{"id":121626,"date":"2014-04-04T21:40:59","date_gmt":"2014-04-05T01:40:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/uncategorized\/dose-escalated-hypofractionated-imrt-conventional-imrt-for-prostate-cancer-have-like-side-effects.php"},"modified":"2014-04-04T21:40:59","modified_gmt":"2014-04-05T01:40:59","slug":"dose-escalated-hypofractionated-imrt-conventional-imrt-for-prostate-cancer-have-like-side-effects","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astro-physics\/dose-escalated-hypofractionated-imrt-conventional-imrt-for-prostate-cancer-have-like-side-effects.php","title":{"rendered":"Dose-escalated hypofractionated IMRT, conventional IMRT for prostate cancer have like side effects"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>    PUBLIC RELEASE DATE:  <\/p>\n<p>    3-Apr-2014  <\/p>\n<p>    Contact: Brittany Ashcroft    <a href=\"mailto:press@astro.org\">press@astro.org<\/a>    703-839-7336    American Society for Radiation    Oncology<\/p>\n<p>    Fairfax, Va., April 3, 2014Dose-escalated intensity modulated    radiation therapy (IMRT) with use of a moderate    hypofractionation regimen (72 Gy in 2.4 Gy fractions) can    safely treat patients with localized prostate cancer with    limited grade 2 or 3 late toxicity, according to a study    published in the April 1, 2014 edition of the International    Journal of Radiation Oncology  Biology  Physics (Red    Journal), the official scientific journal of the American    Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO).  <\/p>\n<p>    Previous randomized clinical trials have shown that    dose-escalated radiation therapy improves prostate cancer    control compared to lower-dose conventional radiation therapy.    Conventional fractionation of dose-escalated radiation therapy    (1.8 or 2 Gy fractions) can take up to nine weeks to complete,    while hypofractionated radiation therapy can deliver a higher    biologically effective dose over a shorter period of time (six    weeks) and has the potential to increase prostate cancer    control without increasing toxicity. However, there are limited    data on the late toxicity of moderate hypofractionated regimens    for prostate cancer. This randomized trial from the University    of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center compares the late toxicity    outcomes of men with localized prostate cancer treated with    either conventionally fractionated IMRT (CIMRT) or    dose-escalated hypofractionated IMRT (HIMRT).  <\/p>\n<p>    Men with organ-confined prostate cancer were enrolled in this    institutional review board-approved trial from January 2001 to    January 2010 and were randomized to receive either CIMRT (75.6    Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions over eight-and-a-half weeks) or HIMRT    (72 Gy in 2.4 Gy fractions over six weeks). Eligible patients    had biopsy-proven prostate adenocarcinoma; good performance    status; stage T1b-T3b disease; a prostate-specific antigen    (PSA) 20 ng\/ml; a Gleason score <10; and no clinical,    radiographic or pathologic evidence of nodal or bone    metastasis. Patients with stage cT3c or cT4 disease, a history    of prior pelvic radiation therapy, or who received more than    four months of hormone ablation therapy with prior or planned    radical prostate surgery and with concurrent active malignancy    other than nonmetastatic skin cancer or early-stage chronic    lymphocytic leukemia were not eligible for the trial. The    median age of the patient cohort was 68. Of the 203 patients    analyzed in the study, 72 percent had stage T1 disease (146)    and 89 percent had a PSA <10 ng\/ml (181). Thirty-four    percent (70) had Gleason 6 disease, 65 percent (131) had    Gleason 7 disease and 1 percent (2) had Gleason 8 disease.    Patients were classified into low-risk (28 percent = 57),    intermediate risk (71 percent = 144) and high-risk (1 percent =    2) disease using current National Comprehensive Cancer Network    risk-group definitions.  <\/p>\n<p>    All patients were treated with static-field IMRT. One hundred    and one (101) men received CIMRT and 102 men received HIMRT.    Physician-reported toxicity was evaluated for all patients    during treatment and at each follow-up visit. After completion    of radiation therapy, follow-up was conducted at least every    six months for the first two years post-treatment, and annually    thereafter. Median follow-up was six years.  <\/p>\n<p>    Late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were    analyzed in this study, starting 90 days post-treatment, using    modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group toxicity grading. In    the CIMRT arm, 17 percent (17) experienced grade 1 GI toxicity,    4 percent (4) experienced grade 2 GI toxicity and 1 percent (1)    experienced grade 3 GI toxicity. In the HIMRT arm, 26 percent    (27) experienced grade 1 GI toxicity, 9 percent (9) experienced    grade 2 GI toxicity and 2 percent (2) experienced grade 3 GI    toxicity. There was a numeric increase in the absolute    frequency of late GI toxicity for men treated with HIMRT, but    the difference was not statistically significant. The five-year    actuarial grade 2 or 3 late GI toxicity was 5.1 percent (95    percent Confidence Interval (CI)) for patients treated with    CIMRT and 10 percent for patients treated with HIMRT. The    increase in late GI toxicity for men receiving HIMRT was the    result of moderate and high radiation dose to a larger    proportion of the rectum, which suggests that more stringent    dose constraints for the rectum may result in lower late GI    toxicity for those patients.  <\/p>\n<p>    Additionally, there was not a statistically significant    difference in the absolute frequency of late GU toxicity in men    treated with CIMRT or HIMRT. In the CIMRT arm, 15 percent (15)    experienced grade 1 GU toxicity, 14 percent (14) experienced    grade 2 GU toxicity and 1 percent (1) experienced grade 3 GU    toxicity. In the HIMRT arm, 10 percent (10) experienced grade 1    GU toxicity and 15 percent (15) experienced grade 2 GU    toxicity; no patients reported grade 3 GU toxicity. The    five-year actuarial grade 2 or 3 late GU toxicity was 16.5    percent (95 percent CI) for patients treated with CIMRT and    15.8 percent for patients treated with HIMRT.  <\/p>\n<p>    \"These results demonstrate that the length of radiation    treatment for prostate cancer can be safely decreased to six    weeks (from eight-and-a-half weeks) by delivering larger daily    doses of radiation without increasing the urinary and bowel    effects,\" said Karen E. Hoffman, MD, a co-author of the study    and assistant professor in the Division of Radiation Oncology    at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in    Houston. \"Decreasing the length of treatment decreases the cost    and is more convenient for patients.\"  <\/p>\n<p><!-- Auto Generated --><\/p>\n<p>Read the original here: <\/p>\n<p><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.eurekalert.org\/pub_releases\/2014-04\/asfr-dhi040314.php\/RS=^ADAH0G1eW8jP.SWiabbpXSl_O89Rqs-\" title=\"Dose-escalated hypofractionated IMRT, conventional IMRT for prostate cancer have like side effects\">Dose-escalated hypofractionated IMRT, conventional IMRT for prostate cancer have like side effects<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> PUBLIC RELEASE DATE: 3-Apr-2014 Contact: Brittany Ashcroft <a href=\"mailto:press@astro.org\">press@astro.org<\/a> 703-839-7336 American Society for Radiation Oncology Fairfax, Va., April 3, 2014Dose-escalated intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with use of a moderate hypofractionation regimen (72 Gy in 2.4 Gy fractions) can safely treat patients with localized prostate cancer with limited grade 2 or 3 late toxicity, according to a study published in the April 1, 2014 edition of the International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (Red Journal), the official scientific journal of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO). Previous randomized clinical trials have shown that dose-escalated radiation therapy improves prostate cancer control compared to lower-dose conventional radiation therapy <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/astro-physics\/dose-escalated-hypofractionated-imrt-conventional-imrt-for-prostate-cancer-have-like-side-effects.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-121626","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-astro-physics"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121626"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=121626"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/121626\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=121626"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=121626"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=121626"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}