Religion shouldnt dictate health care <\/p>\n
Kathleen Parker, like many religious people, seems to believe that religious liberty means the freedom of those who are religious to impose their beliefs on everyone else with whom they interact, especially those people over whom they have some control, such as employees and also customers [Obama, practice what you preach, Opinion, Feb. 9]. <\/p>\n
This interpretation of religious liberty fails to acknowledge that religion should be private and every person should have the right to her or his own religious beliefs and practices. I believe that any state or country that imposes, legalizes or allows the imposition of any religious belief of one person onto another is taking away the religious liberty of the other person. <\/p>\n
With that reasoning, when employers are allowed to not provide contraceptive health coverage because of their own religious beliefs, they are taking away their employees religious freedom. To borrow an observation by Jon Stewart, religious employers are already providing the means to obtain contraception it is called a paycheck. Why do so few people talk about this other side of religious liberty? <\/p>\n
Margaret Garber, Seattle <\/p>\n
Dont impose beliefs on others <\/p>\n
Kathleen Parker seems to intentionally ignore that President Obama does practice what he preaches in regard to religious freedom. She just doesnt want to acknowledge what he is actually preaching. <\/p>\n
By requiring that employers provide contraception as part of preventive insurance coverage, the president is relying on the First Amendment clause against the establishment of religion in his position that church-related groups or private employers cannot utilize the government as leverage to force their particular religious beliefs on their employees. <\/p>\n
Would Parker be as sanguine if an Orthodox Jewish employer refused to hire any males who werent circumcised into the Covenant of Abraham? Or if a Muslim charity required all employees not to drink or eat pork? Or if a fundamentalist Christian hired only those attesting to a belief in creationism? An employers freedom of religion does not include curtailing that same freedom for their employees. <\/p>\n
Philip L. Bereano, professor emeritus, University of Washington <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Read the original: <\/p>\n
Religion shouldnt dictate health care; dont impose beliefs on others<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Religion shouldnt dictate health care Kathleen Parker, like many religious people, seems to believe that religious liberty means the freedom of those who are religious to impose their beliefs on everyone else with whom they interact, especially those people over whom they have some control, such as employees and also customers [Obama, practice what you preach, Opinion, Feb. 9]. This interpretation of religious liberty fails to acknowledge that religion should be private and every person should have the right to her or his own religious beliefs and practices Continue reading