{"id":159603,"date":"2014-11-16T19:48:28","date_gmt":"2014-11-17T00:48:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/glaxosmithkline-tops-table-in-effort-to-get-drugs-to-developing-countries.php"},"modified":"2014-11-16T19:48:28","modified_gmt":"2014-11-17T00:48:28","slug":"glaxosmithkline-tops-table-in-effort-to-get-drugs-to-developing-countries","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/medicine\/glaxosmithkline-tops-table-in-effort-to-get-drugs-to-developing-countries.php","title":{"rendered":"GlaxoSmithKline tops table in effort to get drugs to developing countries"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  A biennial access to medicine index says that leading  pharmaceutical companies are doing more to get drugs to people in  developing countries. Photograph: Alamy<\/p>\n<p>    GlaxoSmithKline has    once again topped a league table that measures the major    pharmaceuticals companies efforts in enabling people in    developing countries to get the drugs they need, while rivals    Pfizer and Sanofi have slipped down the rankings.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Netherlands-based non-profit Access to Medicine foundation    said that an estimated 2 billion people around the world still    do not have access to the medicines they need.  <\/p>\n<p>    But, it added, the companies often called big pharma are    increasingly working to improve the situation. They are not    acting for altruistic reasons, but partly because they see a    commercial opportunity, especially in middle-income countries    such as China, South Africa and Brazil, which account for just under half    the worlds population.  <\/p>\n<p>    The latest biennial access to medicine index shows GSK came    first for a fourth year although its score was lower than    in 2012. It was closely followed by Danish diabetes    specialist Novo Nordisk, American firm Johnson & Johnson    and Switzerlands Novartis.  <\/p>\n<p>    Twenty of the worlds largest drug companies are assessed on a    range of measures, including their willingness to discount    prices in poor countries, research on neglected tropical    diseases, lobbying, patent policies, breaches of codes of    conduct, corruption or bribery, transparency and conduct in    clinical trials.  <\/p>\n<p>    GSK was recently found guilty of    bribery by a Chinese court and fined 3bn yuan (300m) by    the government in Bejing, but the ranking does not take this    into account. If it had, GSK would probably still have come    first, said Wim Leereveld, who devised the index, owing to its    activities in developing countries and GSK boss Sir Andrew    Wittys overhaul of sales practices in the US. Witty said:    There is more that we can do and are doing. This year, the    index is tougher than ever. It challenges us to think harder    about how we drive innovation and enable access to our    products. This is a challenge that we are ready and willing to    take on. We will continue to push ourselves to go further and    faster to make sure our medicines and vaccines reach more    people.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pfizer fell to 16th    place from 11th, while Frances Sanofi dropped to eighth place    from third. Neither has provided evidence of significant    improvement in access to medicine since 2012, and have been    overtaken by other companies, the report said. The researchers    found little evidence that Pfizers pricing strategies help the    poorest people while the share of its research pipeline    dedicated to diseases prevalent in developing countries is    relatively small, and has shrunk since the 2012 index.  <\/p>\n<p>    Pfizer said: Pfizer continues to pursue a social investment    strategy and is undertaking work to find new mechanisms to    improve access to medicines for low-income patients.The report    also found that more than half the companies scored (11) are    working on medicines tailored for children, with 7% of the    overall research pipeline devoted to child-size drugs in    areas such as tuberculosis and HIV\/Aids.  <\/p>\n<p>    Five companies are developing more than half of the products in    the research pipeline for developing countries  Novartis, Johnson & Johnson, GSK, AbbVie    and Sanofi.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read more here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.theguardian.com\/c\/34708\/f\/663828\/s\/4089bf3d\/sc\/30\/l\/0L0Stheguardian0N0Cbusiness0C20A140Cnov0C170Cgsk0Etop0Etable0Efor0Edrugs0Eaccess0Edeveloping0Ecoountries\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=GjUHtPJXyCExxNUjSkJORxPzIto-\" title=\"GlaxoSmithKline tops table in effort to get drugs to developing countries\">GlaxoSmithKline tops table in effort to get drugs to developing countries<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A biennial access to medicine index says that leading pharmaceutical companies are doing more to get drugs to people in developing countries. Photograph: Alamy GlaxoSmithKline has once again topped a league table that measures the major pharmaceuticals companies efforts in enabling people in developing countries to get the drugs they need, while rivals Pfizer and Sanofi have slipped down the rankings. The Netherlands-based non-profit Access to Medicine foundation said that an estimated 2 billion people around the world still do not have access to the medicines they need <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/medicine\/glaxosmithkline-tops-table-in-effort-to-get-drugs-to-developing-countries.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[35],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-159603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-medicine"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159603"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=159603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/159603\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=159603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=159603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=159603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}