{"id":129136,"date":"2014-05-01T21:45:35","date_gmt":"2014-05-02T01:45:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/plant-engineers-sow-debate.php"},"modified":"2014-05-01T21:45:35","modified_gmt":"2014-05-02T01:45:35","slug":"plant-engineers-sow-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/plant-engineers-sow-debate.php","title":{"rendered":"Plant Engineers Sow Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    Today virtually everything we eat is produced from seeds that    have been genetically altered in some way. New methods of plant    tinkering have emerged over the generations and so, too, have    the fears  <\/p>\n<p>    Today virtually everything we eat is produced from seeds that    have been genetically altered in one way or another.    Credit: Thinkstock  <\/p>\n<p>    Editor's note: The following is the introduction to the May    2014 issue of Scientific American Classics:    The    Birth of the Great GMO Debate.  <\/p>\n<p>    The idea of intentionally infecting a plant    with a bacterium might seem strange. Just three decades ago,    however, researchers discovered that they could use this    infection to deliver new and potentially useful genes into    crops.  <\/p>\n<p>    What has long appeared to be simply the agent of a bothersome    plant disease is likely to become a major tool for the genetic    manipulation of plants: for putting new genes into plants and    thereby giving rise to new varieties with desired traits,    announced acclaimed scientist Mary-Dell Chilton in 1983 in a        pioneering article, one of many in this    collection from the archives of Scientific    American. Today genes introduced this way are yielding    some of the most exciting new approaches to food securityas    well as a hearty amount of debate.  <\/p>\n<p>    Despite the excitement about the potential benefits of genetic    engineering 30 years ago, the broader historical perspective    highlighted in this collection reveals that this is just one of    many thrilling and surprising advances in the long history of    plant genetic alteration, which began well before this    retrospective issue could document. (Scientific    American extends back only to 1845.) Consider the    assessment of the new technology of cross-pollination described    in 1717 by botanist Richard Bradley: A curious person may by    this knowledge produce such rare kinds of plants as have not    yet been heard of.  <\/p>\n<p>    For 10,000 years, in fact, we have altered the genetic makeup    of our crops. For example, the ancient ancestor of modern corn    was created some 6,000 years ago by Native Americans who    domesticated a wild plant called teosinte, which looks nothing    like a modern corn plant. If humans still depended on this wild    relative, we would need hundreds, if not thousands, of times    more plantsand acresto replace corn.  <\/p>\n<p>    Today virtually everything we eat is produced from seeds that    have been genetically altered in one way or another. The old    approaches were crude and have been refined over the centuries.    Modern methods include grafting and forced pollination (mixing    genes of distantly related species) and radiation treatments to    create random mutations in seeds. The newest method is genetic    engineeringa technology developed after scientists observed    that the bothersome plant pathogen Agrobacterium    tumefaciens habitually introduced its own genes into    plants. With a little laboratory work, the bacterium can    instead implant desirable genes, such as those that increase    nutrients or help the plant resist pests or drought.  <\/p>\n<p>    The planting of genetically engineered crops during the past 20    years has drastically reduced the amount of synthetic    insecticides sprayed worldwide, shifted the use of herbicides    to those that are less toxic, rescued the U.S. papaya industry    from disease, and benefited the health and well-being of    farmers and their families and consumers. Every scientific    review of the crops on the market so far has concluded that the    plants are safe to eat.  <\/p>\n<p>    Just as the excitement surrounding the benefits of genetic    engineering paralleled those of our predecessors, so, too, has    the fear of plant tinkering technologies persisted over time.    Consider the comments of Maxwell T. Masters, president of the    International Conference of Hybridization, in his 1899    Scientific American article: Many worthy people    objected to the production of hybrids on the ground that it was    an impious interference with the laws of Nature. Today we are    all too familiar with similar arguments about the application    of genetic engineering in agriculture.  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>See the rest here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.scientificamerican.com\/article\/plant-engineers-sow-debate\" title=\"Plant Engineers Sow Debate\">Plant Engineers Sow Debate<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Today virtually everything we eat is produced from seeds that have been genetically altered in some way. New methods of plant tinkering have emerged over the generations and so, too, have the fears Today virtually everything we eat is produced from seeds that have been genetically altered in one way or another <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/genetic-engineering\/plant-engineers-sow-debate.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-129136","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-genetic-engineering"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129136"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129136"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129136\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129136"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129136"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129136"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}