citizens, according to a declassified report obtained by the    New York Times. While    exactly how the FBI has conducted this oversight remains    unclear, the heavily redacted document appears to show that NSA    surveillance is at least subject to review from outside the    agency.  <\/p>\n<p>    The report said the bureau in 2008 assumed the power to    examine email accounts that the NSA wanted to track under    PRISM, which collects the metadata from Yahoo and Google emails    sent from outside the United States. In 2009, the FBI began to    log its own copies of emails obtained without a warrant, before    recommending more accounts and phone numbers for the NSA to    track in 2012.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Department of Justice report was finished in 2012 and made    entirely classified at that time. The new information was    included as part of a semi-redacted version issued to the Times    in response to a Freedom of Information Act request. Its the    latest glimpse into the surveillance programs and judicial    rulings that authorized them since details were first leaked to    the press by     former NSA contractor Edward Snowden in June 2013.  <\/p>\n<p>    Those disclosures were followed by a     wave of criticism arising from the fear that, with so much    data being collected, its inevitable that innocent Americans    would be swept up in the dragnet. Not so, according to FBI    Inspector General Michael Horowitz, who wrote in the report    that the FBI was doing a good job in making sure that the    email accounts targeted for warrantless collection belonged to    non-citizens abroad.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Times said it got hold of the report late Friday.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ibtimes.com\/report-nsas-prism-surveillance-program-was-subject-fbi-oversight-1780540\/RK=0\/RS=CL7UQcaxrlzcr_y9DQN9kqoS6gE-\" title=\"Report: NSA&#39;s PRISM Surveillance Program Was Subject To FBI Oversight\">Report: NSA&#39;s PRISM Surveillance Program Was Subject To FBI Oversight<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> FBI officials have been reviewing National Security Agency surveillance to ensure that messages collected as part of the PRISM email monitoring program did not belong to American citizens, according to a declassified report obtained by the New York Times. While exactly how the FBI has conducted this oversight remains unclear, the heavily redacted document appears to show that NSA surveillance is at least subject to review from outside the agency. The report said the bureau in 2008 assumed the power to examine email accounts that the NSA wanted to track under PRISM, which collects the metadata from Yahoo and Google emails sent from outside the United States <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nsa-2\/report-nsas-prism-surveillance-program-was-subject-to-fbi-oversight.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261463],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-174037","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nsa-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174037"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=174037"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/174037\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=174037"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=174037"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=174037"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}