Barking Up the Wrong Free <\/p>\n
I must admit that each time I read a good argument supporting each position (1) the Bible is to be taken literally and (2) the Bible is not to be taken literally, I find I am moved by both positions (Did the Exodus Happen? April 18). They are both intellectually and emotionally fulfilling. The question then becomes, for me, what are my motives in accepting one position as opposed to the other. Which position brings me closer to God, a being I cannot prove exists? And if I cannot prove God exists, though I can experience his existence as I experience love, why am I required to prove these events occurred to a standard of scientific certainty? The desire for proof and certainty becomes the new prison, the new idol, the new Pharaoh, which prevents our heart from completely opening up to freedom so that we can then walk with God, as Moses did, and we can truly live the life of a free Jew. <\/p>\n
Ilbert Philipsvia jewishjournal.com <\/p>\n
To add another well-known name to the discourse, Freud described the story of the Exodus as a pious myth. And yet,in one of his controversial books he wrote profoundly and with reverence about Moses the remarkable national leader of the people of the Exodus. He followed his life from the time he was plucked out of the river until his death at the edge ofthe Promised Land. <\/p>\n
The story of Exodus, regardless how it happened, is a recurring event in Jewish history. It is the eternal struggle of monotheism in apolytheistic world with tragic results. The Exodus from Egypt probably was no different from the exodus of Jews from Muslim Iran, Czarist and Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, or Catholic Spain. The Exileto Babylon and Rome would also classify as areverse exodus. Whether Rabbi Wolpe or Dennis Prager isright is not the question. The issue is whether the unleavened bread displayed on asilver platter in afestive setting is the proper and worthy symbol of the strugglefor freedom by a people willing to suffer and pay the price for it. So we ask: Manishtana? <\/p>\n
Ken LautmanLos Angeles <\/p>\n
To Thine Own Selfie Be True <\/p>\n
Kudos to Danielle Berrin for her informative article on Alan Morinis and the Mussar Institute (Selfie Spirituality, April 18).I was privileged to learn about how effective this ethical system is when I visited the California Institute for Women where my friend, the Rev. Gabbai Shayna Lester, was honored on Pesach by inmates and her peers alike.The inmates both Jews and gentiles who took part in the Mussar classes, learned among other principles the importance of avoidinglashon harah gossip and negative comments about others. And it was reported on several occasions that the parole board looked favorably on this program in their consideration of an inmate being found suitable for parole. <\/p>\n
This was the most moving seder I have ever attended, written by the inmates themselves as part of a creative writing project. The inmates were also able to have a rare real food meal, and to socialize with outsiders like me who take our freedom for granted.I urge my fellow Jews to familiarize themselves with this programs leader, Rabbi Moshe Raphael Halfon, and Am Or Olam. <\/p>\n
Gene Rothman,Culver City <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read more from the original source: <\/p>\n
Letters to the editor: Exodus, spirituality and anti-Semitism<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Barking Up the Wrong Free I must admit that each time I read a good argument supporting each position (1) the Bible is to be taken literally and (2) the Bible is not to be taken literally, I find I am moved by both positions (Did the Exodus Happen? April 18). They are both intellectually and emotionally fulfilling Continue reading