{"id":149074,"date":"2014-10-08T07:59:27","date_gmt":"2014-10-08T11:59:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/twitter-sues-the-government-for-violating-its-first-amendment-rights.php"},"modified":"2014-10-08T07:59:27","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T11:59:27","slug":"twitter-sues-the-government-for-violating-its-first-amendment-rights","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/twitter-sues-the-government-for-violating-its-first-amendment-rights.php","title":{"rendered":"Twitter Sues the Government for Violating Its First Amendment Rights"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Twitter just sued the federal    government over restrictions the government places on how much    the company can disclose about surveillance requests it    receives.  <\/p>\n<p>    For months, Twitter has tried to    negotiate with the government to expand the kind of information    that it and other companies are allowed to disclose. But it    failed. Today, Twitter asserts in its suit that preventing the    company from telling users how often the government submits    national security requests for user data is a violation of the    First Amendment.  <\/p>\n<p>    The move goes a step beyond a    challenge filed by Google and other companies last year that    also sought permission on First Amendment grounds to disclose    how often it receives national security requests for data. In    the wake of the Edward Snowden leaks about government spying    and the so-called    PRISM program, the companies sought to add statistics about    national security requests to transparency reports that some of    them were already publishing. Up to that point, the reports had    revealed only the number of general law enforcement requests    for data that the companies received each year, not so-called    National Security Letters the companies received for data or    other national security requests submitted with a court order    from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Court.  <\/p>\n<p>    The companies asserted that    without the ability to disclose more details about the data    requests they received, the public was left to speculate wildly    that they were providing unfettered access to user data or    giving the government information in bulk. If the public knew    how few requests for data they actually received, they argued,    people would be re-assured that this was not the case.  <\/p>\n<p>    [G]overnment nondisclosure    obligations regarding the number of FISA national security    requests that Google receives, as well as the number of    accounts covered by those requests, fuel that speculation,    Googles Chief Legal Officer David Drummond wrote in a letter    to the attorney general and FBI. Googles numbers would    clearly show that our compliance with these requests falls far    short of the claims being made. Google has nothing to    hide.  <\/p>\n<p>    Although the companies won a    partial victory in negotiation when the government agreed    earlier this year to let them publish broad statistics about    national security requests they received, the statistics turned    out to be nothing more than a coy tease. They provided no real    transparency. The companies were only allowed to publish a    range of the requests they received. For example, they were    only allowed to disclose that they had received between 0 and    999 national security requests for data. They also had a    six-month delay imposed on them, prohibiting them from    disclosing certain sets of information, and a two-year delay    for disclosing other sets of data.  <\/p>\n<p>    In August, Google and Microsoft    pressed for the    right to release more statistics, including a breakdown of    the number of requests specifically targeting user content,    versus requests seeking metadata.  <\/p>\n<p>    Twitter was not part of the legal    challenges filed by the other companies but engaged in its own    battle for more transparency. Last April, the company submitted    a draft of the kind of transparency report it sought to make    public.  <\/p>\n<p>    Twitter sought, among other    things, to narrow the scope for reporting statistics. Instead    of reporting requests in a range of 0 to 999, it wanted to be    able to report actual aggregate numbers for the number of NSL    and FISA orders it received and to be able to break down, in    smaller batches, each type of request. For example, it wanted    to be able to report the number of NSLs and FISA orders it    received in a range of 1-99.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Justice Department responded    in September that the proposed report contained classified    informationwithout specifying which part of the information    was classifiedthat could not be publicly released under the    current FISA and National Security Letter laws. These statutes    come with a gag order preventing service providers from    disclosing the data requests they receive.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here:<\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/feeds.wired.com\/c\/35185\/f\/661370\/s\/3f36d4ae\/sc\/1\/l\/0L0Swired0N0C20A140C10A0Ctwitter0Esues0Egovernment0C\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=.TfR2uh4G2uOiAkPkx6c7bgUoGY-\" title=\"Twitter Sues the Government for Violating Its First Amendment Rights\">Twitter Sues the Government for Violating Its First Amendment Rights<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Twitter just sued the federal government over restrictions the government places on how much the company can disclose about surveillance requests it receives. For months, Twitter has tried to negotiate with the government to expand the kind of information that it and other companies are allowed to disclose <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/twitter-sues-the-government-for-violating-its-first-amendment-rights.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261459],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149074","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149074"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149074"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149074\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149074"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149074"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149074"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}