{"id":152812,"date":"2014-10-21T09:59:32","date_gmt":"2014-10-21T13:59:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/federal-court-dismisses-spd-cops-lawsuit-decrying-use-of-force-reforms.php"},"modified":"2014-10-21T09:59:32","modified_gmt":"2014-10-21T13:59:32","slug":"federal-court-dismisses-spd-cops-lawsuit-decrying-use-of-force-reforms","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/second-amendment-2\/federal-court-dismisses-spd-cops-lawsuit-decrying-use-of-force-reforms.php","title":{"rendered":"Federal court dismisses SPD cops&#39; lawsuit decrying use-of-force reforms"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    A federal judge filed a ruling Monday that eviscerated the    lawsuit filed by 126 Seattle cops decrying    their employer's new use-of-force policies.  <\/p>\n<p>    The cops filed a suit in May claiming that federally mandated use-of-force policies    intended to correct a 2011 Department of Justice finding of \"pattern    of excessive force\" in the department violated officers'    constitutional rights to self-defense and legal searches and    seizures.  <\/p>\n<p>    The suit was filed against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder,    the City of Seattle, Mayor Ed Murray, former Mayor Mike McGinn,    the Seattle police chief, City Attorney Pete Holmes and Merrick    Bobb, the Department of Justice's monitor of the Seattle Police    Department, among several others.  <\/p>\n<p>    The lawsuit argued that the new force guidelines, which took    effect Jan. 1, violated officers' Second Amendment right to    bear arms for the purpose of self-defense, as well as a Fourth    Amendment right to be protected from illegal seizures. The    complaint also alleged a violation of the Equal Protection    Clause, saying the new force policies burdened their    fundamental rights.  <\/p>\n<p>    Read more background on the lawsuit    here.  <\/p>\n<p>    At the time, the Seattle Police Department distanced itself    from the claims of its officers and U.S. Attorney Jenny Durkan    derided the lawsuit as \"without merit.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Judge Marsha Pechman seemed to agree in her Monday dismissal of    the lawsuit.  <\/p>\n<p>    First, she granted Bobb's motion to dismiss the suit against    him because he is legally immune from lawsuits as an actor of    the federal court at the behest of a judge.  <\/p>\n<p>    As for the Second Amendment complaint, Pechman wrote, \"(W)hile    the Second Amendment protects and individual's right to bear    arms, the Second Amendment does not provide that individuals    have a right to use a firearm in any particular way.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    She goes on:  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Excerpt from: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.seattlepi.com\/local\/article\/Federal-court-dismisses-SPD-cops-lawsuit-5835060.php\/RK=0\/RS=apPNkraMGzD4ZSv.6Voy6Wibd7M-\" title=\"Federal court dismisses SPD cops&#39; lawsuit decrying use-of-force reforms\">Federal court dismisses SPD cops&#39; lawsuit decrying use-of-force reforms<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> A federal judge filed a ruling Monday that eviscerated the lawsuit filed by 126 Seattle cops decrying their employer's new use-of-force policies. The cops filed a suit in May claiming that federally mandated use-of-force policies intended to correct a 2011 Department of Justice finding of \"pattern of excessive force\" in the department violated officers' constitutional rights to self-defense and legal searches and seizures. The suit was filed against U.S.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/second-amendment-2\/federal-court-dismisses-spd-cops-lawsuit-decrying-use-of-force-reforms.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261460],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-152812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-second-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152812"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=152812"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/152812\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=152812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=152812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=152812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}