{"id":1063464,"date":"2013-04-14T02:58:55","date_gmt":"2013-04-14T06:58:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.longevitymedicine.tv\/stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial-19-million-award-from-california-stem-cell-agency\/"},"modified":"2024-08-17T20:29:43","modified_gmt":"2024-08-18T00:29:43","slug":"stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial-19-million-award-from-california-stem-cell-agency-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial-19-million-award-from-california-stem-cell-agency-2.php","title":{"rendered":"StemCells, Inc., Nails Down Controversial, $19 Million Award from California Stem Cell Agency"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The stock price of <b>StemCells, Inc<\/b>.,<br>price today jumped as much as 9 percent after the company disclosed<br>it had finally concluded an agreement with the California stem cell<br>agency for a $19.3 million forgivable loan for research twice rejected by the agency's scientific reviewers..<\/p><div><\/div><div>The stem cell agency governing board seven months ago approved the loan to the Newark, Ca., firm. But the<br>cash was withheld until the financially strapped company could<br>demonstrate that it could match the size of the loan, as promised in<br>its application.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The StemCells, Inc., (SCI) application<br>was nixed two times in 2012 by the agency's scientific reviewers who gave it a<br>score of 61. In a controversial move, the 29-member board <a href=\"http:\/\/californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com\/2012\/09\/stemcells-inc-wins-another-20-million.html\">approved the award <\/a>in early September on a 7-5 vote after former agency<br>chairman <b>Robert Klein<\/b> intervened publicly on behalf of the firm. <a href=\"http:\/\/californiastemcellreport.blogspot.mx\/2012\/08\/an-unseemly-performance-former-chair-of.html\">It was the first time that Klein had lobbied the board publicly on behalf of an application<\/a>. It was also the first time that the board<br>approved an application that was rejected twice by its reviewers, a<br>panel of internationally recognized stem cell scientists.<\/div><div><\/div><div>In <a href=\"http:\/\/investor.stemcellsinc.com\/phoenix.zhtml?c=86230&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1805843&amp;highlight=\">a press release<\/a>,  <b>Martin McGlynn<\/b>,<br>CEO of StemCells, Inc., said,<\/div><blockquote><p>\"With CIRM's support, we are now<br>able to lay the groundwork that could result in the world's first<br>neural stem cell trial in Alzheimer's patients.\"<\/p><\/blockquote><div>Both the company and the $3 billion<br>state research agency were tight-lipped about the nature of the<br>matching funds from the company, which reported losses of $28.5<br>million in 2012 on revenues of $1.4 million.<\/div><div><\/div><div>In a brief response to questions from the<br><b>California Stem Cell Report,<\/b> McGlynn said,&nbsp;<\/div><blockquote><p>&nbsp;&ldquo;At this time, we<br>do not intend to elaborate any further on the contents of our press<br>releases or public filings pertaining to the SVB (<b>Silicon Valley Bank<\/b>) or <b>CIRM<\/b>(the stem cell agency) loans.&rdquo;<\/p><\/blockquote><div>Earlier this week, the company <a href=\"http:\/\/investor.stemcellsinc.com\/phoenix.zhtml?c=86230&amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;ID=1804649&amp;highlight=\">reported receiving a $10 million loan<\/a> from Silicon Valley Bank. Both McGlynn<br>and the stem cell agency did not answer a question about whether<br>those funds are being used to back the award from California<br>taxpayers.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The agency confirmed that the firm was<br>providing $19.3 million in matching resources. But <b>Kevin McCormack<\/b>,<br>senior director of public communications, did not provide any<br>specifics on the nature of the match. He only said,<\/div><blockquote><p>&ldquo;The matching&nbsp;&nbsp;requires<br>them to demonstrate they have enough&nbsp;funds&nbsp;necessary to<br>fund&nbsp;SCI&rsquo;s&nbsp;share&nbsp;going forward as well as their own<br>operations and other commitments.&rdquo;<\/p><\/blockquote><div>The award was originally for $20<br>million. We have queried the agency about the smaller figure<br>announced today.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The company's stock price<a href=\"http:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/quote\/STEM:US\"> rose as high as $1.87 earlier today<\/a> after closing at $1.71 yesterday. It stood at<br>$1.77 at the time of this writing. Its 52 week high is $2.67, and its<br>52 week low is $0.59. The loan from Silicon Valley Bank gives the<br>bank warrants to purchase 293,531 shares of the company at $1.70 over<br>the next 10 years.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The 10-year loan from CIRM is low risk for the<br>company, which said its &ldquo;obligation to repay the loan will be<br>contingent upon the success&rdquo; of the research. If a product is<br>developed, it will take years before it could hit the market.