A challenge to part of President Barack Obama's health care law that hits the Supreme Court on Tuesday could lead to one of the most significant religious freedom rulings in the high court's history. <\/p>\n
Four years ago, in their controversial Citizens United decision, the justices ruled that corporations had full free-speech rights in election campaigns. Now, they're being asked to decide whether for-profit companies are entitled to religious liberties. <\/p>\n
At issue in Tuesday's oral argument before the court is a regulation under the Affordable Care Act that requires employers to provide workers a health plan that covers the full range of contraceptives, including morning-after pills and intrauterine devices, or IUDs. <\/p>\n
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Tuesday in a religion-based challenge from family-owned companies that object to covering certain contraceptives in their health plans as part of a preventive care requirement. Among them, Hobby Lobby Stores Inc. is the largest. (AP Photo\/Ed Andrieski, File) <\/p>\n
The evangelical Christian family that controls Hobby Lobby Stores Inc., a chain of more than 500 arts and crafts outlets with 13,000 workers, says the requirement violates its religious beliefs. <\/p>\n
Some contraceptives can \"end human life after conception,\" the Green family says. Forcing the owners to pay for such devices would make them \"complicit in abortion,\" their lawyers say. <\/p>\n
A ruling in their favor could have an effect on tens of thousands of women whose employers share the Greens' objections to some or all contraceptives. <\/p>\n
But the case could also sweep far beyond just this one provision of Obamacare. The justices have been wary of accepting claims that religious beliefs can exempt people -- or companies -- from following laws that apply to everyone. The court's previous religious freedom cases usually involved narrowly focused claims from religious minorities, such as the Amish or Seventh-day Adventists. <\/p>\n
But the current court, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., has shown a greater interest in religious freedom claims. And because the objections to the contraceptive mandate come from Catholic bishops and evangelical Christians, not small or obscure sects, the potential effect has been magnified. <\/p>\n
The Obama administration argues that if the justices allow Hobby Lobby to refuse to pay for contraceptives because of its owners' religious beliefs, the way would open for religious objections to a broad array of laws. Companies potentially could shape the benefits they offer, and perhaps even their hiring, based on their religious convictions. <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Continued here:<\/p>\n
Supreme Court takes up Hobby Lobby health care case Tueday<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A challenge to part of President Barack Obama's health care law that hits the Supreme Court on Tuesday could lead to one of the most significant religious freedom rulings in the high court's history. Four years ago, in their controversial Citizens United decision, the justices ruled that corporations had full free-speech rights in election campaigns. Now, they're being asked to decide whether for-profit companies are entitled to religious liberties. Continue reading