This is a perfect example of how people don’t think about the consequences of their actions when it comes to the environment.\u00a0 I can’t imagine how bad the problem was to go to these lengths and why there was nothing else they could do about it. Six thousand trees!\u00a0\u00a0 This is what not to do if you have a human behavior problem. People need to think about what happens to the environment if forests are cleared, think about the whole ecosystem that is destroyed, and whether it’s a wise option.<\/p>\n
6,000 Trees Axed to Prevent Sex in Forest<\/p>\n
As many as 6,000 trees have been felled in a forest near a British town to prevent couples from having sex there, a media report said.<\/p>\n
Trees cut along the A666<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
The trees were hacked at the 12-hectare site on the outskirts of Darwen, Lancashire, after a \u201chealth and safety survey\u201d, Daily Express reported on Tuesday. Officials say the forest that runs for kilometres along the busy A666* was cleared as some of the trees, planted after the Second World War, were in danger of falling.<\/p>\n
Police and councillors have, however, confirmed that another reason was to discourage strangers from the known \u201cdogging\u201d area. Dogging is a term for people having sex with strangers in public places, or watching others have sex, often in woods or country lay-bys.<\/p>\n
Backlash<\/p>\n
The felling of 6,000 trees to try to stop couples having sex there has prompted an angry backlash. \u201cIt\u2019s awful that a public green space, an asset to the local community, has been destroyed mindlessly. If the law was enforced properly then there would be no need to chop down these trees,\u201d Matthew Elliott, chief executive of the TaxPayers\u2019 Alliance, was quoted as saying.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Alistair Foster, an environmentalist, said: \u201cIt is such a terrible thing to do. Old trees do not just fall down. What next, chop down 300-year-old oak trees in case they suddenly fall over one day? And to do it to reduce people having sex in the woods is farcical.\u201d Terry Hardman, who travels past the clearance site every day, said that the work had \u201cabsolutely devastated the area.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cThere was a massive forest that\u2019s been reduced to open space. Surely that can\u2019t be good for the environmental situation?\u201d<\/p>\n
Sergeant Mark Wilson said that the sexual activities in the area were \u201can ongoing problem and very worrying for members of the public\u201d. \u201cIt\u2019s far too early to tell if cutting the trees back has had any impact on the dogging situation, but we\u2019ll be paying regular attention to the area.\u201d<\/p>\n
Double whammy<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m more than happy this is being carried out and it has a double whammy in terms of the sexual behaviour. I\u2019ve heard anecdotally that since the trees have been cleared it\u2019s quietened down a lot,\u201d ward councillor Jean Rigby was quoted as saying.<\/p>\n
So if you have a problem in the trees cut them down, [...]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
This is a perfect example of how people don’t think about the consequences of their actions when it comes to the environment.\u00a0 I can’t imagine how bad the problem was to go to these lengths and why there was nothing … Continue reading