hide captionThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in two cases over whether law enforcement can search cellphones obtained at an arrest without a warrant. <\/p>\n
The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in two cases over whether law enforcement can search cellphones obtained at an arrest without a warrant. <\/p>\n
The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday in two cases testing whether police can search cellphones without a warrant at the time of an arrest, be it for a traffic violation or for a felony. <\/p>\n
The Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches to require that police obtain a search warrant from a neutral judge upon a showing that there is probable cause to believe a crime has been committed. The warrant is to specify where the search will be conducted and the evidence being sought. <\/p>\n
There are, however, exceptions to the warrant requirement. <\/p>\n
The court has long allowed police to search people without a warrant at the time of their arrest. But as privacy advocate Andrew Pincus points out, until very recently, those searches were self-limiting, meaning they were limited by the amount of information an individual could carry on his person. <\/p>\n
Now, however, because cellphones can store so much information, a person can carry more than any one of the Founding Fathers had amassed in a lifetime. <\/p>\n
\"The Library of Congress' entire collection of James Madison's papers is 72,000 pages,\" Pincus observes, adding, \"he couldn't have carried them. They would have weighed 675 pounds.\" And, says Pincus, today's cellphones carry 100 times that much information. <\/p>\n
Indeed, the iPhone 5 in its smallest storage version keeps 800 million words of text, Pincus says. That's enough to fill more than a football field's length of books, or over 8,000 photos, 260,000 private voice mails and hundreds of home videos. <\/p>\n
\"It's misleading to even think of them as phones,\" says George Washington University professor Orin Kerr, an expert on technology and the law. They are \"general purpose computers\" that have a bunch of apps, one of which is the telephone function. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original post:<\/p>\n
Weighing The Risks Of Warrantless Phone Searches During Arrests<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" hide captionThe Supreme Court is hearing arguments in two cases over whether law enforcement can search cellphones obtained at an arrest without a warrant. The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in two cases over whether law enforcement can search cellphones obtained at an arrest without a warrant. Continue reading