{"id":1063453,"date":"2013-03-03T02:56:26","date_gmt":"2013-03-03T07:56:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.longevitymedicine.tv\/california-stem-cell-agency-comparing-the-critiques\/"},"modified":"2024-08-17T20:29:38","modified_gmt":"2024-08-18T00:29:38","slug":"california-stem-cell-agency-comparing-the-critiques-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/california-stem-cell-agency-comparing-the-critiques-2.php","title":{"rendered":"California Stem Cell Agency: Comparing the Critiques"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>State Controller <b>John Chiang<\/b> has posted<br>a useful, side-by-side comparison of critiques of the $3 billion<br>California stem cell agency, including the<b> Institute of Medicine(IOM)<\/b><br>study, along with the responses from the agency.<\/p><div><\/div><div>Chiang, the state's top fiscal officer,<br>has additionally posted the initial remarks Jan. 23 by <b>CIRM<\/b> Chairman<br><b>Jonathan Thomas<\/b> before the stem cell agency governing board on his<br>plan to deal with the sweeping recommendations of the IOM.<\/div><div><\/div><div>Regardless of one's opinion of the<br>board's response to the IOM, Thomas adroitly handled the discussion<br>and vote, not a small accomplishment given the size of the board (29<br>members) and the legal restrictions involving public meetings. Under<br>state law, Thomas could not lobby significant numbers of the board in<br>advance of the meeting. He was restricted to engineering the approval<br>in a public session, which can easily take on a life of its own given<br>the unwieldy size of the board and the necessity for public comment.<\/div><div><\/div><div>As for the documents posted by Chiang,<br>he is chairman of the<b> Citizens Financial Accountability and Oversight<br>Committee<\/b>, the only state body specifically charged with oversight of<br>the agency and its board.  The web site for the committee is the only<br>location on the Internet where Thomas' prepared remarks and the<br>comparison can be found.<\/div><div><\/div><div>Chiang's comparison chart includes not<br>only the IOM study, but last year's performance audit and the <b>Little<br>Hoover Commission<\/b> study in 2009. Missing, however, is the state<br>auditor's report in 2007 and its <a href=\"http:\/\/californiastemcellreport.blogspot.com\/2013\/02\/time-for-public-disclosure-of-financial.html\">recommendation that the agency seek an attorney general's opinion on whether scientific grant reviewers must file a public financial disclosure form.<\/a><\/div><div><\/div><div>Here are links to the various<br>documents: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sco.ca.gov\/Files-EO\/CFAOC\/Item_7_-_Opening_Comments_by_Jonathan_Thomas.pdf\">Thomas' prepared comments<\/a>,<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sco.ca.gov\/Files-EO\/CFAOC\/Item_7_-_IOM_Report_-_Proposed_CIRM_Response.pdf\"> Power Point chart used by Thomas<\/a>,<br><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sco.ca.gov\/Files-EO\/CFAOC\/Item_7a_-_Comparison_Chart.pdf\">comparison chart of various studies<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/cirm.ca.gov\/sites\/default\/files\/files\/agenda\/transcripts\/ICOC%20Workshop-1-23-13_Transcript_0.pdf\">the transcript of the Jan. 23 meeting <\/a>during which the governing board approved its response.<\/div><p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/www.longevitymedicine.tv\/wp-content\/plugins\/wp-o-matic\/cache\/442a1_Yb7Eb9xPMvo\" height=\"1\" width=\"1\" style=\"padding-left:10px; padding-right: 10px;\">Source:<br><a href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/blogspot\/uqpFc\/~3\/Yb7Eb9xPMvo\/california-stem-cell-agency-comparing.html\">http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/~r\/blogspot\/uqpFc\/~3\/Yb7Eb9xPMvo\/california-stem-cell-agency-comparing.html<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>State Controller John Chiang has posteda useful, side-by-side comparison of critiques of the $3 billionCalifornia stem cell agency, including the Institute of Medicine(IOM)study, along with the responses from the agency.Chiang, the state's top fiscal officer,has additionally posted the initial remarks &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/stem-cell-therapy\/california-stem-cell-agency-comparing-the-critiques-2.php\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"limit_modified_date":"","last_modified_date":"","_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[25,1246878],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1063453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-stem-cell-therapy","category-stem-cells"],"modified_by":null,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063453"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1063453"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1063453\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1063453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1063453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.euvolution.com\/futurist-transhuman-news-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1063453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}