{"id":154691,"date":"2014-10-29T07:00:28","date_gmt":"2014-10-29T11:00:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/cryptocurrency-the-new-palgrave-dictionary-of-economics.php"},"modified":"2014-10-29T07:00:28","modified_gmt":"2014-10-29T11:00:28","slug":"cryptocurrency-the-new-palgrave-dictionary-of-economics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/cryptocurrency-2\/cryptocurrency-the-new-palgrave-dictionary-of-economics.php","title":{"rendered":"cryptocurrency : The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>  Cryptocurrency is the name given to a system that uses  cryptography to allow the secure transfer and exchange of digital  tokens in a distributed and decentralised manner. These tokens  can be traded at market rates for fiat currencies. The first  cryptocurrency was Bitcoin, which began trading in January 2009.  Since then, many other cryptocurrencies have been created  employing the same innovations that Bitcoin introduced, but  changing some of the specific parameters of their governing  algorithms. The two major innovations that Bitcoin introduced,  and which made cryptocurrencies possible, were solutions to two  long-standing problems in computer science: the double-spending  problem and the Byzantine Generals Problem.<\/p>\n<p>    Until the invention of Bitcoin, it was impossible for two    parties to transact electronically without employing a trusted    third party intermediary. The reason was a conundrum known to    computer scientists as the double spending problem, which has    plagued attempts to create electronic cash since the dawn of    the Internet.  <\/p>\n<p>    To understand the problem, first consider how physical cash    transactions work. The bearer of a physical currency note can    hand it over to another person, who can then verify that he is    the sole possessor of that note by simply looking at his hands.    For example, if Alice hands Bob a $100 bill, Bob now has it and    Alice does not. Bob can easily verify his possession of the    $100 bill and, implicitly, that Alice no longer has it.    Physical cash transfers are also final, in the sense that to    reverse a transaction the new bearer must give back the    currency note. In our example, Bob would have to hand the $100    bill back to Alice. Given all of these properties, cash makes    it possible for different parties, including strangers, to    transact without trusting each other.  <\/p>\n<p>    Now, consider how electronic cash might work. Obviously, paper    notes would be out of the picture. There would have to be some    kind of digital representation of currency. Essentially,    instead of a $100 bill, we might imagine a $100 computer file.    When Alice wants to send $100 to Bob, she attaches a $100 file    to a message and sends it to him. The problem, as anyone who    has sent an email attachment knows, is that sending a file does    not delete it from ones computer. Alice will retain a perfect    digital copy of the $100 she sends Bob, and this would allow    her to spend the same $100 a second time, or indeed a third and    fourth. Alice could promise to Bob that she will delete the    file once he has a copy, but Bob has no way to verify this    without trusting Alice.  <\/p>\n<p>    Until recently, the only way to overcome the double spending    problem was to employ a trusted third party intermediary. In    our example, both Alice and Bob would have an account with a    third party that they each trust, such as PayPal. Trusted    intermediaries like PayPal keep a ledger of all account    balances and transactions. When Alice wants to send $100 to    Bob, she tells PayPal, which in turn deducts the amount from    her account and adds it to Bobs. The transaction reconciles to    zero. Alice cannot spend the same $100, and Bob relies on    PayPal, which he trusts, to verify this. At the end of the day,    all transfers among all accounts reconcile to zero. Note,    however, that unlike cash, transactions that involve a third    party intermediary are not final, as we have defined it,    because transactions can be reversed by the third party.  <\/p>\n<p>    Like PayPal, the Bitcoin system employs a ledger, which is    called the block chain. All transactions in the Bitcoin economy    are recorded and reconciled in the block chain. However, unlike    PayPals ledger, the block chain is not maintained by a central    authority. Instead, the block chain is a public document that    is distributed in a peer-to-peer fashion across thousands of    nodes in the Bitcoin network. New transactions are checked    against the block chain to ensure that the same bitcoins have    not been previously spent, but the work of verifying new    transactions is not done by any one trusted third party.    Instead, the work is distributed among thousands of users who    contribute their computing capacity to reconcile and maintain    the block chain ledger. In essence, the whole peer-to-peer    network takes the place of the one trusted third party.  <\/p>\n<p>      Bitcoins solution to the double spending problem       distributing the ledger among the thousands of nodes in a      peer-to-peer network  presents another problem. If every      node on the network has a complete copy of the ledger that      they share with the peers to which they connect, how does a      new node connecting to the network know that she is not being      given a falsified copy of the ledger? How does an existing      node know that she is not getting falsified updates to the      ledger? The difficult task of reaching consensus among      distributed parties who do not trust each other is another      longstanding problem in the computer science literature known      as the Byzantine Generals Problem, which Bitcoin also      elegantly solved.    <\/p>\n<p>      The Byzantine Generals Problem posits that a number of      generals each have their armies camped outside a city that      they have surrounded. The generals know that their numbers      are large enough that if half their combined force attacks at      the same time they will take the city, but if they do not      attack at the same time they will be spread too thinly and      will be defeated. They can only communicate via messenger,      and they have no way of verifying the authenticity of the      messages being relayed. They also suspect that some of the      generals in their ranks are traitors who will send fake      messages along to their peers. How can this large group come      to a consensus on the time of attack without employing trust      and without a central authority, especially when there will      likely be attempts to confuse them with fake messages?    <\/p>\n<p>      In essence, this is the same problem faced by Bitcoins      miners, the specialised nodes that verify new transactions      and add them to the distributed ledger. Bitcoins solution is      to require additions to the ledger to be accompanied by the      solution to a mathematical problem that is very difficult to      solve but simple to verify. (This is much like calculating      prime factors; costly to do, but easy to check.) New      transactions are broadcast in a peer-to-peer fashion across      the network by parties to those transactions. Miners look at      those transactions and confirm by checking their copy of the      ledger (the block chain) that they are not double-spends. If      they are legitimate transactions, miners add them to a queue      of new transactions that they would like to add as a new page      in the ledger (a new block in the block chain). While they      are doing this, they are simultaneously trying to solve a      mathematical problem in which all previous blocks in the      block chain are an input. The miner that successfully solves      the problem broadcasts his solution to the problem along with      the new block to be added to the block chain. The other      miners can easily verify whether the solution to the problem      is correct, and if it is they add that new block to their      copy of the block chain. The process begins anew with the new      block chain as an input of the problem to be solved for the      next block.    <\/p>\n<p>      The mathematical problem in question takes an average of 10      minutes to solve. This is key because the important thing is      not the solution itself, but that the solution proves that      the miner has expended 10 minutes of work. On average, a new      block is added to the block chain every 10 minutes because      the problem that miners must solve takes on average 10      minutes to solve. However, if more miners join the network,      or if computing power improves, the average time between      blocks will decrease. To maintain the rate at which blocks      are added to six per hour, the difficulty of the problem is      adjusted every 2016 blocks (every two weeks). Again, the key      here is to ensure that each block takes about 10 minutes to      discover.    <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Go here to read the rest: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dictionaryofeconomics.com\/article?id=pde2014_C000625\" title=\"cryptocurrency : The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics\">cryptocurrency : The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Cryptocurrency is the name given to a system that uses cryptography to allow the secure transfer and exchange of digital tokens in a distributed and decentralised manner.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/cryptocurrency-2\/cryptocurrency-the-new-palgrave-dictionary-of-economics.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261456],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154691","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cryptocurrency-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154691"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154691"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154691\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154691"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154691"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154691"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}