{"id":154478,"date":"2014-10-29T06:45:35","date_gmt":"2014-10-29T10:45:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/knowing-genetic-risk-for-cancer-may-not-change-behavior.php"},"modified":"2014-10-29T06:45:35","modified_gmt":"2014-10-29T10:45:35","slug":"knowing-genetic-risk-for-cancer-may-not-change-behavior","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-medicine\/knowing-genetic-risk-for-cancer-may-not-change-behavior.php","title":{"rendered":"Knowing Genetic Risk for Cancer May Not Change Behavior"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>By  Randy Dotinga  HealthDay Reporter  <\/p>\n<p>    FRIDAY, Oct. 24, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- As more genetic tests    are developed that spot increased risks for certain cancers,    one might think that high-risk people would be more proactive    about getting screened.  <\/p>\n<p>    But a new study suggests that, at least with colon cancer, knowledge    does not change behavior: People who found out their genes    doubled their risk of colon cancer were no more likely    than people with average risk to get screened.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"It didn't make any difference, not at all,\" said study author    Dr. David Weinberg, chairman of medicine at Fox Chase Cancer    Center in Philadelphia.  <\/p>\n<p>    Weinberg cautioned against using the findings to come to    conclusions about the impacts of genetic tests for other    cancers. Still, he said, the \"modest amount of available data\"    suggests that genetic tests like the colon cancer one -- which    don't confirm a huge increased risk of disease -- don't alter    health habits.  <\/p>\n<p>    The researchers were surprised by the results. \"Our hypothesis    was that this would be effective,\" Weinberg said, especially    considering that a person's genetic makeup is so personal and    \"might be a more compelling motivator than something like their    cholesterol level    or a lifestyle choice like smoking.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Dr. Durado Brooks, director of prostate and colorectal cancer    with the American Cancer Society, agreed with Weinberg that the    finding was surprising.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"The theory around genetic testing is that if you tell people    they're at a higher risk of disease XYZ, the hope is that    they'll modify their behavior,\" Brooks said. \"This does not    support that hope or theory.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Genetic tests have been a hot topic for several years as    companies have begun offering them to the public along with    insight about people's risks of developing various diseases.    One big question remains largely unanswered: What will people    do differently, if anything, once they get a glimpse into what    their medical futures may hold?  <\/p>\n<p>    In this latest study, the researchers focused on 783 people    aged 50 to 79 who hadn't been screened for colon cancer    recently. Of those, 541 of them were told that their genetic    tests revealed their risk of colon cancer was doubled (about 1    in 20).  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.medicinenet.com\/guide.asp?s=rss&k=DailyHealth&a=184887\/RK=0\/RS=fb3sBqZgbRN9rfjGJHejpn.30Tc-\" title=\"Knowing Genetic Risk for Cancer May Not Change Behavior\">Knowing Genetic Risk for Cancer May Not Change Behavior<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> By Randy Dotinga HealthDay Reporter FRIDAY, Oct. 24, 2014 (HealthDay News) -- As more genetic tests are developed that spot increased risks for certain cancers, one might think that high-risk people would be more proactive about getting screened. But a new study suggests that, at least with colon cancer, knowledge does not change behavior: People who found out their genes doubled their risk of colon cancer were no more likely than people with average risk to get screened <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-medicine\/knowing-genetic-risk-for-cancer-may-not-change-behavior.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-154478","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-medicine"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154478"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154478"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154478\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154478"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154478"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154478"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}