{"id":149071,"date":"2014-10-08T07:59:24","date_gmt":"2014-10-08T11:59:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/twitter-rails-at-transparency-report-conditions-files-suit-against-us.php"},"modified":"2014-10-08T07:59:24","modified_gmt":"2014-10-08T11:59:24","slug":"twitter-rails-at-transparency-report-conditions-files-suit-against-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/twitter-rails-at-transparency-report-conditions-files-suit-against-us.php","title":{"rendered":"Twitter rails at transparency report conditions, files suit against US"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Twitter has launched a suit against the US Government. The    lawsuit, filed in the US District Court of Northern California,    demands that Twitter's full transparency report about law    enforcement requests be published in its entirety, and that    restrictions placed on what may be disclosed are illegal under    the First Amendment of the US Constitution.  <\/p>\n<p>    Conditions of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA)    prevent companies from disclosing exact numbers of requests it    receives in anything but the broadest ranges. Twitter not only    wants to disclose more specific numbers, but also wishes to be    able to say that they received none, if applicable. The company    filed its report, and wanted input on what the government    considered classified in July -- in September, the US    Government declared that \"information contained in the    [transparency] report is classified and cannot be publicly    released.\" Twitter disagrees.  <\/p>\n<p>    Vice President of Twitter Legal Ben Lee wrote that \"It's our belief that we are    entitled under the First Amendment to respond to our users'    concerns and to the statements of U.S. government officials by    providing information about the scope of U.S. government    surveillance -- including what types of legal process have not    been received. We should be free to do this in a meaningful    way, rather than in broad, inexact ranges.\"  <\/p>\n<p>    Lee goes on to say that \"the Defendants' position forces    Twitter either to engage in speech that has been preapproved by    government officials or else to refrain from speaking    altogether.\" Additionally, the Twitter-filed complaint says    that the restrictions are \"an unconstitutional prior restraint\"    and \"government viewpoint discrimination\" against Twitter's    right to discuss what it has received for legal process claims.  <\/p>\n<p>    The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, also serving California, is    examining the same issue from a different complainant this    week. A ruling may not come in this week's similar case for    some time.  <\/p>\n<p>    Justice Department spokeswoman Emily Pierce said of the suit    that \"earlier this year, the government addressed similar    concerns raised in a lawsuit brought by several major tech    companies.\" Referring to the current system of transparency,    Pierce claimed that \"the parties worked collaboratively to    allow tech companies to provide broad information on government    requests while also protecting national security.\"  <\/p>\n<p>        Twitter FISA complaint to US District Court  <\/p>\n<p>    By Electronista Staff  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the original post here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/electronista.feedsportal.com\/c\/34342\/f\/625515\/s\/3f36e403\/sc\/1\/l\/0L0Smacnn0N0Carticles0C140C10A0C0A70Ctwitter0Blawsuit0Baccuses0Bfbi0Bdoj0Bof0Bfirst0Bamendment0Bviolations0C\/story01.htm\/RK=0\/RS=RmrA59j8IypnhIqDSgb5USk8cf0-\" title=\"Twitter rails at transparency report conditions, files suit against US\">Twitter rails at transparency report conditions, files suit against US<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Twitter has launched a suit against the US Government.  <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/first-amendment-2\/twitter-rails-at-transparency-report-conditions-files-suit-against-us.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[261459],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-149071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-first-amendment-2"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149071"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=149071"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/149071\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=149071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=149071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=149071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}