{"id":15113,"date":"2010-04-17T08:10:24","date_gmt":"2010-04-17T08:10:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/thoughts-on-obama%e2%80%99s-nasa-speech\/"},"modified":"2010-04-17T08:10:24","modified_gmt":"2010-04-17T08:10:24","slug":"thoughts-on-obama%e2%80%99s-nasa-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/thoughts-on-obama%e2%80%99s-nasa-speech.php","title":{"rendered":"Thoughts on Obama\u2019s NASA speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There were no surprises in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nasa.gov\/about\/obama_ksc_pod.html\" target=\"_blank\">President  Obama&#8217;s speech<\/a> on space policy delivered today at Kennedy Space  Center.<\/p>\n<p>He reiterated that NASA will build a Crew Return Vehicle  for the ISS based on the Orion capsule, begin development of heavy-lift  rockets, expand scientific and robotic research, and begin a series of  programs intended to expand the state-of-the-art in space technology and  on-orbit operations.<\/p>\n<p><span><\/span><\/p>\n<p>There was no mention of the much-rumored  Shuttle extension.\u00a0 Instead, President Obama announced that NASA  Administrator Charles Bolden had been tasked to put together a workforce  realignment program by August.<\/p>\n<p>While the President&#8217;s speech did  not have the Cold War urgency of Kennedy&#8217;s challenge to beat the Soviets  to the Moon, it was a clear recognition that we cannot sustainably  explore and develop the solar system for the benefit of humanity by  doing the same things over and over again.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly,  President Obama indicated that his ultimate goal is to build a virtually  indefinite human presence in space with the United States at the lead.\u00a0  He set milestones of heavy-lift rocket construction beginning in 2015,  manned long-duration missions beyond Low Earth Orbit (perhaps to an  asteroid) by 2025, and manned missions to Mars orbit in the 2030s.<\/p>\n<p>I  disagree with his &#8220;been there, done that&#8221; attitude about the Moon, as  it was recognized as a viable exploration destination by the Augustine  Commission and recent discoveries by orbiting probes indicate there is  much more to it than we first imagined.\u00a0 However, I don&#8217;t think we  should let &#8216;perfect&#8217; be the enemy of the &#8216;good&#8217;.\u00a0 The focus on building capabilities and deciding destinations based on their merit means the door is not fully closed.<\/p>\n<p>As was indicated  in the center assignments released by NASA Headquarters, Johnson Space  Center will be home to the ISS extension, a deputy program office for  the Commercial Crew Development program, and the Flagship Technology  Demonstrators Program.\u00a0 Mission Control, the Astronaut Office, and  training functions will also stay at JSC.<\/p>\n<p>The International Space  Station is an asset now and a valuable platform for testing exploration  technologies on-orbit and sustained microgravity science research.\u00a0  JSC&#8217;s participation in the Commercial Crew Development program will  ensure that the highest safety and mission assurance standards are kept.<\/p>\n<p>I  am particularly interested in the Flagship Demonstrators, though.\u00a0 This  program will put JSC on the forefront of developing and testing, both  on the ground and on-orbit, new operational technologies for space  transportation.\u00a0 There will be four projects in this new program.<\/p>\n<p>The  first three are already identified &#8211; automated docking &amp;  rendezvous, inflatable and\/or lightweight structures, and in-orbit  propellant storage &amp; transfer.\u00a0 The fourth project is likely to be  closed-loop life support demonstration or advanced Entry\/Descent\/Landing  systems.<\/p>\n<p>All of these are enablers for building an in-space  transportation system that cycles between destinations and will allow us  to only launch what we need for a given mission.\u00a0 The fact that JSC has  been given the lead for this program is a testament to the  institutional knowledge and engineering capabilities of the center.<\/p>\n<p>Space  policy consultant Angela Peura describes this as &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.thespacereview.com\/article\/1604\/1\">Gemini on steroids<\/a>,&#8221;  in direct contrast to former NASA administrator Michael Griffin&#8217;s  description of the Constellation Program as &#8220;Apollo on steroids.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The  simple reality here is that decisions were made six years ago that put  us on this path.\u00a0 Congress stood by and did nothing while the march to  Shuttle retirement began.\u00a0 Congress did not object when President Bush  did not put in his own budget proposal the funding he had promised for  the Constellation Program.<\/p>\n<p>Once again, we found ourselves in a  situation &#8211; just as in Shuttle &#8211; where attempts to short-change  development costs in the near-term were leading to increased operational  costs further down stream.\u00a0 Ares I was going to cost 50% more than the  Shuttle to operate to put half the crew and a fraction of the cargo in  orbit.\u00a0 Not only that, it wasn&#8217;t even likely to enter service before ISS  decommissioning.<\/p>\n<p>The Augustine Committee found that the  Constellation Program would have, first, had a crew launcher with no  destination, and, then, a heavy-lift launcher with no lunar lander to  deploy.\u00a0 Rather than punt this problem to another President to deal  with, President Obama decided to expend the political capital and risk  the popular backlash to face this problem now.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t agree with  all the decisions in the proposal &#8211; particularly, retaining Orion as a crew lifeboat for the ISS &#8211; and I think the rollout was awful,  but I do think this strategy puts us on the right path forward.\u00a0 NASA  staff are working even now on developing this strategy into actionable  plans and programs.\u00a0 With the exception of the Orion lifeboat, the  President was right to leave the technical decisions to those with the  best knowledge to make them.<\/p>\n<p>Most Houston-area politicians are, <a href=\"http:\/\/app1.kuhf.org\/houston_public_radio-news-display.php?articles_id=1271367889\" target=\"_blank\">predictably<\/a>,  steadfast in their opposition to the  President&#8217;s plan and continue to  fight for the status quo.\u00a0 While Rep.  Olson and his allies may be hardening their stance, some Congresspersons  representing other NASA centers have expressed their provisional  support for the new plan and several leading aerospace contractors have  dropped lobbying efforts for the Constellation Program.<\/p>\n<p>Despite  the accusations from some pundits that Texas is being retaliated  against for being predominantly Republican, I think JSC has still gotten  a  fair deal in the new plan.<\/p>\n<p>The President has set his  policy, now it&#8217;s time for those of us in the trenches to figure out how to  implement it.\u00a0 There is opportunity in the midst of uncertainty and we  shouldn&#8217;t squander this chance to transform the way we explore space.<\/p>\n<p><em>Cross-posted at <a href=\"http:\/\/commons.chron.com\/jkugler\/blog\" target=\"_blank\">A World With No Boundaries<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There were no surprises in President Obama&#8217;s speech on space policy delivered today at Kennedy Space Center. He reiterated that NASA will build a Crew Return Vehicle for the ISS based on the Orion capsule, begin development of heavy-lift rockets, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/nasa\/thoughts-on-obama%e2%80%99s-nasa-speech.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-15113","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nasa"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15113"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=15113"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/15113\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=15113"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=15113"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=15113"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}