By Marianne Goodland <\/p>\n
Journal-Advocate legislative reporter <\/p>\n
A resolution to add \"electronic data\" to the Colorado constitution's equivalent of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution got unanimous support this week from a Senate committee. <\/p>\n
The Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday gave a 5-0 vote to Senate Concurrent Resolution 14-002, sponsored by Sen. Greg Brophy (R-Wray) and Senate President Morgan Carroll (D-Aurora). The resolution, which asks for voter approval in November, would add \"electronic data\" to the list of items protected from unreasonable search and seizure in Article 2, Section 7 of the Colorado constitution. <\/p>\n
The resolution now goes to the full Senate. Two-thirds of the Senate, or 24 votes, are needed for the resolution to go on to the House. <\/p>\n
While the committee was unanimous in its support of SCR 2, the legal community was not. Opposition came from the Colorado Attorney General, police chiefs, and the Colorado District Attorneys' Council. The Colorado County Sheriffs' Association, the Libertarian Party and the Colorado chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) all spoke in favor of SCR 2. <\/p>\n
The courts are weighing this question now, said Brophy in introducing the resolution. \"It's appropriate that the Legislature also weigh in.\" He noted that electronic data should be private, the same as if it were stored in a file cabinet in the home. But government agencies aren't treating it that way and are looking at this data without a warrant, he explained. <\/p>\n
Papers and other effects are already protected in the state constitution, but electronic data is the modern equivalent, Carroll said. Law enforcement should interpret it that way, but they don't always do that. \"There should be a reasonable expectation of privacy\" for electronic data. <\/p>\n
Carroll also noted that any data that is encrypted or password protected should be protected under the law, even when it is stored in cyberspace, or the Cloud. \"I don't forego a reasonable expectation of privacy when I enter a physical public domain\" such as Civic Center Park in Denver, she said. The same should apply to electronic data stored in the Cloud. <\/p>\n
Deputy Attorney General Matthew Durkin said the resolution was unnecessary, since the state and federal constitutions already protect electronic data, even if it is not listed. Electronic data is not defined in the resolution, he said, and it could be interpreted in many different ways. Instead, citizens should rely on the judicial branch to make to make that determination, which they have done for more than 200 years. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Continued here: <\/p>\n
Protections for e-data clear Senate committee<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" By Marianne Goodland Journal-Advocate legislative reporter A resolution to add \"electronic data\" to the Colorado constitution's equivalent of the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution got unanimous support this week from a Senate committee. Continue reading