Polar bears were previously thought to have split from brown bears some 150,000 years ago. But a study of the bears' mitochondrial DNA indicates that they became a distinct species about 600,000 years ago.<\/p>\n
Polar bears have been chilling on the ice far longer than is generally thought, new research suggests, and they probably interbred with brown bears at one point after the two species separated. <\/p>\n
The new German study contradicts data from a study published last July in the journal Current Biology that suggested polar bearsseparated from brown bears150,000 years ago. The new study analyzed the bears' mitochondrial DNA, a special \"additional genome\" that lives in the cell's energy factories and is passed down only from the mother. The new study concludes that the bears became separate species closer to 600,000 years ago. <\/p>\n
If the polar bears were only 150,000 years old, as suggested by the previous study, they would have had to evolve many specialized traits in a curiously brief time, the German researchers said. <\/p>\n
\"I've been long puzzled by the suggestion that the polar bears would have been such a miraculous and rapidly evolving species,\" Frank Hailer of the Senckenberg Nature Research Society in Frankfurt told LiveScience. \"I had this lingering question: Is it really true?\" <\/p>\n
Hailer and his colleagues looked at the polar bear's nuclear DNA, which comes from both parents and is much larger than the mitochondrial genome. [Fun Facts About Polar Bears] <\/p>\n
They compared 9,000 base-pair sequences (the chemicals that make up the \"rungs\" of DNA's ladderlike molecule) from the nuclear DNA of 45 polar, brown and black bears. This comparison let the researchers build a family tree, with the idea that the greater the genetic differences between the species, the farther they were apart in evolutionary time. They were able to estimate when the polar bears and brown bears separated. <\/p>\n
\"We found that polar bears are much older than we previously knew from other studies; their appearance dated to about 600,000 years ago,\" Hailer said. \"That would make sense around that time for something like apolar bear to evolve, because Arctic habitats were much larger than they are today, so there would have been much larger habitats that would have been suitable for a species like a polar bear.\" <\/p>\n
The researchers say the mitochondrial DNA data could have come from a hybridization event between polar and brown bears 150,000 years ago during the last warm interglacial period. During that time, sea ice melted and polar bears took to the shores, where they came intocontact with brown bears. <\/p>\n
The researchers say this hybridization (similar to the hybrid \"grolar\" or \"pizzly\" bears seen in recent years in Canada) would have introduced the brown bear mitochondrial DNA into the polar bear population. If the DNA from the brown bears helped the polar bears survive the warm period, it's possible it could have easily spread throughout the population. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
See the original post here: Polar bears were previously thought to have split from brown bears some 150,000 years ago. Continue reading
\nPolar bears emerged far earlier than thought, DNA study indicates<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"