{"id":173836,"date":"2015-01-12T21:41:41","date_gmt":"2015-01-13T02:41:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/two-astronomy-missions-back-from-the-brink.php"},"modified":"2015-01-12T21:41:41","modified_gmt":"2015-01-13T02:41:41","slug":"two-astronomy-missions-back-from-the-brink","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/two-astronomy-missions-back-from-the-brink.php","title":{"rendered":"Two astronomy missions back from the brink"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>                Despite losing two of its four reaction wheels,                NASAs Kepler spacecraft has found new lifeand new                planetswith its K2 mission. (credit: NASA                Ames\/JPL-Caltech\/T Pyle )              <\/p>\n<p>          For all the challenges involved in flying a space          astronomy mission, from the technical issues during its          development through launch, scientists want to ensure          that the missions work as long as possible when (and if)          they start operating. In many cases, it may be          scientists only opportunity in their professional          careers to carry out these observations, and use them as          the basis for later missions.        <\/p>\n<p>          Two missions in NASAs portfolio of astronomy missions,          though, recently faced untimely ends, albeit for          different reasons. The Kepler spacecraft ran into          technical problems in 2013 when the second of four          reaction wheels, used to accurately point the spacecraft          at a specific region of the sky, failed. Last year, the          Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy          (SOFIA)not a space mission per se, but an airborne          observatory carrying out observations not possible from          the groundwas facing cancellation by the agency as a          cost-cutting measure.        <\/p>\n<p>          Today, though, both Kepler and SOFIA have survived their          brushes with programmatic death. SOFIA got mostbut not          allof its funding back in the final fiscal year 2015          spending bill, enough to keep the airborne observatory          flying. Kepler, meanwhile, has found success in an          alternative mission, even as scientists continue to          analyze the data it collected in its four-year original          mission.        <\/p>\n<p>          SOFIA was in the process of being declared operational          last year when it was hit with a budgetary surprise. The          Obama Administrations 2015 budget request slashed the          projects budget from $87.4 million it received in 2014          to only $12.3 million. NASA said constrained budgets          forced it to make the decision to cut SOFIA funding. It          turned out that we had to make very difficult choices          about where we go with astrophysics and planetary science          and Earth science, and SOFIA happened to be what fell off          the plate this time, administrator Charles Bolden said          last March (see Aborted          takeoff, The Space Review, March 17, 2014).        <\/p>\n<p>          A few months later, SOFIAs fortunes were changing. The          House of Representatives passed an appropriations bill in          late May that largely restored the projects budget, back          to $70 million. A bill under consideration (but never          passed) in the Senate offered $87 million for the          project. However, those involved with SOFIA had to wait          until Congress passed the omnibus spending bill last          month to officially be out of the woods. That bill, like          the House version, provides $70 million for SOFIA.        <\/p>\n<p>          That amount is enough to allow SOFIA to resume science          observations later this month (it had been undergoing          maintenance for the second half of 2014), although          project officials said last week theyre still working to          determine the effect the lower funding levela 20-percent          cut versus 2014will have on operations.        <\/p>\n<p>          There will be some impacts due to the cut for this          year, SOFIA project scientist Pamela Marcum said at a          SOFIA town hall meeting last week at the 225th Meeting          of the American Astronomical Society (AAS) in Seattle.        <\/p>\n<p>          Marcum said the project is assuming that the 2015 funding          level is a transient dip that will be restored to the          earlier, higher level in future budgets. Therefore, the          decisions we are making to address the budget challenge          for this year should not have permanent ripple effects          for the duration of the program, she said, although she          did not disclose the options under discussion to          implement that cut.        <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/2674\/1\/RK=0\/RS=.ZVGUzWLk_ARMXRR5uvUSMTkzjA-\" title=\"Two astronomy missions back from the brink\">Two astronomy missions back from the brink<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Despite losing two of its four reaction wheels, NASAs Kepler spacecraft has found new lifeand new planetswith its K2 mission. (credit: NASA Ames\/JPL-Caltech\/T Pyle ) For all the challenges involved in flying a space astronomy mission, from the technical issues during its development through launch, scientists want to ensure that the missions work as long as possible when (and if) they start operating. In many cases, it may be scientists only opportunity in their professional careers to carry out these observations, and use them as the basis for later missions <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astronomy\/two-astronomy-missions-back-from-the-brink.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-173836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astronomy"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173836"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=173836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=173836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=173836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=173836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}