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The award to StemCells, Inc., put<br>the stem cell agency in a touchy situation involving the company's decision last month to <a href=\"http:\/\/californiastemcellreport.blogspot.mx\/2013\/04\/stemcells-inc-rejects-20-million-from.html\">reject an additional $20 million award<\/a> from<br>the agency.( It was the first time a recipient has rejected an award.) Neither the company nor the agency would give a reason for<br>the rejection of the loan for a spinal injury project . However, the<br>award also required a $20 million match, which undoubtedly tested the company's resources.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The spinal injury application was<br>scored at 79 by agency reviewers and was routinely approved by the<br>board. With its withdrawal by the company, the agency, which prides<br>itself on funding only the best science, was left supporting research<br>(StemCells, Inc.'s Alzheimer's project) judged significantly inferior<br>by reviewers with its score of 61.<\/div><div><\/div><div>In response to a question about that<br>situation, CIRM's McCormack said,<\/div><blockquote><p>&ldquo;Our goal is to always fund the best,<br>most promising science. This is not the first time that our board has<br>voted to fund a project that the Grants Review Group had not<br>recommended (this has happened in around 2% of cases) The board did<br>so for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that this was<br>the first disease team application that had a goal of &nbsp;moving a<br>promising stem cell therapy for Alzheimer's&nbsp;towards&nbsp;clinical<br>trials.&rdquo;<\/p><\/blockquote><div><a href=\"http:\/\/cirm.ca.gov\/application-reviews\/9639\">The round in question, however, had another application dealing with Alzheimer's<\/a> which was scored at 63,<br>two points higher than the one from StemCells, Inc. Reviewers also did not recommend funding that application.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The action last September by the<br>agency board came only after it publicly said the funds would not be<br>distributed until the StemCells, Inc., could show it could provide<br>the match, still another first for the agency.<\/div><div><\/div><div>The award triggered a column in<br>the<b> Los Angeles Times<\/b> by Pulitzer Prize winning writer <b>Michael<br>Hiltzik<\/b>, who said in October that &nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com\/2012\/10\/los-angeles-times-stemcells-inc-award.html\">the<br>process was &ldquo;redolent of cronyism.&rdquo;<\/a>&nbsp;He said a &ldquo;charmed<br>relationship&rdquo; existed among StemCells, Inc., its &ldquo;powerful<br>friends&rdquo; and the stem cell agency.<\/div><div><\/div><div>StemCells, Inc., was founded by<br>Stanford researcher <b>Irv Weissman<\/b>, who was a  major fundraiser for<br><b>Proposition 71<\/b>, which created the stem cell agency in 2004. Klein<br>headed the ballot campaign, which spent more than $30 million to win<br>voter approval. Weissman sits on board of directors of StemCells,<br>Inc., and <a href=\"http:\/\/investor.stemcellsinc.com\/phoenix.zhtml?c=86230&amp;p=irol-secText&amp;TEXT=aHR0cDovL2FwaS50ZW5rd2l6YXJkLmNvbS9maWxpbmcueG1sP2lwYWdlPTg4NTAwOTEmRFNFUT0xJlNFUT0mU1FERVNDPVNFQ1RJT05fSU5TSURFUiZleHA9JnN1YnNpZD01Nw%3D%3D\">holds 124,608 shares in the firm, including 8,630 he reported this month receiving.<\/a><\/div><div><\/div><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.longevitymedicine.tv\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/550e3_34J6wy7wpLY\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\">Source:<br><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/blogspot\/uqpFc\/~3\/34J6wy7wpLY\/stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial.html\">http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/blogspot\/uqpFc\/~3\/34J6wy7wpLY\/stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial.html<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The stock price of StemCells, Inc.,price today jumped as much as 9 percent after the company disclosedit had finally concluded an agreement with the California stem cellagency for a $19.3 million forgivable loan for research twice rejected by the agency's &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/stemcells-inc-nails-down-controversial-19-million-award-from-california-stem-cell-agency-2.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[25,1246878],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1063464","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stem-cell-therapy","category-stem-cells"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063464"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1063464"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063464\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1063464"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1063464"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1063464"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}