News | Mind & Brain <\/p>\n
Experts call for small and easy changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the \"bible\" of psychiatry, so that everyone with autism spectrum disorder qualifies for a diagnosis <\/p>\n
By Ferris Jabr | January 30, 2012 | <\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
DIAGNOSING THE DSM: The DSM-5 should sharpen the definition of autism, if the American Psychiatric Association makes a few tweaks in time Image: UrsaHoogle, iStockphoto <\/p>\n
People have been arguing about autism for a long time\u2014about what causes it, how to treat it and whether it qualifies as a mental disorder. The controversial idea that childhood vaccines trigger autism also persists, despite the fact that study after study has failed to find any evidence of such a link. Now, psychiatrists and members of the autistic community are embroiled in a more legitimate kerfuffle that centers on the definition of autism and how clinicians diagnose the disorder. The debate is not pointless semantics. In many cases, the type and number of symptoms clinicians look for when diagnosing autism determines how easy or difficult it is for autistic people to access medical, social and educational services. <\/p>\n
The controversy remains front and center because the American Psychiatric Association (APA) has almost finished redefining autism, along with all other mental disorders, in an overhaul of a hefty tome dubbed the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)\u2014the essential reference guide that clinicians use when evaluating their patients. The newest edition of the manual, the DSM-5, is slated for publication in May 2013. Psychiatrists and parents have voiced concerns that the new definition of autism in the DSM-5 will exclude many people from both a diagnosis and state services that depend on a diagnosis. <\/p>\n
The devilish confusion is in the details. When the APA publishes the DSM-5, people who have already met the criteria for autism in the current DSM-IV will not suddenly lose their current diagnosis as some parents have feared, nor will they lose state services. But several studies recently published in child psychiatry journals suggest that it will be more difficult for new generations of high-functioning autistic people to receive a diagnosis because the DSM-5 criteria are too strict. Together, the studies conclude that the major changes to the definition of autism in the DSM-5 are well grounded in research and that the new criteria are more accurate than the current DSM-IV criteria. But in its efforts to make diagnosis more accurate, the APA may have raised the bar for autism a little too high, neglecting autistic people whose symptoms are not as severe as others. The studies also point out, however, that minor tweaks to the DSM-5 criteria would make a big difference, bringing autistic people with milder symptoms or sets of symptoms that differ from classic autism back into the spectrum <\/p>\n
A new chapter
Autism is a disorder in which a child's brain does not develop typically, and neurons form connections in unusual ways. The major features of autism are impaired social interaction and communication\u2014such as delayed language development, avoiding eye-contact and difficulty making friends\u2014as well as restricted and repetitive behavior, such as repeatedly making the same sound or intense fascination with a particular toy. <\/p>\n
The DSM-5 subsumes autistic disorder, Asperger's disorder, childhood disintegrative disorder, and pervasive developmental disorder not otherwise specified (PDD-NOS)\u2014which are all distinct disorders in DSM-IV\u2014into one category called autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The idea is that these conditions have such similar symptoms that they do not belong in separate categories, but instead fall on the same continuum. <\/p>\n
Essentially, to qualify for a diagnosis of autistic disorder in DSM-IV, a patient must show at least six of 12 symptoms, which are divided into three groups: deficits in social interaction; deficits in communication; and repetitive and restricted behaviors and interests. In contrast, the DSM-5 divides seven symptoms of ASD into two main groups: deficits in social communication and social interaction; and restricted, repetitive behaviors and interests. (For a closer look at the changes, read the companion piece: \"Autism Is Not a Math Problem\". You can also compare DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for autism on the APA's Web site.) <\/p>\n
The APA collapsed the social interaction and communication groups from DSM-IV into one group in the new edition because research in the last decade has shown that the symptoms in these groups almost always appear together. Research and clinical experience has also established that heightened or dulled sensitivity to sensory experiences is a core feature of autism, which is why it appears in DSM-5 but not in the preceding version. The psychiatric community has generally applauded these changes to the criteria for ASD. <\/p>\n
What is in question is how many of the DSM-5 criteria a patient must meet to receive a diagnosis\u2014too many and the manual excludes autistic people with fewer or milder symptoms; too few and it assigns autism to people who don't have it. Since the 1980s the prevalence of autism has dramatically increased worldwide, especially in the U.S. where the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that nine per 1,000 children have been diagnosed with ASD. Many psychiatrists agree that the increase is at least partially explained by loose criteria in DSM-IV. <\/p>\n
\"If the DSM-IV criteria are taken too literally, anybody in the world could qualify for Asperger's or PDD-NOS,\" says Catherine Lord, one of the members of the APA's DSM-5 Development Neurodevelopmental Disorders Work Group. \"The specificity is terrible. We need to make sure the criteria are not pulling in kids who do not have these disorders.\" <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Go here to read the rest: News | Mind & Brain Experts call for small and easy changes to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, the \"bible\" of psychiatry, so that everyone with autism spectrum disorder qualifies for a diagnosis By Ferris Jabr | January 30, 2012 | DIAGNOSING THE DSM: The DSM-5 should sharpen the definition of autism, if the American Psychiatric Association makes a few tweaks in time Image: UrsaHoogle, iStockphoto People have been arguing about autism for a long time\u2014about what causes it, how to treat it and whether it qualifies as a mental disorder. The controversial idea that childhood vaccines trigger autism also persists, despite the fact that study after study has failed to find any evidence of such a link. Now, psychiatrists and members of the autistic community are embroiled in a more legitimate kerfuffle that centers on the definition of autism and how clinicians diagnose the disorder Continue reading
\nRedefining Autism: Will New DSM-5 Criteria for ASD Exclude Some People?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"